Suppr超能文献

106 个国家的 COVID-19 准备和应对计划:从卫生系统弹性角度的回顾。

COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plans from 106 countries: a review from a health systems resilience perspective.

机构信息

Universal Health Coverage and Life Course, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

World Health Organization Country Office, Monrovia, Liberia.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2022 Feb 8;37(2):255-268. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czab089.

Abstract

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has exposed long-standing fragmentation in health systems strengthening efforts for health security and universal health coverage while these objectives are largely interdependent and complementary. In this prevailing background, we reviewed countries' COVID-19 Preparedness and Response Plans (CPRPs) to assess the extent of integration of non-COVID-19 essential health service continuity considerations alongside emergency response activities. We searched for COVID-19 planning documents from governments and ministries of health, World Health Organization (WHO) country offices and United Nations (UN) country teams. We developed document review protocols using global guidance from the WHO and UN and the health systems resilience literature. After screening, we analysed 154 CPRPs from 106 countries. The majority of plans had a high degree of alignment with pillars of emergency response such as surveillance (99%), laboratory systems (96%) and COVID-19-specific case management (97%). Less than half considered maintaining essential health services (47%); 41% designated a mechanism for health system-wide participation in emergency planning; 34% considered subnational service delivery; 95% contained infection prevention and control (IPC) activities and 29% considered quality of care; and 24% were budgeted for and 7% contained monitoring and evaluation of essential health services. To improve, ongoing and future emergency planning should proactively include proportionate activities, resources and monitoring for essential health services to reduce excess mortality and morbidity. Specifically, this entails strengthening subnational health services with local stakeholder engagement in planning; ensuring a dedicated focus in emergency operations structures to maintain health systems resilience for non-emergency health services; considering all domains of quality in health services along with IPC; and building resilient monitoring capacity for timely and reliable tracking of health systems functionality including service utilization and health outcomes. An integrated approach to planning should be pursued as health systems recover from COVID-19 disruptions and take actions to build back better.

摘要

冠状病毒病(COVID-19)暴露了卫生系统强化工作在卫生安全和全民健康覆盖方面长期存在的碎片化问题,而这些目标在很大程度上是相互依存和相辅相成的。在此背景下,我们审查了各国的 COVID-19 防范和应对计划(CPRPs),以评估将非 COVID-19 基本卫生服务连续性考虑因素与应急响应活动相结合的程度。我们从各国政府和卫生部、世界卫生组织(WHO)国家办事处和联合国(UN)国家工作队搜索了 COVID-19 规划文件。我们使用来自世卫组织和联合国的全球指南以及卫生系统弹性文献制定了文件审查方案。经过筛选,我们分析了来自 106 个国家的 154 份 CPRP。大多数计划与应急响应支柱高度一致,如监测(99%)、实验室系统(96%)和 COVID-19 特定病例管理(97%)。不到一半的计划考虑维持基本卫生服务(47%);41%指定了卫生系统全面参与应急规划的机制;34%考虑了国家以下服务提供;95%包含感染预防和控制(IPC)活动,29%考虑了护理质量;24%为基本卫生服务编制了预算,7%包含了基本卫生服务的监测和评估。为了改进,正在进行和未来的应急规划应主动纳入基本卫生服务的适当活动、资源和监测,以减少过度的死亡率和发病率。具体而言,这需要通过地方利益攸关方参与规划来加强国家以下一级的卫生服务;确保在应急行动结构中专门关注维持非紧急卫生服务的卫生系统弹性;考虑卫生服务的所有质量领域以及 IPC;并建立有弹性的监测能力,以便及时可靠地跟踪卫生系统功能,包括服务利用和健康结果。在卫生系统从 COVID-19 中断中恢复并采取行动更好地重建时,应采取综合方法进行规划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fd3/8826778/ea8f932c0a34/czab089f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验