Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:102-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.07.031. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
Emergency departments (EDs) are highly valued settings for HIV screening. Most large-volume ED HIV screening programs have attenuated operational barriers by screening only ED patients who already have a blood sample available for other clinical reasons. Our objective was to estimate the proportion of HIV positive patients who are missed when an ED excludes patients for whom HIV screening would be the only indication to obtain a blood sample.
This cross-sectional analysis used existing electronic records of patients seen between 2017 and 2019 by an urban, academic ED and its HIV screening program, which includes patients regardless of whether they receive other ED blood testing. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients tested by the screening program who were newly diagnosed with HIV (Sample 1) for whom HIV screening would be the only indication for venipuncture. We secondarily 1) estimate the proportion of ED patients who received venipuncture using a representative sample of consecutively approached participants which prospectively recorded whether patients had blood obtained or intravenous catheter placement during usual ED care (Sample 2) and 2) report patient characteristics including HIV risk factors for those with and without ED venipuncture for both groups.
Of 41 persons newly diagnosed with HIV by the ED screening program (Sample 1), 13 (31.7%, 95%CI 18.6-48.2) did not undergo venipuncture for any reason other than their HIV test. The proportion of ED visits without a venipuncture (Sample 2) was 44.2% (95% CI 41.9-46.6). Patient characteristics were similar for both groups.
Screening only those patients with a blood sample already available or easily obtainable due to usual ED care, misses many opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis. Innovation in research, policy, and practice is needed to overcome still unaddressed barriers to ED HIV screening when HIV screening is the only indication for collection of a biological sample.
急诊科(ED)是进行 HIV 筛查的重要场所。大多数大容量 ED HIV 筛查项目通过仅对因其他临床原因已可获得血液样本的 ED 患者进行筛查,从而降低了操作障碍。我们的目的是估计当 ED 将那些 HIV 筛查将是获取血液样本的唯一指征的患者排除在外时,错过的 HIV 阳性患者的比例。
本横断面分析使用了 2017 年至 2019 年间在一家城市学术 ED 及其 HIV 筛查项目中就诊的现有电子病历,该项目包括无论是否接受其他 ED 血液检测的患者。主要结局是通过筛查项目检测的新诊断为 HIV(样本 1)的患者比例,这些患者的 HIV 筛查将是静脉穿刺的唯一指征。我们其次 1)使用连续纳入的患者代表性样本估计接受静脉穿刺的 ED 患者比例,该样本前瞻性地记录了在常规 ED 护理期间患者是否获得血液或静脉内导管放置(样本 2),2)报告了患者特征,包括接受和未接受 ED 静脉穿刺的患者的 HIV 危险因素。
在 ED 筛查项目中新诊断为 HIV 的 41 人中(样本 1),由于 HIV 检测以外的任何原因而未进行静脉穿刺的有 13 人(31.7%,95%CI 18.6-48.2)。未进行静脉穿刺的 ED 就诊比例为 44.2%(95%CI 41.9-46.6)。两组患者的特征相似。
仅对那些由于常规 ED 护理已经有或容易获得血液样本的患者进行筛查,会错失许多早期 HIV 诊断的机会。需要在研究、政策和实践方面进行创新,以克服当 HIV 筛查是采集生物样本的唯一指征时,仍然存在的 ED HIV 筛查障碍。