Emergency Department, The First People's Hospital of Kunshan, Suzhou 215006, China.
School of Nursing, Medical College, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.
Int Emerg Nurs. 2021 Sep;58:101041. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2021.101041. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
The Pediatric Assessment Triangle (PAT) is a rapid evaluation tool that establishes a child's clinical status and his or her category of illness in order to direct initial management priorities. However, only few studies have examined its accuracy in assessing triage of critically ill patients in the emergency pediatric department (EPD) in China.
To quantitatively validate the accuracy in assessing critically ill medical children and nurses' acceptance of PAT in the EPD.
This is a prospective observational study performed at The First People's Hospital of Kunshan from January to May 2019. Ill children arriving to the EPD were assessed by trained nurses with the PAT and Pediatric early warning score (PEWS) at the same time. The five-level triage system used as the gold standard for comparing the accuracy of PAT was tracked following the triage. PEWS was compared with PAT in terms of assessment time and the degree of nurse' acceptance.
A total of 1608 subjects were included in this study, of whom 74 were critically ill. The AUROCC to screen out the critical children evaluated by PAT was 0.963. When the cut-off value of PAT score was 1, its sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 93.24%, 99.15%, 84.15% and 99.67%, respectively. The maximum value of the YI of PAT scored with 1 was 0.924. For the different categories of diseases, PAT had a better performance in assessing non-respiratory critical diseases (vs. respiratory critical diseases), with values of AUROCC of 0.986 vs 0.930, YI of 0.969 vs 0.858, respectively. For the different age of sick children, PAT had a better performance in assessing critical diseases in children aged 1 to 36 months (vs. 3 to 14 years), with values of AUROCC of 0.978 and 0.899, YI of 0.952 and 0.797, respectively. The assessment time of PAT was 13.81 ± 6.41 s, while PEWS score was 37.24 ± 10.29 s (t = 17.27, p < 0.001). The VAS scores of nurses' acceptance of PAT and PEWS were 9.27 ± 0.87 and 8.57 ± 1.52, respectively.
PAT can be used as a rapid and effective assessment tool in emergency triage in China. When a child's PAT score is 1 or more, the child's condition is critical and priority treatment should be arranged.
儿科评估三角(PAT)是一种快速评估工具,用于确定儿童的临床状况及其疾病类别,以便指导初始管理优先级。然而,在中国,仅有少数研究检验了其在评估急诊儿科部门(EPD)危重症患儿分诊中的准确性。
定量验证 PAT 评估危重症患儿的准确性以及护士对 PAT 在 EPD 中的接受程度。
这是一项前瞻性观察研究,于 2019 年 1 月至 5 月在昆山市第一人民医院进行。由经过培训的护士同时使用 PAT 和儿科预警评分(PEWS)对到达 EPD 的患儿进行评估。采用五级分诊系统作为比较 PAT 准确性的金标准,对分诊后患儿的情况进行跟踪。比较 PEWS 与 PAT 的评估时间和护士接受程度。
本研究共纳入 1608 例患儿,其中 74 例为危重症患儿。PAT 筛查出的危重症患儿的 AUROCC 为 0.963。当 PAT 评分的截断值为 1 时,其灵敏度、特异度、PPV 和 NPV 分别为 93.24%、99.15%、84.15%和 99.67%。PAT 评分 1 分的最大 YI 值为 0.924。对于不同疾病类别,PAT 在评估非呼吸危重症疾病(与呼吸危重症疾病相比)时表现更好,AUROCC 值分别为 0.986 与 0.930,YI 值分别为 0.969 与 0.858。对于不同年龄的患儿,PAT 在评估 1 至 36 月龄患儿的危重症疾病时表现更好,AUROCC 值分别为 0.978 和 0.899,YI 值分别为 0.952 和 0.797。PAT 的评估时间为 13.81±6.41s,而 PEWS 评分为 37.24±10.29s(t=17.27,p<0.001)。护士对 PAT 和 PEWS 的接受程度的 VAS 评分分别为 9.27±0.87 和 8.57±1.52。
PAT 可作为中国急诊分诊的一种快速有效的评估工具。当患儿的 PAT 评分达到 1 分或更高时,患儿病情危急,应安排优先治疗。