• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

务实的患者参与设计务实的肿瘤学临床试验。

Pragmatic patient engagement in designing pragmatic oncology clinical trials.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research, University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

The PATIENTS Program, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA.

出版信息

Future Oncol. 2021 Oct;17(28):3691-3704. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-0556. Epub 2021 Aug 2.

DOI:10.2217/fon-2021-0556
PMID:34337970
Abstract

Oncology trials are the cornerstone of effective and safe therapeutic discoveries. However, there is increasing demand for pragmatism and patient engagement in the design, implementation and dissemination of oncology trials. Many researchers are uncertain about making trials more practical and even less knowledgeable about how to meaningfully engage patients without compromising scientific rigor to meet regulatory requirements. The present work provides practical guidance for addressing both pragmaticism and meaningful patient engagement. Applying evidence-based approaches like PRECIS-2-tool and the 10-Step Engagement Framework offer practical guidance to make future trials in oncology truly pragmatic and patient-centered. Consequently, such patient-centered trials have improved participation, faster recruitment and greater retention, and uptake of innovative technologies in community-based care.

摘要

肿瘤学试验是有效和安全治疗发现的基石。然而,在肿瘤学试验的设计、实施和传播中,越来越需要务实和患者参与。许多研究人员不确定如何使试验更具实用性,甚至更不清楚如何在不影响科学严谨性以满足监管要求的情况下,有意义地让患者参与进来。本工作为解决务实性和有意义的患者参与问题提供了实用指导。应用基于证据的方法,如 PRECIS-2 工具和 10 步参与框架,为未来的肿瘤学试验提供了实用指导,使其真正具有务实性和以患者为中心。因此,这种以患者为中心的试验提高了参与度、加快了招募速度和提高了保留率,并在社区护理中采用了创新技术。

相似文献

1
Pragmatic patient engagement in designing pragmatic oncology clinical trials.务实的患者参与设计务实的肿瘤学临床试验。
Future Oncol. 2021 Oct;17(28):3691-3704. doi: 10.2217/fon-2021-0556. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
2
A protocol for stakeholder engagement in head and neck cancer pragmatic trials.头颈部癌症实用临床试验中利益相关者参与的方案。
BMC Cancer. 2024 Sep 5;24(1):1109. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12733-5.
3
Patient-reported outcomes and target effect sizes in pragmatic randomized trials in ClinicalTrials.gov: A cross-sectional analysis.ClinicalTrials.gov 中实用随机试验中的患者报告结局和目标效应量:一项横断面分析。
PLoS Med. 2022 Feb 8;19(2):e1003896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003896. eCollection 2022 Feb.
4
The role of pragmatism in explaining heterogeneity in meta-analyses of randomised trials: a protocol for a cross-sectional methodological review.实用主义在解释随机试验荟萃分析中异质性的作用:一项横断面方法学综述的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 3;7(9):e017887. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017887.
5
Pragmatic study designs for older adults with cancer: Report from the U13 conference.老年癌症患者实用研究设计:U13 会议报告。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2016 Jul;7(4):234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
6
Pragmatic trials revisited: applicability is about individualization.再探实用试验:适用性关乎个体化。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2018 Jul;99:164-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
7
Developing a framework for the ethical design and conduct of pragmatic trials in healthcare: a mixed methods research protocol.制定医疗保健中实用临床试验的伦理设计和实施框架:混合方法研究方案。
Trials. 2018 Sep 27;19(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2895-x.
8
Pragmaticism in Cancer Clinical Trials.癌症临床试验中的实用主义。
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2024 Jun;44(3):e100040. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_100040.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
What's Important: Patient Engagement in Research.重要内容:患者参与研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Oct 21;102(20):1836-1838. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00625.

引用本文的文献

1
A Proposal for Addressing Bioethical Concerns Along the 10-Step Framework for Community Engagement.关于在社区参与的十步框架中解决生物伦理问题的提案。
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70345. doi: 10.1111/hex.70345.
2
Patient Involvement in the Design of an Innovative Clinical Study to Compare the Palatability of Anti-Hyperkalemia Medications.患者参与一项创新性临床研究的设计,该研究旨在比较抗高钾血症药物的适口性。
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 May 31;18:1059-1064. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S445399. eCollection 2024.
3
Patient engagement in designing, conducting, and disseminating clinical pain research: IMMPACT recommended considerations.
患者参与临床疼痛研究的设计、实施和传播:IMMPACT推荐的考量因素。
Pain. 2024 May 1;165(5):1013-1028. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003121. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
4
BIPOC experiences of (anti-)racist patient engagement in adolescent and young adult oncology research: an electronic Delphi study.BIPOC 在青少年和青年肿瘤学研究中(反)种族主义患者参与的体验:一项电子德尔菲研究。
Future Oncol. 2024 Mar;20(9):547-561. doi: 10.2217/fon-2023-0771. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
5
Research Buddy partnership in a MD-PhD program: lessons learned.医学博士-哲学博士项目中的研究伙伴关系:经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Feb 18;9(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00414-9.
6
Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient-oriented research.实用主义作为一种面向患者的研究范式。
Health Expect. 2022 Feb;25(1):38-47. doi: 10.1111/hex.13384. Epub 2021 Nov 8.