• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

计算机辅助与非计算机辅助全髋关节置换术翻修风险降低的比较:基于英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家关节登记处特定制造商数据的分析

Reduced Risk of Revision with Computer-Guided Versus Non-Computer-Guided THA: An Analysis of Manufacturer-Specific Data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.

作者信息

Davis Edward T, McKinney Kerren D, Kamali Amir, Kuljaca Selena, Pagkalos Joseph

机构信息

The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JB JS Open Access. 2021 Jul 28;6(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00006. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00006
PMID:34337286
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8318654/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty (THA) is known to improve implantation precision, but clinical data demonstrating an improvement in survivorship and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are lacking. Our aim was to compare the risk of revision, PROMs, and patient satisfaction between cohorts who underwent THA with and without the use of computer guidance.

METHODS

We used the data set and linked PROM data of the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. Our sample included THAs performed for osteoarthritis using cementless acetabular components from a single manufacturer (cementless and hybrid THAs). An additional analysis was performed limiting the sample size to cementless-only THAs. The primary end point was revision (any component) for any reason. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis and an adjusted Cox proportional-hazards model were used.

RESULTS

There were 41,683 non-computer-guided and 871 (2%) computer-guided cases included in our analysis of the cementless and hybrid group. There were 943 revisions in the non-computer-guided group and 7 in the computer-guided group. The cumulative revision rate at 10 years was 3.88% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.59% to 4.18%) for the non-computer-guided group and 1.06% (95% CI: 0.45% to 2.76%) for the computer-guided group. The Cox proportional-hazards model yielded a hazard ratio of 0.45 (95% CI: 0.21 to 0.96; p = 0.038). In the analysis of the cementless-only group, the cumulative revision rate at 10 years was 3.99% (95% CI: 3.62% to 4.38%) and 1.20% (95% CI: 0.52% to 3.12%) for the 2 groups, respectively. The Cox proportional-hazards model yielded a hazard ratio of 0.47 (95% CI: 0.22 to 1.01; p = 0.053). There was no significant difference in the 6-month Oxford Hip Score, the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) and EQ-VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) scores, and patient-reported success rates. Patient satisfaction (single-item satisfaction outcome measure) was higher in the computer-guided group, but this finding was limited by a reduced number of responses.

CONCLUSIONS

In our analysis, the use of computer-guided surgery was associated with a lower rate of revision at mean follow-up of 5.6 years. This finding was upheld when the sample was restricted to cementless-only THAs. Causality cannot be inferred in view of the observational nature of the study, and additional studies are recommended to validate these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

未标注

已知计算机辅助全髋关节置换术(THA)可提高植入精度,但缺乏能证明其可提高生存率及患者报告结局指标(PROMs)的临床数据。我们的目的是比较使用和不使用计算机辅助进行THA的队列之间的翻修风险、PROMs及患者满意度。

方法

我们使用了英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家关节注册中心的数据集及相关的PROM数据。我们的样本包括使用单一制造商的非骨水泥髋臼组件(非骨水泥和混合型THA)治疗骨关节炎的THA。另外进行了一项分析,将样本量限制为仅非骨水泥THA。主要终点是因任何原因进行的翻修(任何组件)。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析和校正的Cox比例风险模型。

结果

在我们对非骨水泥和混合型组的分析中,包括41683例非计算机辅助和871例(2%)计算机辅助病例。非计算机辅助组有943例翻修,计算机辅助组有7例。非计算机辅助组10年的累积翻修率为3.88%(95%置信区间[CI]:3.59%至4.18%),计算机辅助组为1.06%(95%CI:0.45%至2.76%)。Cox比例风险模型得出的风险比为0.45(95%CI:0.21至0.96;p = 0.038)。在仅非骨水泥组的分析中,两组10年的累积翻修率分别为3.99%(95%CI:3.62%至4.38%)和1.20%(95%CI:0.52%至3.12%)。Cox比例风险模型得出的风险比为0.47(95%CI:0.22至1.01;p = 0.053)。6个月的牛津髋关节评分、欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)和EQ视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分以及患者报告的成功率没有显著差异。计算机辅助组的患者满意度(单项满意度结局指标)较高,但这一发现因回复数量减少而受到限制。

结论

在我们的分析中,在平均5.6年的随访中,使用计算机辅助手术与较低的翻修率相关。当样本仅限于仅非骨水泥THA时,这一发现仍然成立。鉴于该研究的观察性本质不能推断因果关系,建议进行更多研究以验证这些发现。

证据水平

治疗性III级。有关证据水平的完整描述,请参阅作者指南。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70cb/8318654/3b201ce1ea16/jbjsoa-6-e21.00006-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70cb/8318654/0749ae4ac1da/jbjsoa-6-e21.00006-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70cb/8318654/3b201ce1ea16/jbjsoa-6-e21.00006-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70cb/8318654/0749ae4ac1da/jbjsoa-6-e21.00006-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/70cb/8318654/3b201ce1ea16/jbjsoa-6-e21.00006-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Reduced Risk of Revision with Computer-Guided Versus Non-Computer-Guided THA: An Analysis of Manufacturer-Specific Data from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.计算机辅助与非计算机辅助全髋关节置换术翻修风险降低的比较:基于英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家关节登记处特定制造商数据的分析
JB JS Open Access. 2021 Jul 28;6(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.21.00006. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
2
Effect of Bearing Surface on Survival of Cementless and Hybrid Total Hip Arthroplasty: Study of Data in the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.关节面材料对非骨水泥型及混合型全髋关节置换术假体生存率的影响:基于英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰及马恩岛国家关节注册中心的数据研究
JB JS Open Access. 2020 May 15;5(2):e0075. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00075. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.
3
Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?使用骨水泥型和非骨水泥型股骨假体进行初次全髋关节置换翻修术后的翻修率是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Nov;473(11):3391-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4245-6.
4
The Effect of Surgeon Caseload on the Relative Revision Rate of Cemented and Cementless Unicompartmental Knee Replacements: An Analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.外科医生手术量对水泥固定和非水泥固定单髁膝关节置换术后相对翻修率的影响:来自英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家联合登记处的分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Apr 15;102(8):644-653. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.01060.
5
The Effect of Surgical Approach on Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed for Displaced Intracapsular Hip Fractures: An Analysis from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.手术入路对英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家关节登记处行骨水泥型全髋关节置换术治疗移位型囊内髋关节骨折患者结局的影响:一项分析
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Jan 2;102(1):21-28. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00195.
6
Is Cemented or Cementless Femoral Stem Fixation More Durable in Patients Older Than 75 Years of Age? A Comparison of the Best-performing Stems.75 岁以上患者中,骨水泥型或非骨水泥型股骨柄固定哪个更耐用?最佳表现的柄的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jul;476(7):1428-1437. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000533621.57561.a4.
7
Trabecular Metal Versus Non-Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components and the Risk of Re-Revision Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.网眼金属与非网眼金属髋臼部件在翻修全髋关节置换术后再次翻修风险方面的比较:来自英国国家关节注册处的一项倾向评分匹配研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Jul 5;100(13):1132-1140. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.00718.
8
Outcomes of different bearings in total hip arthroplasty - implant survival, revision causes, and patient-reported outcome.全髋关节置换术中不同轴承的结果——植入物存活率、翻修原因及患者报告的结果。
Dan Med J. 2017 Mar;64(3).
9
Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components Reduce the Risk of Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matched Study From the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.经全国英格兰和威尔士关节注册中心的倾向评分匹配研究发现,使用小梁金属髋臼组件可降低初次全髋关节置换术后翻修的风险。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Feb;33(2):447-452. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.08.036. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
10
The Association of Body Mass Index with Risk of Long-Term Revision and 90-Day Mortality Following Primary Total Hip Replacement: Findings from the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.体重指数与初次全髋关节置换术后长期翻修风险和 90 天死亡率的关系:来自英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家联合登记处的研究结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Dec 19;100(24):2140-2152. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00120.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Alternative Registration Planes in Imageless, Computer-Assisted Navigation Systems for Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.评估无影像、计算机辅助导航系统中直接前侧全髋关节置换术的替代注册平面。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Nov 4;24(21):7092. doi: 10.3390/s24217092.
2
Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty for Traumatic Acetabular Fracture Using an Image-free Second-Generation System.使用无图像第二代系统的机器人辅助全髋关节置换术治疗创伤性髋臼骨折
Arthroplast Today. 2024 Oct 18;30:101485. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101485. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Comparison between accuracy of augmented reality computed tomography-based and portable augmented reality-based navigation systems for cup insertion in total hip arthroplasty.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Bearing Surface on Survival of Cementless and Hybrid Total Hip Arthroplasty: Study of Data in the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man.关节面材料对非骨水泥型及混合型全髋关节置换术假体生存率的影响:基于英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰及马恩岛国家关节注册中心的数据研究
JB JS Open Access. 2020 May 15;5(2):e0075. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00075. eCollection 2020 Apr-Jun.
2
Computerized navigation for total hip arthroplasty is associated with lower complications and ninety-day readmissions: a nationwide linked analysis.计算机导航全髋关节置换术与较低的并发症和 90 天再入院率相关:一项全国性的关联分析。
Int Orthop. 2020 Mar;44(3):471-476. doi: 10.1007/s00264-019-04475-y. Epub 2020 Jan 9.
3
基于增强现实 CT 和便携式增强现实导航系统在全髋关节置换术中杯插入准确性的比较。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 9;14(1):8332. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59115-2.
4
Changes in leg length and hip offset in navigated imageless vs. conventional total hip arthroplasty.导航下无影像与传统全髋关节置换术中腿长和髋臼偏移的变化。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 11;13(1):17161. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44009-6.
5
Accuracy of augmented reality with computed tomography-based navigation in total hip arthroplasty.基于 CT 导航的增强现实技术在全髋关节置换术中的准确性。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Sep 6;18(1):662. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04155-z.
Can some early revision total hip arthroplasties be avoided?
能否避免一些早期的全髋关节翻修术?
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jun;101-B(6_Supple_B):97-103. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-1448.R1.
4
From Bench to Bedside: Robotics and Navigation in Orthopaedics-Rise of the Machines or Just Rising Costs?从实验室到临床:骨科中的机器人技术与导航——机器的崛起还是成本的攀升?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Apr;477(4):692-694. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000668.
5
Computer-Assisted Navigation Is Associated with Reductions in the Rates of Dislocation and Acetabular Component Revision Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.计算机辅助导航可降低初次全髋关节置换术后脱位和髋臼部件翻修的发生率。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Feb 6;101(3):250-256. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00108.
6
Assuring the long-term total joint arthroplasty: a triad of variables.确保长期全关节置换术:三变量。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Jan;101-B(1_Supple_A):11-18. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B1.BJJ-2018-0377.R1.
7
Robotic Technology in Orthopaedic Surgery.骨科手术中的机器人技术。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Nov 21;100(22):1984-1992. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01397.
8
Intraoperative placement of total hip arthroplasty components with robotic-arm assisted technology correlates with postoperative implant position: a CT-based study.机器人辅助技术在全髋关节置换术中的应用与术后假体位置相关:一项基于 CT 的研究。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Oct;100-B(10):1303-1309. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B10-BJJ-2018-0201.R1.
9
Fourteen Year Follow-Up of Randomized Clinical Trials of Active Robotic-Assisted Total Hip Arthroplasty.主动机器人辅助全髋关节置换术随机临床试验的 14 年随访结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Mar;33(3):810-814. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.066. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
10
Patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty registries Report of the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Working Group of the International Society of Arthroplasty Registries Part II. Recommendations for selection, administration, and analysis.关节置换登记中的患者报告结局测量 国际关节置换登记协会患者报告结局测量工作组报告 第二部分。选择、实施和分析的建议
Acta Orthop. 2016 Jul;87 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):9-23. doi: 10.1080/17453674.2016.1181816. Epub 2016 May 26.