• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术治疗活胎剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的大出血风险预测。

Risk prediction of major haemorrhage with surgical treatment of live cesarean scar pregnancies.

机构信息

Institute for Women's Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Clinic for Gynecology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Sep;264:224-231. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.07.030. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.07.030
PMID:34332219
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association between demographic and ultrasound variables and major intra-operative blood loss during surgical transcervical evacuation of live caesarean scar pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary referral center between 2008 and 2019. We included all women diagnosed with a live caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy who chose to have surgical management in the study center. A preoperative ultrasound was performed in each patient. All women underwent transcervical suction curettage under ultrasound guidance. Our primary outcome was the rate of postoperative blood transfusion. The secondary outcomes were estimated intra-operative blood loss (ml), rate of retained products of conception, need for repeat surgery, need for uterine artery embolization and hysterectomy rate. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the variables. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed using the relevant covariates to identify the significant predictors for severe blood loss.

RESULTS

During the study period, 80 women were diagnosed with a live caesarean scar pregnancy, of whom 62 (78%) opted for surgical management at our center. The median crown-rump length was 9.3 mm (range 1.4-85.7). Median blood loss at the time of surgery was 100 ml (range, 10-2300), and six women (10%; 95%CI 3.6-20) required blood transfusion. Crown-rump length and presence of placental lacunae were significant predictive factors for the need for blood transfusion and blood loss > 500 ml at univariate analysis (p < .01); on multivariate analysis, only crown-rump length was a significant predictor for need for blood transfusion (OR = 1.072; 95% CI 1.02-1.11). Blood transfusion was required in 6/18 (33%) cases with the crown-rump length ≥ 23 mm (≥9 weeks of gestation), but in none of 44 women presenting with a crown-rump length < 23 mm (p < .01).

CONCLUSION

The risk of severe intraoperative bleeding and need for blood transfusion during or after surgical evacuation of live caesarean scar pregnancies increases with gestational age and is higher in the presence of placental lacunae. One third of women presenting at ≥ 9 weeks of gestation required blood transfusion and their treatment should be ideally arranged in specialized tertiary centers.

摘要

目的

评估人口统计学和超声变量与经宫颈清除活剖宫产瘢痕妊娠术中主要失血量之间的关系。

研究设计

这是一项 2008 年至 2019 年在三级转诊中心进行的回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了所有选择在研究中心进行手术治疗的活剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的妇女。每位患者均进行术前超声检查。所有患者均在超声引导下行经宫颈吸引刮宫术。我们的主要结局是术后输血率。次要结局包括估计术中失血量(ml)、妊娠产物残留率、需要再次手术、需要子宫动脉栓塞术和子宫切除术率。采用描述性统计方法描述变量。使用相关协变量构建单变量和多变量逻辑回归模型,以确定严重出血的显著预测因素。

结果

在研究期间,80 名妇女被诊断为活剖宫产瘢痕妊娠,其中 62 名(78%)选择在我们中心进行手术治疗。头臀长中位数为 9.3mm(范围 1.4-85.7)。手术时中位出血量为 100ml(范围 10-2300),6 名妇女(10%;95%CI 3.6-20)需要输血。头臀长和胎盘腔隙的存在是输血和出血量>500ml 的单变量分析的显著预测因素(p<.01);多变量分析显示,只有头臀长是输血需求的显著预测因素(OR=1.072;95%CI 1.02-1.11)。在头臀长≥23mm(≥9 孕周)的 18 例患者中,有 6 例(33%)需要输血,但在头臀长<23mm 的 44 例患者中,无一例需要输血(p<.01)。

结论

经宫颈清除活剖宫产瘢痕妊娠术中严重出血和输血的风险随孕龄增加而增加,且胎盘腔隙存在时风险更高。三分之一的妊娠≥9 周的妇女需要输血,她们的治疗应在专门的三级中心进行。

相似文献

1
Risk prediction of major haemorrhage with surgical treatment of live cesarean scar pregnancies.手术治疗活胎剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的大出血风险预测。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Sep;264:224-231. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.07.030. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
2
Surgical evacuation combined with Shirodkar cervical suture and selective uterine artery embolization: A fertility preserving treatment for 10-15 weeks' live cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies.手术清除联合 Shirodkar 宫颈缝合术和选择性子宫动脉栓塞术:10-15 周有生机剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的一种保留生育力治疗方法。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Jun;103(6):1054-1062. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14803. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
3
Surgical treatment of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided suction curettage.超声引导下吸引刮宫术治疗剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的疗效及安全性。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;47(4):511-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.15857.
4
Development of the utero-placental circulation in cesarean scar pregnancies: a case-control study.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠子宫胎盘循环的发展:一项病例对照研究。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Mar;226(3):399.e1-399.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.08.056. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
5
Efficacy of Shirodkar cervical suture in securing hemostasis following surgical evacuation of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy.希罗德卡尔宫颈缝合术在剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠手术清除术后止血中的疗效。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;30(1):95-100. doi: 10.1002/uog.4058.
6
[Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: combined modality therapies with uterine artery embolization before surgical procedure].剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠:手术前联合子宫动脉栓塞的综合治疗方法
Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2015 Mar;43(3):191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
7
Cesarean Scar Pregnancy, Incidence, and Recurrence: Five-Year Experience at a Single Tertiary Care Referral Center.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠:发生率和复发——单中心 5 年经验。
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;132(5):1285-1295. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002940.
8
Risk factors for intra-operative haemorrhage and bleeding risk scoring system for caesarean scar pregnancy: a case-control study.剖宫产瘢痕妊娠术中出血的危险因素及出血风险评分系统:一项病例对照研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015 Dec;195:141-145. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015.06.023. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
9
Surgical evacuation of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的手术治疗。
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Jul;89:102361. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102361. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
10
First-trimester prediction of surgical outcome in abnormally invasive placenta using the cross-over sign.经阴道超声“交叉征”预测前置胎盘穿透性植入手术结局
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;51(2):184-188. doi: 10.1002/uog.17440. Epub 2018 Jan 5.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoring system predicts the adverse outcomes for cesarean scar pregnancy treated with transvaginal hysterotomy.一种评分系统可预测经阴道子宫切开术治疗剖宫产瘢痕妊娠的不良结局。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025 Jun 6;15(6):5086-5100. doi: 10.21037/qims-24-1337. Epub 2025 Jun 3.
2
A protocol for developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set for caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy research: COSCAR.一项关于制定、传播和实施剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠研究核心结局集的方案:COSCAR
Trials. 2025 Jun 4;26(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08879-7.
3
Uterine Artery Embolization: A Growing Pillar of Gynecological Intervention.
子宫动脉栓塞术:妇科干预领域不断壮大的支柱。
J Radiol Clin Imaging. 2025;8(1):1-17. doi: 10.26502/jrci.2809105. Epub 2025 Feb 4.
4
A prediction nomogram for residual after negative pressure aspiration for endogenic cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a retrospective study.内源性剖宫产瘢痕妊娠负压吸宫术后残留的预测列线图:一项回顾性研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Feb 3;25(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07255-2.
5
Risk of intraoperative hemorrhage during cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy surgery: development and validation of an interpretable machine learning prediction model.剖宫产瘢痕部位异位妊娠手术中术中出血的风险:一种可解释的机器学习预测模型的开发与验证
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Nov 29;78:102969. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102969. eCollection 2024 Dec.
6
Outcome Reporting in Studies Investigating Treatment for Caesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠治疗研究的结果报告:一项系统评价
BJOG. 2025 Feb;132(3):278-287. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17989. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
7
Diagnostic and management challenges of a rare case of caesarean scar pregnancy in a low-resource setting: a case report.资源匮乏地区剖宫产瘢痕妊娠罕见病例的诊断与管理挑战:一例病例报告
SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2024 Sep 25;12:2050313X241286670. doi: 10.1177/2050313X241286670. eCollection 2024.
8
Prevalence, Determinants, and Management Options of Scar Site Pregnancy in Women With Previous Cesarean Section: A Study From the Al-Qassim Region.既往剖宫产女性瘢痕部位妊娠的患病率、影响因素及管理方案:来自卡西姆地区的一项研究
Cureus. 2024 Jul 31;16(7):e65874. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65874. eCollection 2024 Jul.
9
Surgical evacuation combined with Shirodkar cervical suture and selective uterine artery embolization: A fertility preserving treatment for 10-15 weeks' live cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies.手术清除联合 Shirodkar 宫颈缝合术和选择性子宫动脉栓塞术:10-15 周有生机剖宫产瘢痕部位妊娠的一种保留生育力治疗方法。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024 Jun;103(6):1054-1062. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14803. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
10
Clinical value of ultrasonic indicators in predicting the outcome of caesarean scar pregnancy after pregnancy termination.超声指标在预测终止妊娠后剖宫产瘢痕妊娠结局中的临床价值。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Dec 15;23(1):863. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06197-x.