• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluation of students' perceived clinical competence and learning needs following an online virtual simulation education programme with debriefing during the COVID-19 pandemic.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,通过在线虚拟模拟教育计划和汇报进行评估后,学生对临床能力和学习需求的认知。
Nurs Open. 2021 Nov;8(6):3045-3054. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1017. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
2
[Impact of Nurse Practitioners and Nursing Education on COVID-19 Pandemics: Innovative Strategies of Authentic Technology-Integrated Clinical Simulation].[执业护士及护理教育对COVID-19大流行的影响:真实技术整合临床模拟的创新策略]
Hu Li Za Zhi. 2021 Oct;68(5):4-6. doi: 10.6224/JN.202110_68(5).01.
3
Exploring student perceptions of virtual simulation versus traditional clinical and manikin-based simulation.探索学生对虚拟模拟与传统临床模拟和基于人体模型的模拟的看法。
J Prof Nurs. 2021 Jul-Aug;37(4):683-689. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.05.005. Epub 2021 May 8.
4
Responding to a simulated disaster in the virtual or live classroom: Is there a difference in BSN student learning?在虚拟或实景课堂中应对模拟灾害:BSN 学生的学习有何不同?
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 Aug;55:103170. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103170. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
5
Virtual simulation and problem-based learning enhance perceived clinical and cultural competence of nursing students in Asia: A randomized controlled cross-over study.虚拟模拟和基于问题的学习提高了亚洲护理专业学生的临床认知能力和文化胜任力:一项随机对照交叉研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Apr;123:105721. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105721. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
6
Evidentiary and theoretical foundations for virtual simulation in nursing education.护理教育中虚拟仿真的证据和理论基础。
J Prof Nurs. 2021 Sep-Oct;37(5):810-815. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jun 7.
7
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
8
The effectiveness of the virtual patient-based social learning approach in undergraduate nursing education: A quasi-experimental study.基于虚拟患者的社交学习方法在本科护理教育中的效果:一项准实验研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jan;108:105164. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105164. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
9
Effects of S-PBL in Maternity Nursing Clinical Practicum on Learning Attitude, Metacognition, and Critical Thinking in Nursing Students: A Quasi-Experimental Design.S-PBL 在助产护理临床实习中对护生学习态度、元认知和批判性思维的影响:一项准实验设计。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 27;17(21):7866. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217866.
10
Understanding poverty through virtual simulation: implications for student clinical practice.通过虚拟模拟理解贫困:对学生临床实践的启示。
Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2023 Dec 18;20(1). doi: 10.1515/ijnes-2022-0105. eCollection 2023 Jan 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Low Resource, High Impact: Just-In-Time Training Toolkit in Response to a Public Health Crisis.资源匮乏,影响重大:应对公共卫生危机的即时培训工具包。
Clin Simul Nurs. 2024 Dec;97. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2024.101629. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
2
Simulation-Based Learning Supported by Technology to Enhance Critical Thinking in Nursing Students: Scoping Review.技术支持的基于模拟的学习以增强护生批判性思维:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 18;27:e58744. doi: 10.2196/58744.
3
Subjective learning gain from a simulation-based health management course: a mixed methods study.基于模拟的健康管理课程的主观学习收益:一项混合方法研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 1;12:1400135. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1400135. eCollection 2024.
4
The hotspots and trends of nursing master's education in China: a bibliometric analysis from 2000 to 2022.中国护理学硕士教育的热点与趋势:基于2000年至2022年的文献计量分析
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):1082. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06005-w.
5
The design, implementation, and evaluation of a blended (in-person and virtual) Clinical Competency Examination for final-year nursing students.最终年制护理学生的混合(面对面和虚拟)临床能力考试的设计、实施和评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 28;24(1):936. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05935-9.
6
How Are Alternative Clinical Placements Performed Compared to Traditional Clinical Placements During the COVID-19 Pandemic? Sought Through a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在新冠疫情期间,与传统临床实习相比,替代性临床实习是如何开展的?通过系统评价和荟萃分析进行探索。
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Apr 11;34(4):927-947. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02037-5. eCollection 2024 Aug.
7
Analysis of Knowledge and Satisfaction in Virtual Clinical Simulation among Nursing Students: A Mixed Study.护理专业学生对虚拟临床模拟的知识与满意度分析:一项混合研究。
Nurs Rep. 2024 Apr 27;14(2):1067-1078. doi: 10.3390/nursrep14020081.
8
Relationship between learning styles and clinical competency in nursing students.护生学习风格与临床能力之间的关系。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05432-z.
9
Nursing students' evaluation of clinical learning environment and supervision models before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative study.护理专业学生对 COVID-19 大流行前后临床学习环境和监督模式的评价:一项比较研究。
Acta Biomed. 2023 Dec 5;94(6):e2023256. doi: 10.23750/abm.v94i6.14750.
10
The status of virtual simulation experiments in medical education in China: based on the national virtual simulation experiment teaching Center (iLAB-X).中国医学教育中的虚拟仿真实验现状:基于国家虚拟仿真实验教学中心(iLAB-X)。
Med Educ Online. 2023 Dec;28(1):2272387. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2023.2272387. Epub 2023 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of a virtual learning environment compared with an individual handheld device on pharmacology knowledge acquisition, satisfaction and comfort ratings.与个人手持设备相比,虚拟学习环境对药理学知识获取、满意度和舒适度评分的影响。
Nurse Educ Today. 2020 Sep;92:104518. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104518. Epub 2020 Jun 29.
2
Debriefing: A Place for Enthusiastic Teaching and Learning at a Distance.汇报:一个进行远程热情教学与学习的场所。
Clin Simul Nurs. 2020 Dec;49:16-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 May 13.
3
Traditional clinical training combined with high-fidelity simulation-based activities improves clinical competency and knowledge among nursing students on a maternity nursing course.传统临床培训与基于高保真模拟的活动相结合,可提高护理专业学生在产科护理课程中的临床能力和知识水平。
Nurs Forum. 2019 Jul;54(3):434-440. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12351. Epub 2019 May 15.
4
Clinical Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education: Randomized Controlled Trial.护理教育中的临床虚拟模拟:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 18;21(3):e11529. doi: 10.2196/11529.
5
Chinese version of the clinical learning environment comparison survey: Assessment of reliability and validity.临床学习环境比较调查中文版:信效度评估
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Dec;71:121-128. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.09.026. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
6
Evaluating competence and confidence using simulation technology.使用模拟技术评估能力和信心。
Nursing. 2018 Oct;48(10):45-52. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000545022.36908.f3.
7
Virtual Gaming Simulation in Nursing Education: A Focus Group Study.护理教育中的虚拟游戏模拟:一项焦点小组研究。
J Nurs Educ. 2017 May 1;56(5):274-280. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20170421-04.
8
Simulation debriefing for clinical judgment development: A concept analysis.用于临床判断发展的模拟总结汇报:一项概念分析
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Oct;45:42-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 18.
9
Using Simulation for Clinical Practice Hours in Nurse Practitioner Education in The United States: A Systematic Review.美国执业护士教育中使用模拟教学法以获取临床实践时长:一项系统综述
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 Feb;37:128-35. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.11.006. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
10
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance.复杂干预措施的过程评估:医学研究委员会指南。
BMJ. 2015 Mar 19;350:h1258. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h1258.

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,通过在线虚拟模拟教育计划和汇报进行评估后,学生对临床能力和学习需求的认知。

Evaluation of students' perceived clinical competence and learning needs following an online virtual simulation education programme with debriefing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2021 Nov;8(6):3045-3054. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1017. Epub 2021 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.1017
PMID:34331397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8441701/
Abstract

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a virtual simulation education programme with debriefing in undergraduate nursing students. Perceived clinical competence and learning needs of students in a simulation environment were also measured.

BACKGROUND

Evidence showed virtual simulation education programmes provided better knowledge acquisition. However, these studies to date did not incorporate virtual simulation in the combination of a debriefing model in nursing students.

DESIGN

A one-group pre-test and post-test design.

METHODS

188 final year undergraduate nursing students participated in the study. Linear mixed model analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of the programme.

RESULTS

Students have perceived a significant improvement in clinical competence and nursing process. Self-efficacy has also boosted. Communication and critical thinking were applied better in the traditional clinical environment.

CONCLUSION

Perceived clinical competence of Chinese nursing students has significant improvements by using virtual simulation combining a debriefing model during the COVID-19 period. Virtual simulation met students' learning needs. Future studies should include a control group for comparison and long-term measurement.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

The study provided an innovative clinical learning pedagogy to serve as a potential alternative with traditional clinical practicum during the COVID-19 period as this is substantially limited.

摘要

目的和目标

本研究旨在评估虚拟模拟教育计划对本科护理学生的影响。还测量了学生在模拟环境中的临床能力和学习需求。

背景

有证据表明,虚拟模拟教育计划可以更好地获取知识。然而,迄今为止,这些研究并未将虚拟模拟与护理学生的汇报模型结合使用。

设计

一组预测试和后测试设计。

方法

188 名应届本科护理学生参加了这项研究。进行线性混合模型分析以评估该计划的效果。

结果

学生在临床能力和护理过程方面都有明显的提高。自我效能感也有所提高。沟通和批判性思维在传统的临床环境中得到了更好的应用。

结论

在 COVID-19 期间,使用虚拟模拟结合汇报模型,中国护理学生的临床能力感知有显著提高。虚拟模拟满足了学生的学习需求。未来的研究应包括对照组进行比较和长期测量。

对临床实践的影响

本研究提供了一种创新的临床学习教学法,可以作为传统临床实习的潜在替代方案,因为传统临床实习在 COVID-19 期间受到了很大限制。