Suppr超能文献

改善和评估姑息治疗复杂干预随机对照试验中实施保真度报告水平的策略:系统评价。

Strategies used in improving and assessing the level of reporting of implementation fidelity in randomised controlled trials of palliative care complex interventions: A systematic review.

机构信息

1 Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute, Singapore.

2 Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Palliat Med. 2018 Feb;32(2):500-516. doi: 10.1177/0269216317717369. Epub 2017 Jul 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implementation fidelity is critical in evaluating effectiveness of interventions.

AIM

Identifying and summarising strategies to improve and assess the level of reporting of implementation fidelity in randomised controlled trials of palliative care complex interventions.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Published and completed randomised controlled trials from 2000 to current evaluating effectiveness of specialised palliative care services on patient-centred outcomes in adult patients were examined. MEDLINE was searched from 2008 to 29 September 2015 and supplemented by randomised controlled trials identified in a 2008 systematic review.

RESULTS

Altogether, 20 randomised controlled trials involving 8426 patients were reviewed using 40 subcomponents of five elements of implementation fidelity (resulting in 20 × 40 = 800 items). Over 88 strategies were identified, classified under the following elements: 'treatment design', 'training providers', 'delivery of treatment', 'receipt of treatment' and 'enactment of treatment skills'. No single overarching strategy was discovered. Strategies under 'treatment design' aimed to ensure equivalent treatment dose between and within intervention and control groups, and delivery of necessary ingredients. Ongoing 'training (of) providers' included supervision and ensuring skill acquisition. Use of treatment manuals and implementation checklists aimed to aid 'delivery of treatment'. Research teams aimed to improve 'receipt of treatment' by transmitting clear information and verifying understanding, while improving 'enactment of treatment skills' by reviewing and reinforcing prior content. Only 26% of the items received sufficient reporting; 34% were either not used or reported on.

CONCLUSION

Implementation fidelity in palliative care is under-recognised. A table to collate these strategies to improve implementation fidelity in palliative care research and clinical practice is proposed.

摘要

背景

在评估干预措施的有效性时,实施保真度至关重要。

目的

确定和总结改善和评估姑息治疗复杂干预措施随机对照试验中实施保真度报告水平的策略。

设计

系统评价。

数据来源

检查了 2000 年至目前评估专门姑息治疗服务对成年患者以患者为中心的结局的有效性的已发表和已完成的随机对照试验。从 2008 年至 2015 年 9 月 29 日对 MEDLINE 进行了搜索,并补充了 2008 年系统评价中确定的随机对照试验。

结果

共审查了 20 项涉及 8426 名患者的随机对照试验,使用实施保真度的五个要素的 40 个子组件(共 20×40=800 个项目)。共确定了 88 多种策略,分为以下要素:“治疗设计”、“培训提供者”、“治疗提供”、“治疗接受”和“治疗技能实施”。没有发现单一的总体策略。“治疗设计”下的策略旨在确保干预组和对照组之间以及组内的治疗剂量相等,并提供必要的成分。持续的“(对)提供者的培训”包括监督和确保技能的获取。使用治疗手册和实施清单旨在帮助“提供治疗”。研究团队旨在通过传递清晰的信息和验证理解来提高“治疗接受”,通过审查和加强先前的内容来提高“治疗技能的实施”。只有 26%的项目得到了充分的报告;34%的项目既没有使用也没有报告。

结论

姑息治疗中的实施保真度未得到充分认识。提出了一个表格,以整理这些策略,以提高姑息治疗研究和临床实践中的实施保真度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验