Suppr超能文献

非转移性前列腺癌中雄激素剥夺单一疗法的使用情况:来自八个欧洲国家的结果。

Androgen deprivation monotherapy usage in non-metastatic prostate cancer: results from eight European countries.

作者信息

Mitropoulos Dionysios, Chlosta Piotr, Häggman Michael, Ström Torbjorn, Markussis Vyron

机构信息

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, 1 Department of Urology, Athens, Greece.

Jagiellonian University, Department of Urology, Cracow, Poland.

出版信息

Cent European J Urol. 2021;74(2):161-168. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2021.0343.R1. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to investigate the attitudes towards use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as monotherapy for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer (PC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A survey using a 28-item, structured, quantitative questionnaire about the management of patients with PC was conducted in eight European countries between February and May 2018. Survey recipients were selected from a private database of healthcare providers.

RESULTS

Overall, 375 physicians completed the survey (response rate, 58%). Participants were urologists (71.2%) or medical oncologists (28.8%), with a mean practice duration of 19.9 years and with university hospital or cancer center (41.6%), non-teaching hospital (38.4%) or private-sector clinic (20.0%) affiliations. Median proportions of physicians considering ADT as monotherapy to treat patients with PC in different risk groups varied between countries, but overall were: high/very high-risk, 60%; intermediate-risk, 30%; low-risk, 7.5%. The use of ADT monotherapy in the different risk groups also varied by medical specialty and type of affiliation. Proportions of participants applying different target thresholds for testosterone (T) levels also varied by country, but overall were: <50 ng/dL, 29.9%; <32 ng/dL, 4.8%; <20 ng/dL, 54.3%; castration but no specific target, 11%. More than half of participants (58.7%) determined target T levels only when prostate-specific antigen level was increased.

CONCLUSIONS

Our multinational survey provides evidence that PC management varies across European countries and with clinical context, and frequently diverges from European Association of Urology (EAU) - European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) - European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) - International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG) guidelines. Strategies for effective implementation of evidence-based recommendations in clinical practice may be needed to optimize patient outcomes.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是调查对于将雄激素剥夺疗法(ADT)作为局限性或局部晚期前列腺癌(PC)单一疗法的态度。

材料与方法

2018年2月至5月期间,在八个欧洲国家开展了一项调查,使用一份包含28个条目的结构化定量问卷,内容涉及PC患者的管理。调查对象从医疗服务提供者的私人数据库中选取。

结果

总体而言,375名医生完成了调查(回复率为58%)。参与者为泌尿外科医生(71.2%)或医学肿瘤学家(28.8%),平均执业年限为19.9年,分别隶属于大学医院或癌症中心(41.6%)、非教学医院(38.4%)或私立诊所(20.0%)。不同国家的医生将ADT作为单一疗法治疗不同风险组PC患者的比例中位数有所不同,但总体情况如下:高/极高风险组为60%;中风险组为30%;低风险组为7.5%。ADT单一疗法在不同风险组中的使用情况也因医学专业和所属机构类型而异。应用不同睾酮(T)水平目标阈值的参与者比例也因国家而异,但总体情况如下:<50 ng/dL,29.9%;<32 ng/dL,4.8%;<20 ng/dL,54.3%;去势但无特定目标,1'1%。超过一半的参与者(58.7%)仅在前列腺特异性抗原水平升高时才确定目标T水平。

结论

我们的多国调查表明,PC的管理在欧洲各国以及不同临床背景下存在差异,且常常与欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)-欧洲放射治疗与肿瘤学会(ESTRO)-欧洲泌尿生殖放射学会(ESUR)-国际老年肿瘤学会(SIOG)的指南不一致。可能需要采取策略在临床实践中有效实施基于证据的建议,以优化患者预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9771/8318023/8398d9bbdfab/CEJU-74-0343.R1-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验