• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Measuring psychological flexibility and cognitive defusion in individuals with acquired brain injury.测量后天性脑损伤患者的心理灵活性和认知去融合。
Brain Inj. 2021 Aug 24;35(10):1301-1307. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1972155. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
2
Validating measures of psychological flexibility in a population with acquired brain injury.验证后天性脑损伤人群心理灵活性的测量方法。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Jun;27(2):415-23. doi: 10.1037/pas0000050. Epub 2014 Nov 24.
3
Psychological flexibility in mild traumatic brain injury: an evaluation of measures.轻度创伤性脑损伤中的心理灵活性:评估方法。
Brain Inj. 2021 Jul 29;35(9):1103-1111. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1959062. Epub 2021 Aug 1.
4
The role of psychological flexibility in appearance anxiety in people who have experienced a visible burn injury.心理灵活性在经历可见性烧伤损伤人群的外貌焦虑中的作用。
Burns. 2019 Jun;45(4):942-949. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.11.015. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
5
The Development and Validation of the Comprehensive Assessment of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Processes (CompACT)-Malay Version.接受和承诺疗法过程综合评估工具(CompACT)-马来语版本的编制与验证。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9624. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159624.
6
The ACTyourCHANGE study protocol: promoting a healthy lifestyle in patients with obesity with Acceptance and Commitment Therapy-a randomized controlled trial.ACTyourCHANGE 研究方案:通过接纳与承诺疗法促进肥胖患者的健康生活方式——一项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2021 Apr 20;22(1):290. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05191-y.
7
The cognitive fusion questionnaire: a preliminary study of psychometric properties and prediction of functioning in chronic pain.认知融合问卷:心理测量特性及慢性疼痛功能预测的初步研究
Clin J Pain. 2014 Oct;30(10):894-901. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000047.
8
[Measurement of pain-related experiential avoidance: analysis of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II-Pain in patients with chronic pain].[疼痛相关经验性回避的测量:慢性疼痛患者的接纳与行动问卷-II-疼痛分析]
Schmerz. 2021 Dec;35(6):401-411. doi: 10.1007/s00482-021-00537-6. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
9
Psychometric properties of the Valuing Questionnaire in a Spaniard sample and factorial equivalence with a Colombian sample.《价值观问卷在西班牙样本中的心理测量学特性及其与哥伦比亚样本的因子等效性》
PeerJ. 2022 Jan 6;10:e12670. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12670. eCollection 2022.
10
Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Social Anxiety - Acceptance and Action Questionnaire.社交焦虑接纳与行动问卷波斯语版本的心理测量特性
Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2016 May 28;10(2):e3753. doi: 10.17795/ijpbs.3753. eCollection 2016 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Link between post-stroke psychopathology and scope-of-action awareness.中风后精神病理学与行动范围意识之间的联系。
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2024 Oct 25;17:17562864241282633. doi: 10.1177/17562864241282633. eCollection 2024.
2
Acceptance and commitment therapy for individuals with depressive and anxiety symptoms following acquired brain injury: A non-concurrent multiple baseline design across four cases.接受和承诺疗法治疗脑损伤后抑郁和焦虑症状个体:四个案例的非同期多项基线设计。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2023 Jul;33(6):1018-1048. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2022.2053169. Epub 2022 Mar 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Number of traumatic brain injuries and temporal associations with depression: A register-based cohort study.颅脑创伤的数量及其与抑郁的时间关联:一项基于登记的队列研究。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021 Oct;144(4):407-414. doi: 10.1111/acps.13347. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
2
Defining and measuring "psychological flexibility": A narrative scoping review of diverse flexibility and rigidity constructs and perspectives.定义和测量“心理灵活性”:对不同灵活性和僵化结构及观点的叙述性范围综述
Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Mar;84:101973. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.101973. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
3
The management of depression following traumatic brain injury: A systematic review with meta-analysis.颅脑损伤后抑郁的管理:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Brain Inj. 2020 Aug 23;34(10):1287-1304. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2020.1797169. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
4
Understanding psychological flexibility: A multimethod exploration of pursuing valued goals despite the presence of distress.理解心理灵活性:尽管存在困扰,但仍追求有价值目标的多方法探索。
Psychol Assess. 2020 Sep;32(9):829-850. doi: 10.1037/pas0000834. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
5
Modelling associations between neurocognition and functional course in young people with emerging mental disorders: a longitudinal cohort study.建模精神障碍起病青少年的神经认知与功能病程之间的关联:一项纵向队列研究。
Transl Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 21;10(1):22. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-0726-9.
6
The BrainACT study: acceptance and commitment therapy for depressive and anxiety symptoms following acquired brain injury: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.BrainACT研究:获得性脑损伤后抑郁和焦虑症状的接受与承诺疗法:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2019 Dec 27;20(1):773. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3952-9.
7
Psychological flexibility: positive implications for mental health and life satisfaction.心理灵活性:对心理健康和生活满意度的积极影响。
Health Promot Int. 2020 Apr 1;35(2):312-320. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daz036.
8
Can acceptance and commitment therapy facilitate psychological adjustment after a severe traumatic brain injury? A pilot randomized controlled trial.接纳与承诺疗法能否促进严重创伤性脑损伤后的心理调整?一项初步的随机对照试验。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020 Aug;30(7):1348-1371. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2019.1583582. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
9
Anxiety after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis.卒中后焦虑:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Rehabil Med. 2018 Sep 28;50(9):769-778. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2384.
10
Experiential Avoidance: An Examination of the Construct Validity of the AAQ-II and MEAQ.经验回避:AAQ-II 和 MEAQ 结构效度的检验。
Behav Ther. 2018 May;49(3):435-449. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

测量后天性脑损伤患者的心理灵活性和认知去融合。

Measuring psychological flexibility and cognitive defusion in individuals with acquired brain injury.

机构信息

Limburg Brain Injury Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Department of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Brain Inj. 2021 Aug 24;35(10):1301-1307. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1972155. Epub 2021 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1080/02699052.2021.1972155
PMID:34487472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10791065/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is used increasingly for individuals with psychological distress following acquired brain injury (ABI) in different countries. However, questionnaires measuring ACT-processes are often not validated for this patient group and need cross-cultural validation. This study investigated the psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for Acquired Brain Injury (AAQ-ABI; measuring psychological flexibility related to thoughts and feelings about ABI) and the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ-7; measuring cognitive defusion).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Score distribution, reliability, and convergent validity of the AAQ-ABI and the CFQ-7 were examined in Dutch individuals with ABI.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients with ABI were included. The AAQ-ABI showed good reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.87) and the CFQ-7 excellent reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.97). Both did not show a floor or ceiling effect, nor a skewed distribution. There were strong to moderate correlations between the questionnaires and measures of psychological flexibility, mood, quality of life, and value-driven behavior (AAQ-ABI: r = -0.70-0.81; CFQ-7 = -0.67-0.84). Inter-item total correlations indicate that the questions within each questionnaire measured the same construct (AAQ-ABI: r = 0.40-0.78; CFQ-7: r = 0.84-0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study shows that the Dutch AAQ-ABI and CFQ-7 have acceptable to good psychometric properties when measuring psychological flexibility and cognitive defusion in patients with ABI.

摘要

目的

接受与承诺疗法(ACT)在不同国家越来越多地用于因脑损伤(ABI)而出现心理困扰的个体。然而,用于测量 ACT 过程的问卷通常未经此患者群体验证,需要进行跨文化验证。本研究调查了脑损伤后接受性与行动问卷(AAQ-ABI;测量与 ABI 相关的思维和感觉的心理灵活性)和认知融合问卷(CFQ-7;测量认知离解)的心理测量特性。

材料和方法

在荷兰 ABI 个体中,检查了 AAQ-ABI 和 CFQ-7 的得分分布、信度和聚合效度。

结果

共纳入 73 名 ABI 患者。AAQ-ABI 显示出良好的信度(Cronbach's α=0.87),CFQ-7 显示出极好的信度(Cronbach's α=0.97)。两者均未显示出地板或天花板效应,也没有偏态分布。问卷与心理灵活性、情绪、生活质量和价值驱动行为的测量指标之间存在强到中度的相关性(AAQ-ABI:r=-0.70-0.81;CFQ-7=-0.67-0.84)。条目间总分相关表明每个问卷中的问题测量的是相同的结构(AAQ-ABI:r=0.40-0.78;CFQ-7:r=0.84-0.93)。

结论

目前的研究表明,荷兰的 AAQ-ABI 和 CFQ-7 在测量 ABI 患者的心理灵活性和认知离解时具有可接受至良好的心理测量特性。