文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

在 COPD 患者中,每日一次单吸入器与每日两次多吸入器三联疗法的比较:来自两项复制随机对照试验的肺功能和健康状况结果。

Once-daily single-inhaler versus twice-daily multiple-inhaler triple therapy in patients with COPD: lung function and health status results from two replicate randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills, MI, USA.

GlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK.

出版信息

Respir Res. 2020 May 29;21(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12931-020-01360-w.


DOI:10.1186/s12931-020-01360-w
PMID:32471423
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7257245/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The comparative efficacy of inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β-agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) triple therapy administered via single or multiple inhalers in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been evaluated comprehensively. We conducted two replicate trials comparing single- with multiple-inhaler ICS/LAMA/LABA combination in COPD. METHODS: 207608 and 207609 were Phase IV, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, triple-dummy non-inferiority trials comparing once-daily fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) 100/62.5/25 μg via Ellipta inhaler, with twice-daily budesonide/formoterol (BUD/FOR) 400/12 μg via metered-dose inhaler plus once-daily tiotropium (TIO) 18 μg via HandiHaler. Patients had symptomatic COPD and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV) < 50% predicted, or FEV < 80% predicted and ≥ 2 moderate or 1 severe exacerbations in the prior year. The primary endpoint in both trials was weighted mean change from baseline (wmCFB) in 0-24-h FEV at Week 12. Secondary endpoints included CFB in trough FEV at Day 84 and 85. Other endpoints included serial FEV and health status outcomes at Week 12. Safety was evaluated descriptively. RESULTS: The modified per-protocol population included 720 and 711 patients in studies 207608 and 207609 (intent-to-treat population: 728 and 732). FF/UMEC/VI was non-inferior to BUD/FOR+TIO for wmCFB in 0-24-h FEV at Week 12 (Study 207608 treatment difference [95% confidence interval]: 15 mL [- 13, 43]; Study 207609: 11 mL [- 20, 41]). FF/UMEC/VI improved trough FEV CFB versus BUD/FOR+TIO at Day 84 and 85 (Day 85 treatment difference: Study 207608: 38 mL [10, 66]; Study 207609: 51 mL [21, 82]) and FEV at 12 and 24 h post-morning dose at Week 12 in both studies. No treatment differences were seen in health status outcomes. Safety profiles were similar between treatments; pneumonia occurred in 7 (< 1%) patients with FF/UMEC/VI and 9 (1%) patients with BUD/FOR+TIO, across both studies. CONCLUSIONS: FF/UMEC/VI was non-inferior to BUD/FOR+TIO for wmCFB in 0-24-h FEV at Week 12 in patients with COPD. Greater improvements in trough and serial FEV measurements at Week 12 with FF/UMEC/VI versus BUD/FOR+TIO, together with similar health status improvements and safety outcomes including the incidence of pneumonia, suggest that once-daily single-inhaler FF/UMEC/VI triple therapy is a viable option for patients looking to simplify their treatment regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: GSK (207608/207609; NCT03478683/NCT03478696).

摘要

背景:在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,吸入皮质类固醇/长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂/长效β-激动剂(ICS/LAMA/LABA)三联疗法通过单一或多种吸入器给药的疗效比较尚未得到全面评估。我们进行了两项复制试验,比较了 COPD 中单一与多种吸入器 ICS/LAMA/LABA 联合用药。

方法:207608 和 207609 是两项为期 12 周、随机、双盲、三盲非劣效性试验,比较了每日一次氟替卡松糠酸酯/乌美溴铵/维兰特罗(FF/UMEC/VI)100/62.5/25μg 通过 Ellipta 吸入器与每日两次布地奈德/福莫特罗(BUD/FOR)400/12μg 通过计量吸入器加每日一次噻托溴铵(TIO)18μg 通过 HandiHaler 的疗效。患者患有有症状的 COPD,用力呼气量 1 秒(FEV)<预测值的 50%,或 FEV <预测值的 80%且过去 1 年中至少有 2 次中度或 1 次重度加重。两项试验的主要终点均为第 12 周 0-24 小时 FEV 的加权平均变化(wmCFB)。次要终点包括第 84 和 85 天谷值 FEV 的 CFB。其他终点包括第 12 周时的 FEV 和健康状况的变化。安全性进行了描述性评估。

结果:修改后的符合方案人群包括 207608 研究和 207609 研究中的 720 名和 711 名患者(意向治疗人群:728 名和 732 名)。FF/UMEC/VI 在第 12 周时的 wmCFB 方面不劣于 BUD/FOR+TIO(研究 207608 治疗差异[95%置信区间]:15ml[-13,43];研究 207609:11ml[-20,41])。FF/UMEC/VI 在第 84 天和第 85 天改善了谷值 FEV CFB,与 BUD/FOR+TIO 相比(第 85 天治疗差异:研究 207608:38ml[10,66];研究 207609:51ml[21,82]),并且在第 12 周和第 24 小时早晨剂量后 12 小时和 24 小时内的 FEV 也有改善。在健康状况方面没有观察到治疗差异。两种治疗的安全性特征相似;在两项研究中,分别有 7 名(<1%)接受 FF/UMEC/VI 治疗的患者和 9 名(1%)接受 BUD/FOR+TIO 治疗的患者发生肺炎。

结论:在 COPD 患者中,第 12 周时 0-24 小时 FEV 的 wmCFB 方面,FF/UMEC/VI 不劣于 BUD/FOR+TIO。FF/UMEC/VI 较 BUD/FOR+TIO 改善了第 12 周时谷值和系列 FEV 测量值,并且健康状况改善相似,包括肺炎的发生率,表明每日一次单一吸入器 FF/UMEC/VI 三联疗法是一种可行的选择,适用于希望简化治疗方案的患者。

试验注册:GSK(207608/207609;NCT03478683/NCT03478696)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f3/7257245/7ffc2374d9bd/12931_2020_1360_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f3/7257245/fa96f154b251/12931_2020_1360_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f3/7257245/94ebc621756b/12931_2020_1360_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f3/7257245/ad1a6690c26f/12931_2020_1360_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f3/7257245/73f060af79dc/12931_2020_1360_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f3/7257245/7ffc2374d9bd/12931_2020_1360_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f3/7257245/fa96f154b251/12931_2020_1360_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f3/7257245/94ebc621756b/12931_2020_1360_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f3/7257245/ad1a6690c26f/12931_2020_1360_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f3/7257245/73f060af79dc/12931_2020_1360_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e6f3/7257245/7ffc2374d9bd/12931_2020_1360_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Once-daily single-inhaler versus twice-daily multiple-inhaler triple therapy in patients with COPD: lung function and health status results from two replicate randomized controlled trials.

Respir Res. 2020-5-29

[2]
Single-inhaler fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone furoate/vilanterol plus umeclidinium using two inhalers for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomized non-inferiority study.

Respir Res. 2018-1-25

[3]
Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) Triple Therapy Compared with Other Therapies for the Treatment of COPD: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Adv Ther. 2022-9

[4]
Efficacy and safety of once-daily single-inhaler triple therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) versus FF/VI in patients with inadequately controlled asthma (CAPTAIN): a double-blind, randomised, phase 3A trial.

Lancet Respir Med. 2021-1

[5]
24-Hour Serial Spirometric Assessment of Once-Daily Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Versus Twice-Daily Budesonide/Formoterol in Patients with COPD: Analysis of the FULFIL Study.

Adv Ther. 2020-12

[6]
Comparative Efficacy of Once-Daily Umeclidinium/Vilanterol and Tiotropium/Olodaterol Therapy in Symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Randomized Study.

Adv Ther. 2017-11-1

[7]
The IMPACT Study - Single Inhaler Triple Therapy (FF/UMEC/VI) Versus FF/VI And UMEC/VI In Patients With COPD: Efficacy And Safety In A Japanese Population.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019-12-6

[8]
Effect of Recent Exacerbation History on the Efficacy of Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Triple Therapy in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in the FULFIL Trial.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2022

[9]
Efficacy of FF/UMEC/VI compared with FF/VI and UMEC/VI in patients with COPD: subgroup analysis of the Spain cohort in IMPACT.

Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2020

[10]
Effect of Age on the Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple-Therapy Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Patients With COPD: A Post Hoc Analysis of the Informing the Pathway of COPD Treatment Trial.

Chest. 2021-3

引用本文的文献

[1]
Real-World Effectiveness of Single-Inhaler Triple Treatment Through Assorted Respiratory Outcomes When Switched From Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapies (RESTART): A Prospective Cohort Study of Korean Patients With COPD.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2025-4-11

[2]
Evaluation of comparative efficacy of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus other bronchodilators in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

BMC Pulm Med. 2024-12-18

[3]
Triple Therapy De-Escalation and Withdrawal of Inhaled Corticosteroids to Dual Bronchodilator Therapy in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

J Clin Med. 2024-10-18

[4]
Triple Therapy in COPD in Real Life: Is It Better to Use Single or Multiple Inhalers?

J Clin Med. 2024-10-17

[5]
Adherence to single inhaler triple therapy and digital inhalers in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: a literature review and protocol for a randomized controlled trial (TRICOLON study).

BMC Pulm Med. 2024-7-4

[6]
Comparative effectiveness and safety of triple therapy and non-triple therapy interventions for COPD: an overview of systematic reviews.

Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2024

[7]
Intraclass comparison of inhaled corticosteroids for the risk of pneumonia in chronic obstructive pulmonary airway disorder: a network meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Int J Clin Pharm. 2024-8

[8]
Outcomes Following Initiation of Triple Therapy with Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol versus Multiple-Inhaler Triple Therapy Among Medicare Advantage with Part D Beneficiaries and Those Commercially Enrolled for Health Care Insurance in the United States.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2024

[9]
A Response to: Letter to the Editor Regarding "Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol (FF/UMEC/VI) Triple Therapy Compared with Other Therapies for the Treatment of COPD: A Network Meta-analysis".

Adv Ther. 2023-5

[10]
COPD Exacerbations, Costs, and Health Care Resource Utilization Before and After Initiation of Fluticasone Furoate/Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Routine Care in the USA.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2023

本文引用的文献

[1]
AMPLIFY: a randomized, Phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of aclidinium/formoterol vs monocomponents and tiotropium in patients with moderate-to-very severe symptomatic COPD.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019-3-22

[2]
When to use single-inhaler triple therapy in COPD: a practical approach for primary care health care professionals.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019-2-13

[3]
Medication adherence and persistence in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients receiving triple therapy in a USA commercially insured population.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2019-2-19

[4]
Inhaled therapies and cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2019-2-1

[5]
Triple therapy (ICS/LABA/LAMA) in COPD: time for a reappraisal.

Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018-12-12

[6]
Adherence to inhaled therapy and its impact on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

BMC Pulm Med. 2018-10-19

[7]
Triple therapy with budesonide/glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate with co-suspension delivery technology versus dual therapies in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (KRONOS): a double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3 randomised controlled trial.

Lancet Respir Med. 2018-9-16

[8]
Adherence in Asthma and COPD: New Strategies for an Old Problem.

Respir Care. 2018-6

[9]
Once-Daily Single-Inhaler Triple versus Dual Therapy in Patients with COPD.

N Engl J Med. 2018-4-18

[10]
Extrafine inhaled triple therapy versus dual bronchodilator therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (TRIBUTE): a double-blind, parallel group, randomised controlled trial.

Lancet. 2018-2-9

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索