School of Psychology, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.
University of Otago Christchurch, University of Otago, Christchurch.
Brain Inj. 2021 Jul 29;35(9):1103-1111. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1959062. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
In this study, we examined the psychometric properties of measures of psychological flexibility in a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) sample.
Adults who sustained a mTBI (n = 112) completed the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - Acquired Brain Injury reactive avoidance subscale (AAQ-ABI (RA). Exploratory factor analysis and Rasch analysis were conducted to evaluate the facture structure, dimensionality, and differential item functioning. Construct validity was determined by correlating the AAQ-ABI (RA) with the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Revised (AAQ-II) and Fear Avoidance after Traumatic Brain Injury (FAB-TBI).
The AAQ-ABI (RA) was found to have strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.87). Consistent with previous findings, the AAQ-ABI (RA) had one distinct factor. Fit to the unidimensional Rasch model was adequate ( (18) = 22.5, = .21) with no evidence of differential item functioning across person factors examined. The AAQ-ABI (RA) also had expected relationships with theoretically relevant constructs.
The AAQ-ABI (RA) appears to be a psychometrically sound measure of psychological flexibility in mTBI.
在这项研究中,我们考察了心理灵活性测量在轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)样本中的心理测量特性。
患有 mTBI 的成年人(n=112)完成了接受与行动问卷-脑损伤反应回避分量表(AAQ-ABI(RA)。进行了探索性因素分析和 Rasch 分析,以评估结构、维度和差异项目功能。通过将 AAQ-ABI(RA)与接受与行动问卷修订版(AAQ-II)和创伤性脑损伤后恐惧回避(FAB-TBI)进行相关性分析,确定了结构效度。
AAQ-ABI(RA)具有很强的内部一致性(Cronbach's α=0.87)。与先前的发现一致,AAQ-ABI(RA)具有一个独特的因素。单维 Rasch 模型的拟合程度适中((18)=22.5,=0.21),没有证据表明个体因素之间存在差异项目功能。AAQ-ABI(RA)与理论上相关的结构也有预期的关系。
AAQ-ABI(RA)似乎是 mTBI 中心理灵活性的一种心理测量可靠的测量工具。