Suppr超能文献

颌面模型有限元分析的3D打印实验验证

3D Printing Experimental Validation of the Finite Element Analysis of the Maxillofacial Model.

作者信息

Shu Jingheng, Luo Haotian, Zhang Yuanli, Liu Zhan

机构信息

Key Lab for Biomechanical Engineering of Sichuan Province, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Yibin Institute of Industrial Technology, Sichuan University Yibin Park, Yibin, China.

出版信息

Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Jul 15;9:694140. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.694140. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Contacts used in finite element (FE) models were considered as the best simulation for interactions in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). However, the precision of simulations should be validated through experiments. Three-dimensional (3D) printing models with the high geometric and loading similarities of the individuals were used in the validation. This study aimed to validate the FE models of the TMJ using 3D printing models. Five asymptomatic subjects were recruited in this study. 3D models of mandible, disc, and maxilla were reconstructed according to cone-beam CT (CBCT) image data. PLA was chosen for 3D printing models from bottom to top. Five pressure forces corresponding to the central occlusion were applied to the 3D printing models. Ten strain rosettes were distributed on the mandible to record the horizontal and vertical strains. Contact was used in the FE models with the same geometries, material properties, loadings, and boundary conditions as 3D printing models to simulate the interaction of the disc-condyle, disc-temporal bone, and upper-lower dentition. The differences of the simulated and experimental results for each sample were less than 5% (maximum 4.92%) under all five loadings. In conclusion, it was accurate to use contact to simulate the interactions in TMJs and upper-lower dentition.

摘要

有限元(FE)模型中使用的接触被认为是颞下颌关节(TMJ)相互作用的最佳模拟。然而,模拟的精度应通过实验进行验证。验证中使用了具有个体高度几何和载荷相似性的三维(3D)打印模型。本研究旨在使用3D打印模型验证TMJ的FE模型。本研究招募了五名无症状受试者。根据锥形束CT(CBCT)图像数据重建下颌骨、关节盘和上颌骨的3D模型。选择聚乳酸(PLA)从下到上进行3D打印模型。将对应于正中咬合的五个压力施加到3D打印模型上。十个应变片分布在下颌骨上以记录水平和垂直应变。FE模型中使用与3D打印模型相同的几何形状、材料特性、载荷和边界条件进行接触,以模拟关节盘-髁突、关节盘-颞骨和上下牙列的相互作用。在所有五种载荷下,每个样本的模拟结果与实验结果的差异均小于5%(最大为4.92%)。总之,使用接触来模拟TMJ和上下牙列的相互作用是准确的。

相似文献

1
3D Printing Experimental Validation of the Finite Element Analysis of the Maxillofacial Model.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Jul 15;9:694140. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.694140. eCollection 2021.
2
An Improved Finite Element Model of Temporomandibular Joint in Maxillofacial System: Experimental Validation.
Ann Biomed Eng. 2024 Jul;52(7):1908-1917. doi: 10.1007/s10439-022-03124-7. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
5
Effect of sagittal split ramus osteotomy on stress distribution of temporomandibular joints in patients with mandibular prognathism under symmetric occlusions.
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2020 Dec;23(16):1297-1305. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2020.1796984. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
6
Comparative evaluation on three-dimensional finite element models of the temporomandibular joint.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2008;23 Suppl 1:S53-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.12.011. Epub 2008 Feb 20.
10
The Biomechanical Effects of Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy on Temporomandibular Joint.
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2018 Aug;21(11):617-624. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2018.1504034. Epub 2018 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

3
4
Simulation and experimental study on the stability and comfortability of the wheelchair human system under uneven pavement.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Nov 2;11:1279675. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1279675. eCollection 2023.
5
Modelling Influence on Bending Behaviour Simulation of the Poly(Lactic Acid) Structures, 3D Printed.
Polymers (Basel). 2023 Feb 15;15(4):960. doi: 10.3390/polym15040960.
6
An Improved Finite Element Model of Temporomandibular Joint in Maxillofacial System: Experimental Validation.
Ann Biomed Eng. 2024 Jul;52(7):1908-1917. doi: 10.1007/s10439-022-03124-7. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Biomechanical responses of temporomandibular joints during the lateral protrusions: A 3D finite element study.
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020 Oct;195:105671. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2020.105671. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
2
Biomechanical behaviour of temporomandibular joints during opening and closing of the mouth: A 3D finite element analysis.
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng. 2020 Aug;36(8):e3373. doi: 10.1002/cnm.3373. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
3
Patient-specific finite element models of the human mandible: Lack of consensus on current set-ups.
Oral Dis. 2021 Jan;27(1):42-51. doi: 10.1111/odi.13381. Epub 2020 Jul 9.
4
Finite elements analysis of the temporomandibular joint disc in patients with intra-articular disorders.
BMC Oral Health. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01074-x.
5
Fixation Methods for Mandibular Advancement and Their Effects on Temporomandibular Joint: A Finite Element Analysis Study.
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Feb 21;2020:2810763. doi: 10.1155/2020/2810763. eCollection 2020.
6
Biomechanical comparison of temporomandibular joints after orthognathic surgery before and after design optimization.
Med Eng Phys. 2019 Jun;68:11-16. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2019.03.018. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
7
Temporomandibular joint disc displacement with reduction: a review of mechanisms and clinical presentation.
J Appl Oral Sci. 2019 Feb 21;27:e20180433. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0433.
8
Regional and disease-related differences in properties of the equine temporomandibular joint disc.
J Biomech. 2019 Jan 3;82:54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2018.10.017. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
9
Influences of geometrical and mechanical properties of bone tissues in mandible behaviour - experimental and numerical predictions.
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2017 Jul;20(9):1004-1014. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2017.1322072. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
10
Experimental and numerical predictions of Biomet(®) alloplastic implant in a cadaveric mandibular ramus.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 May;44(5):608-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验