Suppr超能文献

在一项基于二级医疗的可行性随机对照试验的方案发展阶段,对护士主导的非药物性膝关节疼痛综合护理方案进行保真度评估:一项混合方法研究。

Fidelity assessment of nurse-led non-pharmacological package of care for knee pain in the package development phase of a feasibility randomised controlled trial based in secondary care: a mixed methods study.

机构信息

Academic Rheumatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 29;11(7):e045242. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045242.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate fidelity of delivery of a nurse-led non-pharmacological complex intervention for knee pain.

SETTING

Secondary care. Single-centre study.

STUDY DESIGN

Mixed methods study.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighteen adults with chronic knee pain.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Age >40 years, knee pain present for longer than 3 months, knee pain for most days of the previous month, at least moderate pain in two of the five domains of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index pain scale.

INTERVENTIONS

Nurse-led non-pharmacological intervention comprising assessment, education, exercise, use of hot/cold treatments, footwear modification, walking aids and weight-loss advice (if required).

OUTCOMES

Primary: fidelity of delivery of intervention, secondary: nurses' experience of delivering intervention.

METHODS

Each intervention session with every participant was video recorded and formed part of fidelity assessment. Fidelity checklists were completed by the research nurse after each session and by an independent researcher, after viewing the video-recordings blinded to nurse ratings. Fidelity scores (%), percentage agreement and 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated. Two semi-structured interviews were conducted with the research nurse.

RESULTS

Fourteen participants completed all visits. 62 treatment sessions took place. Nurse self-report and assessor video rating scores for all 62 treatment sessions were included in fidelity assessment. Overall fidelity was higher on nurse self-report (97.7%) than on objective video-rating (84.2%). Percentage agreement between nurse self-report and video-rating was 73.3% (95% CI 71.3 to 75.3). Fidelity was lowest for advice on footwear and walking aids. The nurse reported difficulty advising on thermal treatments, footwear and walking aids, and did not feel confident negotiating achievable and realistic goals with participants.

CONCLUSIONS

A trained research nurse can deliver most components of a non-pharmacological intervention for knee pain to a high degree of fidelity. Future research should assess intervention fidelity in a routine clinical setting, and examine its clinical and cost-effectiveness.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03670706.

摘要

目的

评估护士主导的非药物性综合干预治疗膝关节疼痛的实施情况。

设置

二级医疗机构。单中心研究。

研究设计

混合方法研究。

参与者

18 名患有慢性膝关节疼痛的成年人。

纳入标准

年龄>40 岁,膝关节疼痛持续超过 3 个月,膝关节疼痛在过去一个月的大多数日子里,在 Western Ontario 和 McMaster 大学骨关节炎指数疼痛量表的五个领域中的至少两个领域有至少中度疼痛。

干预措施

护士主导的非药物性综合干预措施包括评估、教育、运动、冷热治疗、鞋类修改、助行器和减肥建议(如果需要)。

结果

主要结果:干预措施的实施情况;次要结果:护士实施干预措施的经验。

方法

对每位参与者的每次干预会议进行视频记录,并作为实施情况评估的一部分。每次会议后,研究护士和独立研究员(在观看视频记录时对护士评分不知情)都会完成实施情况检查表。计算了(%)、百分比一致性和 95%置信区间(CI)。对研究护士进行了两次半结构式访谈。

结果

14 名参与者完成了所有就诊。共进行了 62 次治疗。纳入实施情况评估的是 62 次治疗中所有治疗的护士自我报告和评估员视频评分。总体而言,护士自我报告的实施情况(97.7%)高于客观视频评分(84.2%)。护士自我报告和视频评分之间的百分比一致性为 73.3%(95%CI 71.3 至 75.3)。在关于鞋类和助行器的建议方面,实施情况最低。护士报告在热疗、鞋类和助行器方面提供建议存在困难,并且在与参与者协商可实现和现实的目标方面缺乏信心。

结论

经过培训的研究护士可以高度忠实于提供非药物性膝关节疼痛干预措施的大多数组成部分。未来的研究应在常规临床环境中评估干预措施的实施情况,并研究其临床和成本效益。

试验注册号

NCT03670706。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed93/8323379/ae71c21fd7cd/bmjopen-2020-045242f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验