• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CO 排放量如何响应政府规模和数字化水平的变化?来自金砖国家的证据。

How CO emissions respond to changes in government size and level of digitalization? Evidence from the BRICS countries.

机构信息

China Center for Special Economic Zone Research, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.

出版信息

Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(1):457-467. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15693-6. Epub 2021 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1007/s11356-021-15693-6
PMID:34333752
Abstract

The role of government size and digitization in the process of environmental quality is a matter of considerable debate in the field of environmental economics. BRICS economies have suffered from environmental pollution. This paper scrutinizes that how CO emissions respond to government size and digitization in BRICS economies. Empirical estimates of the ARDL approach show that government size has a positive impact on CO in Brazil, India, and China, while negative impact on CO in Russia in the long run. The long-run estimates reveal a negative and significant effect of digitization on CO in Brazil, India, and China. Education and e-learning activities have a favorable and crucial role played in environmental quality in Brazil, India, and China. Based on these findings, BRICS authorities should improve the efficiency of government expenditures and invest more in digitization to improve the quality of the environment.

摘要

政府规模和数字化在环境质量过程中的作用是环境经济学领域的一个重要争论点。金砖国家经济深受环境污染之苦。本文考察了 CO 排放如何响应金砖国家经济中的政府规模和数字化。ARDL 方法的实证估计表明,从长期来看,政府规模对巴西、印度和中国的 CO 排放有正向影响,而对俄罗斯的 CO 排放有负向影响。长期估计显示,数字化对巴西、印度和中国的 CO 排放有负向和显著的影响。教育和电子学习活动在巴西、印度和中国的环境质量方面发挥了有利和关键的作用。基于这些发现,金砖国家当局应该提高政府支出的效率,并加大对数字化的投资,以改善环境质量。

相似文献

1
How CO emissions respond to changes in government size and level of digitalization? Evidence from the BRICS countries.CO 排放量如何响应政府规模和数字化水平的变化?来自金砖国家的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(1):457-467. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15693-6. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
2
Analysis of income inequality and environmental pollution in BRICS using fresh asymmetric approach.金砖国家收入不平等与环境污染的非对称分析
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Oct;28(37):51199-51209. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14209-6. Epub 2021 May 12.
3
Environmental benefit of clean energy consumption: can BRICS economies achieve environmental sustainability through human capital?清洁能源消费的环境效益:金砖国家经济体能否通过人力资本实现环境可持续性?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(5):6766-6776. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16167-5. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
4
Asymmetric effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on carbon emissions of BRICS economies: evidence from nonlinear panel autoregressive distributed lag model.能源效率和可再生能源对金砖国家经济碳排放的非对称影响:来自非线性面板自回归分布滞后模型的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(15):18254-18268. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08353-8. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
5
Caring for the environment: how CO2 emissions respond to human capital in BRICS economies?关爱环境:金砖国家经济的人力资本如何影响二氧化碳排放?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Mar;29(12):18036-18046. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17025-0. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
6
On the remittances-environment led hypothesis: Empirical evidence from BRICS economies.基于汇款-环境假说的实证研究:来自金砖国家经济体的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(14):16460-16471. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07999-8. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
7
Mitigations pathways towards sustainable development: assessing the influence of higher education on environmental quality in BRICS economies.实现可持续发展的缓解途径:评估金砖国家经济体中高等教育对环境质量的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(57):86851-86858. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21772-z. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
8
The direct and indirect effects of democracy on carbon dioxide emissions in BRICS countries: evidence from panel quantile regression.金砖国家中民主对二氧化碳排放的直接和间接影响:面板分位数回归的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Sep;27(26):33085-33102. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09167-4. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
9
Geopolitical risks, energy consumption, and CO emissions in BRICS: an asymmetric analysis.金砖国家的地缘政治风险、能源消耗和二氧化碳排放:非对称分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Aug;28(29):39668-39679. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13505-5. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
10
Exploring the impact of innovation, renewable energy consumption, and income on CO2 emissions: new evidence from the BRICS economies.探讨创新、可再生能源消费和收入对二氧化碳排放的影响:来自金砖国家经济体的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(12):13866-13881. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07876-4. Epub 2020 Feb 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Implications of circular economy, digitalization and technological innovation to achieve sustainable environmental goal: Pre and post-vision 2030.循环经济、数字化和技术创新对实现可持续环境目标的影响:2030年愿景前后
Heliyon. 2024 May 9;10(10):e30978. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30978. eCollection 2024 May 30.
2
The impact of the digital economy on creative industries development: Empirical evidence based on the China.数字经济对创意产业发展的影响:基于中国的实证证据。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 6;19(3):e0299232. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299232. eCollection 2024.
3
Digital economy, spatial spillover and industrial green innovation efficiency: Empirical evidence from China.
数字经济、空间溢出与产业绿色创新效率:来自中国的实证证据
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 13;9(1):e12875. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12875. eCollection 2023 Jan.
4
Role of digitalization in environment, social and governance, and sustainability: Review-based study for implications.数字化在环境、社会与治理以及可持续发展中的作用:基于综述的影响研究。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 30;13:961057. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.961057. eCollection 2022.
5
Moving towards Environmental Sustainability: Can Digital Economy Reduce Environmental Degradation in China?迈向环境可持续性:数字经济能否减少中国的环境恶化?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 23;19(23):15540. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315540.
6
Coupling Coordination Measurement and Evaluation of Urban Digitalization and Green Development in China.中国城市数字化与绿色发展的耦合协调测度与评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 21;19(22):15379. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215379.
7
Can the digital economy development curb carbon emissions? Evidence from China.数字经济发展能抑制碳排放吗?来自中国的证据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 2;13:938918. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.938918. eCollection 2022.
8
Economic Freedom, Education and CO Emissions: A Causality Analysis for EU Member States.经济自由、教育与二氧化碳排放:对欧盟成员国的因果关系分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 30;19(13):8061. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19138061.