China Center for Special Economic Zone Research, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE), Islamabad, Pakistan.
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Aug;28(29):39668-39679. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13505-5. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
Environmental pollution is a geopolitical problem, and researchers have not considered it seriously yet. This study examines the asymmetric influence of geopolitical risk on energy consumption and CO emissions in BRICS economies using the non-linear autoregressive distributed lag model (NARDL) testing method over the period of 1985-2019. Therefore, we observed that in the long run, a positive and negative change in geopolitical risk has negative effect on energy consumption in India, Brazil, and China. The outcomes confirmed that an increase in geopolitical risk has negative effect on CO emissions in Russia and South Africa. Although a decrease in geopolitical risk has negative effects on CO emissions in India, China, South Africa, it has positive coefficient in Russia in the long run. Based on empirical findings, we also revealed that asymmetries mostly exist in terms of magnitude rather than direction. Our empirical results are country and group specific. The findings call for important changes in energy and environment policies to accommodate geopolitical risks.
环境污染是一个地缘政治问题,但研究人员尚未对此给予足够重视。本研究使用非平稳自回归分布滞后模型(NARDL)检验方法,考察了 1985-2019 年期间,地缘政治风险对金砖国家经济能源消费和 CO2 排放的非对称影响。结果表明,从长期来看,地缘政治风险的正向和负向变化对印度、巴西和中国的能源消费都有负面影响。研究结果还证实,地缘政治风险的增加对俄罗斯和南非的 CO2 排放有负面影响。尽管从长期来看,地缘政治风险的降低对印度、中国和南非的 CO2 排放有负面影响,但对俄罗斯的 CO2 排放则有正系数。根据实证结果,我们还发现,非对称性主要体现在幅度上,而不是方向上。我们的实证结果是针对具体国家和集团的。这些发现呼吁对能源和环境政策进行重大调整,以适应地缘政治风险。