Farid Huma, Stack-Dunniber Hannah, Molina Rose, Nosal Catherine, Mendiola Monica, Hacker Michele
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachussetts, Worcester, USA.
Cureus. 2021 Jun 28;13(6):e15993. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15993. eCollection 2021 Jun.
Introduction Discrimination in the workplace remains a barrier to advancing diversity and inclusion in the physician workforce. This study sought to examine experiences of discrimination, microaggressions, and perceptions of the institution's response in an academic obstetrics and gynecology department. Method All obstetrics and gynecology faculty, fellows, and residents were invited to complete an anonymous, Institutional Review Board-approved cross-sectional survey from February through June 2019. The survey incorporated questions from multiple validated tools on discrimination, microaggressions, perceptions of the institution's response, and opportunities for comments. Data are presented as the frequency with percent and were analyzed using Stata (StataCorp, College Station, USA); two of the authors reviewed and deductively coded the qualitative data. Results The response rate was 58% (87/151), with 30% of the respondents identifying as trainees and 75% identifying as female. Thirty respondents (35%) identified as non-Caucasian. Fifty-four respondents (62%) had ever experienced discrimination and 63 (72%) reported ever experiencing microaggressions at work; of those, 14 (22%) experienced microaggressions several times per week. Of the 69 respondents (79%) who experienced microaggressions and/or discrimination, 49 (71%) felt their experiences were due to gender, and 26 (38%) felt that they were due to race/ancestry. Only 41 respondents (59%) felt that the institution was fair to all employees, and 17 (25%) did not believe diversity was managed effectively. Conclusion Most physicians in the department experienced microaggressions or discrimination, with gender or race/ancestry as common inciting factors. A small but notable portion of respondents would prefer the institution to manage diversity differently. These findings merit further investigation about how to address discrimination in academic medicine.
引言 职场歧视仍然是阻碍医师队伍实现多元化和包容性发展的障碍。本研究旨在调查一所学术性妇产科部门中歧视、微侵犯行为的经历以及对机构应对措施的看法。
方法 2019年2月至6月,邀请所有妇产科教职员工、研究员和住院医师完成一项经机构审查委员会批准的匿名横断面调查。该调查纳入了多个经过验证的工具中的问题,涉及歧视、微侵犯行为、对机构应对措施的看法以及评论机会。数据以百分比频率呈现,并使用Stata(美国德克萨斯州大学站市StataCorp公司)进行分析;两位作者对定性数据进行了审查和演绎编码。
结果 回复率为58%(87/151),30%的受访者为实习生,75%的受访者为女性。30名受访者(35%)为非白种人。54名受访者(62%)曾经历过歧视,63名(72%)报告曾在工作中经历微侵犯行为;其中,14名(22%)每周经历数次微侵犯行为。在经历过微侵犯行为和/或歧视的69名受访者(79%)中,49名(71%)认为他们的经历是由于性别,26名(38%)认为是由于种族/血统。只有41名受访者(59%)认为该机构对所有员工公平,17名(25%)不相信多元化得到了有效管理。
结论 该部门的大多数医生都经历过微侵犯行为或歧视,性别或种族/血统是常见的诱因。一小部分但值得注意的受访者希望该机构以不同方式管理多元化。这些发现值得进一步研究如何解决学术医学中的歧视问题。