Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Neurosurgery. 2021 Sep 15;89(4):672-679. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyab245.
Pediatric brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are a significant cause of morbidity but the role of multimodal therapy in the treatment of these lesions is not well understood.
To compare the outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with and without prior embolization for pediatric AVMs.
We retrospectively evaluated the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation pediatric AVM database. AVMs were categorized, based on use of pre-embolization (E + SRS) or lack thereof (SRS-only). Outcomes were compared in unadjusted and inverse probability weight (IPW)-adjusted models. Favorable outcome was defined as obliteration without post-SRS hemorrhage or permanent radiation-induced changes (RIC).
The E + SRS and SRS-only cohorts comprised 91 and 448 patients, respectively. In unadjusted models, the SRS-only cohort had higher rates of obliteration (68.5% vs 43.3%, < .001) and favorable outcome (61.2% vs 36.3%, P < .001) but a lower rate of symptomatic RIC (9.0% vs 16.7%, P = .031). The IPW-adjusted rates of every outcome were similar between the 2 cohorts. However, cumulative obliteration rates at 3, 5, 8, and 10 yr remained higher in the absence of prior embolization (46.3%, 64.6%, 72.6%, and 77.4% for SRS-only vs 24.4%, 37.2%, 44.1%, and 48.7% for E + SRS cohorts, respectively; SHR = 0.449 [0.238-0.846], P = .013).
Embolization appears to decrease cumulative obliteration rates after SRS for pediatric AVMs without affecting the risk of post-treatment hemorrhage or adverse radiation effects arguing against the routine use of pre-SRS embolization. While endovascular therapy can be considered for occlusion of high-risk angioarchitectural features prior to SRS, future studies are necessary to clarify its role.
儿科脑动静脉畸形(AVM)是发病率的重要原因,但多模态治疗在这些病变治疗中的作用尚不清楚。
比较立体定向放射外科(SRS)联合与不联合血管内栓塞治疗儿科 AVM 的结果。
我们回顾性评估了国际放射外科研究基金会儿科 AVM 数据库。根据是否使用血管内栓塞(E+SRS)将 AVM 分为 E+SRS 组和 SRS 组。在未调整和逆概率权重(IPW)调整模型中比较了结果。良好的结果定义为 SRS 后无出血或永久性放射性诱导变化(RIC)的闭塞。
E+SRS 组和 SRS 组分别包含 91 例和 448 例患者。在未调整模型中,SRS 组的闭塞率(68.5%比 43.3%,<.001)和良好结果率(61.2%比 36.3%,P<.001)更高,但症状性 RIC 率较低(9.0%比 16.7%,P=.031)。2 组间所有结果的 IPW 调整后发生率相似。然而,在没有预先栓塞的情况下,3、5、8 和 10 年的累积闭塞率仍较高(SRS 组分别为 46.3%、64.6%、72.6%和 77.4%,E+SRS 组分别为 24.4%、37.2%、44.1%和 48.7%;SHR=0.449[0.238-0.846],P=.013)。
血管内栓塞似乎会降低 SRS 治疗儿科 AVM 后的累积闭塞率,但不会增加治疗后出血或不良反应的风险,因此不支持常规进行 SRS 前栓塞。虽然血管内治疗可考虑用于 SRS 前闭塞高风险血管解剖特征,但仍需进一步研究以明确其作用。