Centre for Intelligent Healthcare, Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland.
Br J Health Psychol. 2020 Feb;25(1):17-38. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12392. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
Existing fidelity studies of physical activity interventions are limited in methodological quality and rigour, particularly those delivered by health care providers in clinical settings. The present study aimed to enhance and assess the fidelity of a walking intervention delivered by health care providers within general practice in line with the NIH Behavior Change Consortium treatment fidelity framework.
Two practice nurses and six health care assistants delivered a theory-based walking intervention to 63 patients in their own practices. A cross-sectional mixed-methods study assessed fidelity related to treatment delivery and treatment receipt, from the perspectives of health care providers and patients.
All providers received training and demonstrated delivery competence prior to the trial. Delivery of intervention content was coded from audio-recordings using a standardized checklist. Qualitative interviews with 12 patients were conducted to assess patient perspectives of treatment receipt and analysed using framework analysis.
Overall, 78% of intervention components were delivered as per the protocol (range 36-91%), with greater fidelity for components requiring active engagement from patients (e.g., completion of worksheets). The qualitative data highlighted differences in patients' comprehension of specific intervention components. Understanding of, and engagement with, motivational components aimed at improving self-efficacy was poorer than for volitional planning components.
High levels of fidelity of delivery were demonstrated. However, patient-, provider-, and component-level factors impacted on treatment delivery and receipt. We recommend that methods for the enhancement and assessment of treatment fidelity are consistently implemented to enhance the rigour of physical activity intervention research. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? Physical activity interventions delivered within primary care by health professionals have so far demonstrated limited impact on behaviour change initiation and maintenance. Treatment fidelity enhancement and assessment strategies can support the successful translation of behaviour change interventions into real-life settings. Few studies have examined treatment fidelity within the context of physical activity interventions, particularly within clinical settings, and existing fidelity studies are limited by methodological quality and rigour. What does this study add? High levels of fidelity were found for a physical activity intervention delivered in primary care. Patient-, provider-, and component-level factors may impact on treatment delivery and receipt. The implementation of best practice fidelity recommendations can support near-optimal fidelity.
现有的体力活动干预措施的保真度研究在方法质量和严格性方面存在局限性,特别是在临床环境中由医疗保健提供者提供的干预措施。本研究旨在根据 NIH 行为改变联盟治疗保真度框架,增强并评估由全科医生提供的步行干预措施的保真度。
两名执业护士和六名医疗保健助理在自己的诊所为 63 名患者提供基于理论的步行干预措施。一项横断面混合方法研究从医疗保健提供者和患者的角度评估了与治疗提供和治疗接受相关的保真度。
所有提供者在试验前都接受了培训并展示了提供治疗的能力。使用标准化清单从音频记录中对干预内容的提供进行编码。对 12 名患者进行了定性访谈,以评估患者对治疗接受的看法,并使用框架分析进行分析。
总体而言,按照方案提供了 78%的干预内容(范围为 36%-91%),对于需要患者积极参与的内容(例如,完成工作表),保真度更高。定性数据突出了患者对特定干预内容的理解差异。与旨在提高自我效能的激励性成分相比,对动机成分的理解和参与程度较差。
提供的内容显示出高度的保真度。然而,患者、提供者和组件层面的因素影响了治疗的提供和接受。我们建议始终如一地实施治疗保真度的增强和评估方法,以提高体力活动干预研究的严谨性。
在这个主题上已经知道什么?由医疗专业人员在初级保健中提供的体力活动干预措施迄今为止对行为改变的启动和维持影响有限。治疗保真度增强和评估策略可以支持行为改变干预措施在现实环境中的成功转化。很少有研究在体力活动干预的背景下检查治疗保真度,特别是在临床环境中,现有的保真度研究受到方法质量和严谨性的限制。
这项研究增加了什么?在初级保健中提供的体力活动干预措施发现了高度的保真度。患者、提供者和组件层面的因素可能会影响治疗的提供和接受。实施最佳实践保真度建议可以支持近乎最佳的保真度。