Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; Women in Global Health, Washington, DC, USA.
O'Neill Institute, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA; Centre for Universal Health, Chatham House, London, UK.
Lancet. 2021 Jan 2;397(10268):61-67. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32228-5. Epub 2020 Dec 1.
The COVID-19 pandemic has placed enormous strain on countries around the world, exposing long-standing gaps in public health and exacerbating chronic inequities. Although research and analyses have attempted to draw important lessons on how to strengthen pandemic preparedness and response, few have examined the effect that fragmented governance for health has had on effectively mitigating the crisis. By assessing the ability of health systems to manage COVID-19 from the perspective of two key approaches to global health policy-global health security and universal health coverage-important lessons can be drawn for how to align varied priorities and objectives in strengthening health systems. This Health Policy paper compares three types of health systems (ie, with stronger investments in global health security, stronger investments in universal health coverage, and integrated investments in global health security and universal health coverage) in their response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and synthesises four essential recommendations (ie, integration, financing, resilience, and equity) to reimagine governance, policies, and investments for better health towards a more sustainable future.
新冠疫情大流行给世界各国带来了巨大压力,暴露出公共卫生方面存在的长期差距,并加剧了长期存在的不平等现象。尽管研究和分析试图吸取有关如何加强大流行防范和应对的重要经验教训,但很少有研究考察碎片化的卫生治理对有效缓解危机的影响。通过从全球卫生政策的两个关键方法——全球卫生安全和全民健康覆盖的角度评估卫生系统管理新冠疫情的能力,可以为如何协调加强卫生系统的不同优先事项和目标提供重要经验。本卫生政策文件比较了三种类型的卫生系统(即对全球卫生安全有更强投资、对全民健康覆盖有更强投资、以及对全球卫生安全和全民健康覆盖有综合投资)在应对持续的新冠疫情大流行方面的反应,并综合提出了四项基本建议(即整合、融资、恢复力和公平),以重新构想治理、政策和投资,以实现更可持续的未来的更健康目标。