Suppr超能文献

脑动静脉畸形立体定向放射外科治疗:栓塞与非栓塞对比

Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Versus Without Embolization for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.

作者信息

Chen Ching-Jen, Ding Dale, Lee Cheng-Chia, Kearns Kathryn N, Pomeraniec I Jonathan, Cifarelli Christopher P, Arsanious David E, Liscak Roman, Hanuska Jaromir, Williams Brian J, Yusuf Mehran B, Woo Shiao Y, Ironside Natasha, Warnick Ronald E, Trifiletti Daniel M, Mathieu David, Mureb Monica, Benjamin Carolina, Kondziolka Douglas, Feliciano Caleb E, Rodriguez-Mercado Rafael, Cockroft Kevin M, Simon Scott, Mackley Heath B, Zammar Samer, Patel Neel T, Padmanaban Varun, Beatson Nathan, Saylany Anissa, Lee John, Sheehan Jason P

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.

出版信息

Neurosurgery. 2021 Jan 13;88(2):313-321. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa418.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior comparisons of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) treated using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without embolization were inherently flawed, due to differences in the pretreatment nidus volumes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of embolization and SRS, vs SRS alone for AVMs using pre-embolization malformation features.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed International Radiosurgery Research Foundation AVM databases from 1987 to 2018. Patients were categorized into the embolization and SRS (E + SRS) or SRS alone (SRS-only) cohorts. The 2 cohorts were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores. Primary outcome was defined as AVM obliteration. Secondary outcomes were post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, radiologic and symptomatic radiation-induced changes (RIC), and cyst formation.

RESULTS

The matched cohorts each comprised 101 patients. Crude AVM obliteration rates were similar between the matched E + SRS vs SRS-only cohorts (48.5% vs 54.5%; odds ratio = 0.788, P = .399). Cumulative probabilities of obliteration at 3, 4, 5, and 6 yr were also similar between the E + SRS (33.0%, 46.4%, 56.2%, and 60.8%, respectively) and SRS-only (32.9%, 46.2%, 56.0%, and 60.6%, respectively) cohorts (subhazard ratio (SHR) = 1.005, P = .981). Cumulative probabilities of radiologic RIC at 3, 4, 5, and 6 yr were lower in the E + SRS (25.0%, 25.7%, 26.7%, and 26.7%, respectively) vs SRS-only (45.3%, 46.2%, 47.8%, and 47.8%, respectively) cohort (SHR = 0.478, P = .004). Symptomatic and asymptomatic embolization-related complication rates were 8.3% and 18.6%, respectively. Rates of post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, symptomatic RIC, and cyst formation were similar between the matched cohorts.

CONCLUSION

This study refutes the prevalent notion that AVM embolization negatively affects the likelihood of obliteration after SRS.

摘要

背景

由于治疗前畸形灶体积存在差异,既往对采用立体定向放射外科手术(SRS)联合或不联合栓塞治疗脑动静脉畸形(AVM)的比较存在固有缺陷。

目的

利用栓塞前畸形特征,比较AVM栓塞联合SRS与单纯SRS的治疗效果。

方法

我们回顾性分析了1987年至2018年国际放射外科研究基金会的AVM数据库。患者被分为栓塞联合SRS(E+SRS)组或单纯SRS(仅SRS)组。使用倾向评分以1:1的比例对两组进行匹配。主要结局定义为AVM闭塞。次要结局包括SRS后出血、全因死亡率、放射学和有症状的放射诱导改变(RIC)以及囊肿形成。

结果

匹配后的两组各包含101例患者。匹配后的E+SRS组与仅SRS组之间的粗AVM闭塞率相似(48.5%对54.5%;优势比=0.788,P=0.399)。E+SRS组与仅SRS组在3、4、5和6年时的累积闭塞概率也相似(分别为33.0%、46.4%、56.2%和60.8%)以及(分别为32.9%、46.2%、56.0%和60.6%)(亚风险比(SHR)=1.005,P=0.981)。E+SRS组在3、4、5和6年时放射学RIC的累积概率低于仅SRS组(分别为25.0%、25.7%、26.7%和26.7%)与(分别为45.3%、46.2%、47.8%和47.8%)(SHR=0.478,P=0.004)。有症状和无症状的栓塞相关并发症发生率分别为8.3%和18.6%。匹配后的两组之间SRS后出血、全因死亡率、有症状的RIC和囊肿形成的发生率相似。

结论

本研究反驳了普遍认为的AVM栓塞会对SRS后闭塞可能性产生负面影响的观点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验