Suppr超能文献

新冠疫情下碎片化的卫生体系:纠正全球卫生安全与全民健康覆盖之间的错位。

Fragmented health systems in COVID-19: rectifying the misalignment between global health security and universal health coverage.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; Women in Global Health, Washington, DC, USA.

O'Neill Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Centre for Universal Health, Chatham House, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet. 2021 Jan 2;397(10268):61-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32228-5. Epub 2020 Dec 1.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has placed enormous strain on countries around the world, exposing long-standing gaps in public health and exacerbating chronic inequities. Although research and analyses have attempted to draw important lessons on how to strengthen pandemic preparedness and response, few have examined the effect that fragmented governance for health has had on effectively mitigating the crisis. By assessing the ability of health systems to manage COVID-19 from the perspective of two key approaches to global health policy-global health security and universal health coverage-important lessons can be drawn for how to align varied priorities and objectives in strengthening health systems. This Health Policy paper compares three types of health systems (ie, with stronger investments in global health security, stronger investments in universal health coverage, and integrated investments in global health security and universal health coverage) in their response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and synthesises four essential recommendations (ie, integration, financing, resilience, and equity) to reimagine governance, policies, and investments for better health towards a more sustainable future.

摘要

新冠疫情大流行给世界各国带来了巨大压力,暴露出公共卫生方面存在的长期差距,并加剧了长期存在的不平等现象。尽管研究和分析试图吸取有关如何加强大流行防范和应对的重要经验教训,但很少有研究考察碎片化的卫生治理对有效缓解危机的影响。通过从全球卫生政策的两个关键方法——全球卫生安全和全民健康覆盖的角度评估卫生系统管理新冠疫情的能力,可以为如何协调加强卫生系统的不同优先事项和目标提供重要经验。本卫生政策文件比较了三种类型的卫生系统(即对全球卫生安全有更强投资、对全民健康覆盖有更强投资、以及对全球卫生安全和全民健康覆盖有综合投资)在应对持续的新冠疫情大流行方面的反应,并综合提出了四项基本建议(即整合、融资、恢复力和公平),以重新构想治理、政策和投资,以实现更可持续的未来的更健康目标。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines in Botswana: a scoping review.博茨瓦纳新冠疫苗的公平可及性:一项范围综述
Front Health Serv. 2025 Jul 29;5:1609089. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2025.1609089. eCollection 2025.
5
The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on measles vaccination coverage.新冠疫情对麻疹疫苗接种覆盖率的影响。
Cad Saude Publica. 2025 Jul 18;41(6):e00183924. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XEN183924. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

4
COVID-19 - An Opportunity to Redesign Health Policy Thinking.COVID-19——重新设计卫生政策思维的契机。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Apr 1;11(4):409-413. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.132.
7
COVID-19: A perspective on Africa's capacity and response.COVID-19:对非洲能力和应对措施的看法。
J Med Virol. 2020 Nov;92(11):2465-2472. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26159. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
8
Healthier societies for healthy populations.为健康人群构建更健康的社会。
Lancet. 2020 Jun 6;395(10239):1747-1749. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31039-4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验