Mendame Ehya Regis Ernest, Zhang Hao, Qi Baiwen, Yu Aixi
Department of Orthopedics Trauma and Microsurgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071 Hubei, China.
J Diabetes Res. 2021 Jul 13;2021:9911072. doi: 10.1155/2021/9911072. eCollection 2021.
This study explored the clinical effectiveness of antibiotic-loaded bone cement on primary treatment of diabetic foot infection. This is a randomized controlled study, including thirty-six patients with diabetic foot ulcer complicated by osteomyelitis who had undergone treatment between May 2018 and December 2019. Patients were randomly divided into control group (group A) and study group (group B). Patients in the intervention group received antibiotic-loaded bone cement repair as primary treatment, while patients in the control group received conventional vacuum sealing draining treatment. Clinical endpoints were assessed and compared between the two groups, including wound healing time, wound bacterial conversion, NRS pain score, number of wound dressing changes, and average hospitalization time. All patients were followed up for a period of 12 months after discharge. Results show that compared with the control group, patients in the study group had significant difference in the number of patients for baseline pathogens eradication, short NRS pain score, hospital length of stay and cost, wound surface reduction, healing time, low rate of complications, and infection recurrence. Based on the findings, we conclude that antibiotic-loaded bone cement can be used for treatment of wound in patient with diabetic foot infection. It can help to control wound infections, shorten hospital length of stay, reduce medical cost, and relieve both doctors' and patients' burden. The application of antibiotic-loaded bone cement is suitable for diabetic wound with soft tissue infection or osteomyelitis.
本研究探讨了载抗生素骨水泥在糖尿病足感染初始治疗中的临床疗效。这是一项随机对照研究,纳入了2018年5月至2019年12月期间接受治疗的36例合并骨髓炎的糖尿病足溃疡患者。患者被随机分为对照组(A组)和研究组(B组)。干预组患者接受载抗生素骨水泥修复作为初始治疗,而对照组患者接受传统的封闭式负压引流治疗。评估并比较两组的临床终点,包括伤口愈合时间、伤口细菌转阴情况、NRS疼痛评分、伤口换药次数及平均住院时间。所有患者出院后随访12个月。结果显示,与对照组相比,研究组患者在基线病原体清除患者数量、NRS疼痛评分缩短、住院时间和费用、创面缩小、愈合时间、并发症发生率及感染复发率方面存在显著差异。基于这些发现,我们得出结论,载抗生素骨水泥可用于治疗糖尿病足感染患者的伤口。它有助于控制伤口感染,缩短住院时间,降低医疗费用,并减轻医患双方的负担。载抗生素骨水泥适用于合并软组织感染或骨髓炎的糖尿病伤口。