Suppr超能文献

中文版身体意象接纳与行动问卷的效度验证及身体意象灵活性在身体不满与心理困扰关系中的中介作用

Validation of the Chinese Version of the Body Image Acceptance and Action Questionnaire and the Mediating Role of Body Image Flexibility in the Relationship Between Body Dissatisfaction and Psychological Distress.

作者信息

He Jinbo, Cai Zhihui, Chen Xinjie, Lu Tom, Fan Xitao

机构信息

The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen.

Central China Normal University.

出版信息

Behav Ther. 2021 May;52(3):539-551. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

Abstract

The psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Body Image Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (C-BI-AAQ) and its short form (C-BI-AAQ-5) were examined with a sample of Chinese undergraduates (n =1,068, 52.6% female). The factor structure, measurement reliability, measurement invariance across gender, and latent gender mean difference of the two scales were explored. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to examine the factor structure of the C-BI-AAQ and the C-BI-AAQ-5. The original one-factor structure was replicated for both the C-BI-AAQ and the C-BI-AAQ-5. Both the C-BI-AAQ and C-BI-AAQ-5 showed good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity (e.g., relationship patterns in the expected directions with theoretically similar psychological flexibility, and with theoretically dissimilar body dissatisfaction, and psychological distress). The C-BI-AAQ-5 was shown to be equivalent to the C-BI-AAQ. Furthermore, strict measurement invariance across gender was confirmed for both the C-BI-AAQ and C-BI-AAQ-5, and latent mean difference tests showed that men had higher levels of body image flexibility than women. Thus, both the C-BI-AAQ and C-BI-AAQ-5 appear to be psychometrically sound instruments for use in the Chinese young adult population. In addition, body image flexibility measured by both the C-BI-AAQ and the C-BI-AAQ-5 fully mediated the relationship between body dissatisfaction and psychological distress.

摘要

本研究以中国大学生样本(n = 1068,52.6%为女性)对中文版身体意象接纳与行动问卷(C-BI-AAQ)及其简版(C-BI-AAQ-5)的心理测量学特性进行了考察。探讨了这两个量表的因子结构、测量信度、性别间测量不变性以及潜在性别均值差异。采用验证性因子分析考察C-BI-AAQ和C-BI-AAQ-5的因子结构。C-BI-AAQ和C-BI-AAQ-5均重复了原有的单因子结构。C-BI-AAQ和C-BI-AAQ-5均表现出良好的内部一致性、重测信度、聚合效度和区分效度(例如,与理论上相似的心理灵活性、理论上不同的身体不满和心理困扰呈预期方向的关系模式)。结果表明C-BI-AAQ-5与C-BI-AAQ等效。此外,证实了C-BI-AAQ和C-BI-AAQ-5在性别上具有严格的测量不变性,潜在均值差异检验表明男性的身体意象灵活性水平高于女性。因此,C-BI-AAQ和C-BI-AAQ-5似乎都是适用于中国年轻成人人群的心理测量学上可靠的工具。此外,C-BI-AAQ和C-BI-AAQ-5所测量的身体意象灵活性完全中介了身体不满与心理困扰之间的关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验