Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Norway.
Autism. 2021 Nov;25(8):2162-2176. doi: 10.1177/13623613211034382. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
Requests for diagnoses of pathological demand avoidance have increased over recent years, but pathological demand avoidance remains a controversial issue. The concept of pathological demand avoidance has been criticised for undermining the self-advocacy of autistic people and neglecting the potential role of anxiety as a possible underlying or contributing cause. The current study was undertaken to summarise and review the methodological quality and findings from current research into pathological demand avoidance in children and adolescents. Further aims were to describe how pathological demand avoidance has been identified and to explore the relationships with autism and other developmental and psychiatric disorders. After a comprehensive search, 13 relevant studies using a wide range of methods were identified and systematic quality assessments were undertaken. All the studies had based the identification of pathological demand avoidance, directly or indirectly, on descriptions from the original study by Newson and colleagues. However, the methods used to develop these criteria were not clearly described. Most studies relied exclusively on parental report for data, and there was a general failure to take account of alternative explanations for the behaviours under study. No studies explored the views of individuals with pathological demand avoidance themselves. Problems concerning definition and measurement in the reviewed studies currently limit any conclusions regarding the uniformity or stability of the behaviours described, or the characteristics of individuals displaying them. Relationships between pathological demand avoidance and other emotional and behavioural difficulties should be explored in future research, as should the perspectives of individuals with pathological demand avoidance themselves.
近年来,对病理性需求回避的诊断请求有所增加,但病理性需求回避仍然是一个有争议的问题。病理性需求回避的概念因其破坏了自闭症患者的自我倡导能力以及忽视了焦虑作为潜在的潜在或促成原因的潜在作用而受到批评。本研究旨在总结和回顾目前对儿童和青少年病理性需求回避的研究的方法学质量和发现。进一步的目的是描述如何识别病理性需求回避,并探讨其与自闭症和其他发育和精神障碍的关系。经过全面搜索,确定了 13 项使用广泛方法的相关研究,并进行了系统的质量评估。所有的研究都直接或间接地根据 Newson 等人的原始研究中的描述来确定病理性需求回避的存在。然而,用于制定这些标准的方法并未明确描述。大多数研究仅依赖于父母的报告来获取数据,而且普遍没有考虑到对研究行为的替代解释。没有研究探讨有病理性需求回避的个体自己的观点。在审查的研究中,目前关于所描述行为的一致性或稳定性,或表现出这些行为的个体的特征的任何结论都受到定义和测量方面的问题的限制。未来的研究应探讨病理性需求回避与其他情绪和行为困难之间的关系,以及病理性需求回避者自己的观点。