Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK.
Respir Res. 2020 May 29;21(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01360-w.
BACKGROUND: The comparative efficacy of inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β-agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) triple therapy administered via single or multiple inhalers in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been evaluated comprehensively. We conducted two replicate trials comparing single- with multiple-inhaler ICS/LAMA/LABA combination in COPD. METHODS: 207608 and 207609 were Phase IV, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, triple-dummy non-inferiority trials comparing once-daily fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100/62.5/25 μg via Ellipta inhaler, with twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR) 400/12 μg via metered-dose inhaler plus once-daily tiotropium (TIO) 18 μg via HandiHaler. Patients had symptomatic COPD and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV) < 50% predicted, or FEV < 80% predicted and ≥ 2 moderate or 1 severe exacerbations in the prior year. The primary endpoint in both trials was weighted mean change from baseline (wmCFB) in 0-24-h FEV at Week 12. Secondary endpoints included CFB in trough FEV at Day 84 and 85. Other endpoints included serial FEV and health status outcomes at Week 12. Safety was evaluated descriptively. RESULTS: The modified per-protocol population included 720 and 711 patients in studies 207608 and 207609 (intent-to-treat population: 728 and 732). FF/UMEC/VI was non-inferior to BUD/FOR+TIO for wmCFB in 0-24-h FEV at Week 12 (Study 207608 treatment difference [95% confidence interval]: 15 mL [- 13, 43]; Study 207609: 11 mL [- 20, 41]). FF/UMEC/VI improved trough FEV CFB versus BUD/FOR+TIO at Day 84 and 85 (Day 85 treatment difference: Study 207608: 38 mL [10, 66]; Study 207609: 51 mL [21, 82]) and FEV at 12 and 24 h post-morning dose at Week 12 in both studies. No treatment differences were seen in health status outcomes. Safety profiles were similar between treatments; pneumonia occurred in 7 (< 1%) patients with FF/UMEC/VI and 9 (1%) patients with BUD/FOR+TIO, across both studies. CONCLUSIONS: FF/UMEC/VI was non-inferior to BUD/FOR+TIO for wmCFB in 0-24-h FEV at Week 12 in patients with COPD. Greater improvements in trough and serial FEV measurements at Week 12 with FF/UMEC/VI versus BUD/FOR+TIO, together with similar health status improvements and safety outcomes including the incidence of pneumonia, suggest that once-daily single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI triple therapy is a viable option for patients looking to simplify their treatment regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: GSK (207608/207609; NCT03478683/NCT03478696).
背景:在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,吸入皮质类固醇/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂/长效β-激动剂(ICS/LAMA/LABA)三联疗法通过单一或多种吸入器给药的疗效比较尚未得到全面评估。我们进行了两项复制试验,比较了 COPD 中单一与多种吸入器 ICS/LAMA/LABA 联合用药。
方法:207608 和 207609 是两项为期 12 周、随机、双盲、三盲非劣效性试验,比较了每日一次氟替卡松糠酸酯/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI)100/62.5/25μg 通过 Ellipta 吸入器与每日两次布地奈德/福莫特罗(BUD/FOR)400/12μg 通过计量吸入器加每日一次噻托溴铵(TIO)18μg 通过 HandiHaler 的疗效。患者患有有症状的 COPD,用力呼气量 1 秒(FEV)<预测值的 50%,或 FEV <预测值的 80%且过去 1 年中至少有 2 次中度或 1 次重度加重。两项试验的主要终点均为第 12 周 0-24 小时 FEV 的加权平均变化(wmCFB)。次要终点包括第 84 和 85 天谷值 FEV 的 CFB。其他终点包括第 12 周时的 FEV 和健康状况的变化。安全性进行了描述性评估。
结果:修改后的符合方案人群包括 207608 研究和 207609 研究中的 720 名和 711 名患者(意向治疗人群:728 名和 732 名)。FF/UMEC/VI 在第 12 周时的 wmCFB 方面不劣于 BUD/FOR+TIO(研究 207608 治疗差异[95%置信区间]:15ml[-13,43];研究 207609:11ml[-20,41])。FF/UMEC/VI 在第 84 天和第 85 天改善了谷值 FEV CFB,与 BUD/FOR+TIO 相比(第 85 天治疗差异:研究 207608:38ml[10,66];研究 207609:51ml[21,82]),并且在第 12 周和第 24 小时早晨剂量后 12 小时和 24 小时内的 FEV 也有改善。在健康状况方面没有观察到治疗差异。两种治疗的安全性特征相似;在两项研究中,分别有 7 名(<1%)接受 FF/UMEC/VI 治疗的患者和 9 名(1%)接受 BUD/FOR+TIO 治疗的患者发生肺炎。
结论:在 COPD 患者中,第 12 周时 0-24 小时 FEV 的 wmCFB 方面,FF/UMEC/VI 不劣于 BUD/FOR+TIO。FF/UMEC/VI 较 BUD/FOR+TIO 改善了第 12 周时谷值和系列 FEV 测量值,并且健康状况改善相似,包括肺炎的发生率,表明每日一次单一吸入器 FF/UMEC/VI 三联疗法是一种可行的选择,适用于希望简化治疗方案的患者。
试验注册:GSK(207608/207609;NCT03478683/NCT03478696)。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019-12-6
J Clin Med. 2024-10-17
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019-2-13
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019-2-19
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019-2-1
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018-12-12
BMC Pulm Med. 2018-10-19
Respir Care. 2018-6
N Engl J Med. 2018-4-18