• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药剂师参与吸入器选择可改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的肺功能:一项前瞻性单臂研究。

Pharmacist involvement in the inhaler choice improves lung function in patients with COPD: a prospective single-arm study.

作者信息

Shiwaku Eiji, Dote Satoshi, Kaneko Shinobu, Hei Chisato, Aikawa Masaki, Sakai Yuki, Kawai Takahiro, Iwatsubo Shigeaki, Hashimoto Michinobu, Tsuneishi Teppei, Nishimura Tomoko, Iwata Toshiyuki, Hira Daiki, Terada Tomohiro, Nishimura Takashi, Kobayashi Yuka

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Kyoto-Katsura Hospital, 17, Yamadahiraocho, Kyoto-shi Nishikyo-ku, Kyoto, 615-8256, Japan.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kyoto-Katsura Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2021 Aug 2;7(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40780-021-00211-0.

DOI:10.1186/s40780-021-00211-0
PMID:34334137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8327440/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, in Japan, shifting tasks from physician to hospital pharmacist is being developed to reduce physician workload and improve the quality of pharmacotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the effects of pharmacist involvement in the choice of inhaler as the task on the clinical outcomes of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

This prospective, single-center, single-arm study included 36 outpatients with newly diagnosed COPD indicating inhaler therapy. Eligible patients were immediately interviewed by pharmacist. Then, pharmacist assessed patient's inhalation flow rate, physical function to handle an inhaler, comprehension, and value, and finally recommended a personalized inhaler based on originally developed inhaler choice protocol, and pulmonologist prescribed a pharmacist-selected inhaler. The primary endpoint was the improvement in trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV) between baseline and week 26. The secondary endpoints were safety, and improvements at week 26 in scores for the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), modified British Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC), and Adherence Starts with Knowledge-20 (ASK-20).

RESULTS

The pneumonologists completely agreed with the pharmacist-recommended inhaler. Mean FEV significantly increased from baseline to week 26 (1.60, SD 0.54 L vs. 1.98, SD 0.56 L; p < 0.0001). Significant improvements in CAT, mMRC, and ASK-20 scores were also observed. The prevalence of CAT responders as a negative predictor of acute exacerbation, defined as those with a decrease in CAT score of ≥2 points from baseline, was 86%. None of the patients experienced exacerbation during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Pharmacist involvement in the choice of inhaler for patients with newly diagnosed COPD was associated with improved lung function, health status, clinical symptoms, and adherence to inhaler therapy. Shifting task of choosing appropriate inhaler from physician to hospital pharmacist may be performed effectively and safely with an inhaler choice protocol.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000039722 , retrospectively registered on March 10, 2020.

摘要

背景

目前在日本,为减轻医生工作量并提高药物治疗质量,正致力于将任务从医生转移至医院药剂师。本研究旨在调查药剂师参与吸入器选择任务对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者临床结局的影响。

方法

这项前瞻性、单中心、单臂研究纳入了36例新诊断为COPD且需吸入器治疗的门诊患者。符合条件的患者立即接受药剂师的访谈。然后,药剂师评估患者的吸入流速、操作吸入器的身体功能、理解能力和价值观,最后根据最初制定的吸入器选择方案推荐个性化吸入器,肺科医生开具药剂师选择的吸入器。主要终点是基线至第26周期间1秒用力呼气容积(FEV)的改善情况。次要终点是安全性,以及第26周时慢性阻塞性肺疾病评估测试(CAT)、改良英国医学研究委员会呼吸困难量表(mMRC)和知识促进依从性-20(ASK-20)评分的改善情况。

结果

肺科医生完全同意药剂师推荐的吸入器。从基线到第26周,平均FEV显著增加(1.60,标准差0.54L对1.98,标准差0.56L;p<0.0001)。CAT、mMRC和ASK-20评分也有显著改善。作为急性加重的阴性预测指标,CAT应答者(定义为CAT评分较基线降低≥2分者)的患病率为86%。在研究期间,没有患者出现病情加重。

结论

药剂师参与新诊断COPD患者吸入器的选择与肺功能、健康状况、临床症状改善以及吸入器治疗依从性提高有关。通过吸入器选择方案,将选择合适吸入器的任务从医生转移至医院药剂师可能是有效且安全的。

试验注册号

UMIN000039722,于2020年3月10日进行回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf5/8327440/514b8c928aaf/40780_2021_211_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf5/8327440/8c6584c6d161/40780_2021_211_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf5/8327440/7d27684c4e12/40780_2021_211_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf5/8327440/514b8c928aaf/40780_2021_211_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf5/8327440/8c6584c6d161/40780_2021_211_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf5/8327440/7d27684c4e12/40780_2021_211_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0cf5/8327440/514b8c928aaf/40780_2021_211_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Pharmacist involvement in the inhaler choice improves lung function in patients with COPD: a prospective single-arm study.药剂师参与吸入器选择可改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的肺功能:一项前瞻性单臂研究。
J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2021 Aug 2;7(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40780-021-00211-0.
2
The Relationship Between the "Adherence Starts with Knowledge-20" Questionnaire and Clinical Factors in Patients with COPD: A Multi-Center, Cross-Sectional Study.“遵医始于知-20”问卷与 COPD 患者临床因素的关系:一项多中心、横断面研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Dec 4;15:3201-3211. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S280464. eCollection 2020.
3
Impact of Pharmacist-Led Intervention on Adherence to Inhalers, Inhalation Technique, and Disease Control Among Asthma/COPD Patients in a Resource Limited Center: An Interventional Study.药师主导的干预措施对资源有限中心哮喘/慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者吸入器依从性、吸入技术和疾病控制的影响:一项干预性研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jul 1;18:1395-1408. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S460810. eCollection 2024.
4
Once-daily single-inhaler versus twice-daily multiple-inhaler triple therapy in patients with COPD: lung function and health status results from two replicate randomized controlled trials.在 COPD 患者中,每日一次单吸入器与每日两次多吸入器三联疗法的比较:来自两项复制随机对照试验的肺功能和健康状况结果。
Respir Res. 2020 May 29;21(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01360-w.
5
Single inhaler triple therapy versus inhaled corticosteroid plus long-acting β2-agonist therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (TRILOGY): a double-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.三联吸入治疗与吸入性皮质类固醇加长效β2-激动剂治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(TRILOGY):一项双盲、平行组、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2016 Sep 3;388(10048):963-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31354-X. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
6
Interventional, Quasi-Experimental Study of a Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Education Care Plan for Hospital Discharge.慢性阻塞性肺疾病出院教育护理计划的干预性、准实验性研究
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Dec 16;9(4):202. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9040202.
7
Benefits of glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler (GFF MDI) in improving lung function and reducing exacerbations in patients with moderate-to-very severe COPD: a pooled analysis of the PINNACLE studies.在改善中重度至极重度 COPD 患者的肺功能和减少恶化方面,格隆溴铵/福莫特罗富马酸盐定量吸入器(GFF MDI)的获益:PINNACLE 研究的汇总分析。
Respir Res. 2020 May 25;21(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01388-y.
8
Use and inhalation technique of inhaled medication in patients with asthma and COPD: data from a randomized controlled trial.哮喘和 COPD 患者吸入药物的使用和吸入技术:一项随机对照试验的数据。
Respir Res. 2018 Dec 3;19(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0936-3.
9
Critical Inhaler Handling Error Is an Independent Risk Factor for Frequent Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Interim Results of a Single Center Prospective Study.吸入器使用严重失误是慢性阻塞性肺疾病频繁急性加重的独立危险因素:一项单中心前瞻性研究的中期结果
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019 Dec 2;14:2767-2775. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S234774. eCollection 2019.
10
Efficacy and safety of once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) versus FF/VI in patients with inadequately controlled asthma (CAPTAIN): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3A trial.每日一次单吸入器三联疗法(FF/UMEC/VI)与FF/VI治疗哮喘控制不佳患者的疗效和安全性(CAPTAIN):一项双盲、随机、3A期试验
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Jan;9(1):69-84. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30389-1. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventional, Quasi-Experimental Study of a Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Education Care Plan for Hospital Discharge.慢性阻塞性肺疾病出院教育护理计划的干预性、准实验性研究
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Dec 16;9(4):202. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9040202.

本文引用的文献

1
The Relationship Between the "Adherence Starts with Knowledge-20" Questionnaire and Clinical Factors in Patients with COPD: A Multi-Center, Cross-Sectional Study.“遵医始于知-20”问卷与 COPD 患者临床因素的关系:一项多中心、横断面研究。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2020 Dec 4;15:3201-3211. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S280464. eCollection 2020.
2
Efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol versus umeclidinium and salmeterol monotherapies in symptomatic patients with COPD not receiving inhaled corticosteroids: the EMAX randomised trial.在未接受吸入性皮质类固醇治疗的 COPD 症状患者中,乌美溴铵/维兰特罗与乌美溴铵和沙美特罗单药治疗的疗效:EMAX 随机试验。
Respir Res. 2019 Oct 30;20(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12931-019-1193-9.
3
Treatment response in COPD: does FEV say it all? A analysis of the CRYSTAL study.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的治疗反应:FEV能说明一切吗?CRYSTAL研究的分析
ERJ Open Res. 2019 Feb 25;5(1). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00243-2018. eCollection 2019 Feb.
4
Adherence to inhaled therapy and its impact on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).吸入疗法的依从性及其对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的影响。
BMC Pulm Med. 2018 Oct 19;18(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12890-018-0724-3.
5
Differences in Adherence Barriers to Inhaled Medicines between Japanese Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Asthma Evaluated using the "Adherence Starts with Knowledge 20" (ASK-20) Questionnaire.使用“依从性始于知识20”(ASK - 20)问卷评估日本慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者和哮喘患者吸入药物依从性障碍的差异。
Intern Med. 2019 Jan 15;58(2):175-185. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.0488-17. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
6
The impact of patient education and shared decision making on hospital readmissions for COPD.患者教育与共同决策对慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者再次入院的影响。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Apr 24;13:1325-1332. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S154414. eCollection 2018.
7
Once-Daily Triple Therapy in Patients with COPD: Patient-Reported Symptoms and Quality of Life.慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的每日一次三联疗法:患者报告的症状和生活质量。
Adv Ther. 2018 Jan;35(1):56-71. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0650-4. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
8
Structured pharmacist-led intervention programme to improve medication adherence in COPD patients: A randomized controlled study.结构型药剂师主导的干预方案对改善 COPD 患者用药依从性的影响:一项随机对照研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2018 Oct;14(10):909-914. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
9
Comparative Efficacy of Once-Daily Umeclidinium/Vilanterol and Tiotropium/Olodaterol Therapy in Symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Study.每日一次乌美溴铵/维兰特罗与噻托溴铵/奥达特罗治疗有症状慢性阻塞性肺疾病的疗效比较:一项随机研究。
Adv Ther. 2017 Nov;34(11):2518-2533. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0626-4. Epub 2017 Nov 1.
10
Efficacy of protocol-based pharmacotherapy management on anticoagulation with warfarin for patients with cardiovascular surgery.基于方案的药物治疗管理对心血管手术患者华法林抗凝治疗的疗效
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017 Oct;42(5):591-597. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12560. Epub 2017 May 15.