Heller L I, Silver K H, Villegas B J, Balcom S J, Weiner B H
Coronary Blood Flow Research Laboratory, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester 01655.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Oct;24(4):1012-7. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90863-x.
This study attempted 1) to assess the utility of rest measurements of intracoronary blood flow velocity for the physiologic assessment of coronary stenoses before and after right coronary artery angioplasty, and 2) to compare the phasic flow pattern in the right coronary artery proper with the phasic flow pattern in its major branches to the left ventricle.
Previous investigations have demonstrated that a reduction in distal blood flow velocity and a loss of distal diastolic predominant flow are characteristic of physiologically significant stenoses and that these indexes normalize after successful coronary artery dilation. However, these studies were predominantly performed in the left coronary artery. The utility of monitoring rest velocity variables during angioplasty of the right coronary artery has not been studied.
We studied 20 patients undergoing angioplasty of the right coronary artery with use of a Doppler angioplasty guide wire.
Values were expressed as the mean value +/- 1 SD. The rest average peak velocity did not decrease distal to angiographically significant right coronary artery stenoses (23.3 +/- 9.4 cm/s proximal vs. 20.2 +/- 11.1 cm/s distal, p = 0.20). The proximal/distal velocity ratio was 1.4 +/- 0.9 before angioplasty and did not significantly decrease after angioplasty (p = 0.58). This study had a 99.4% power to detect a difference between proximal and distal average peak velocity. There was no relation between percent diameter stenosis and proximal/distal velocity ratios (r = 0.15, p = 0.55). Diastolic predominant flow was not observed in the proximal or distal right coronary artery. However, after angioplasty, diastolic predominant flow was observed in the posterolateral and posterior descending coronary arteries.
Rest phasic Doppler flow velocity indexes are not useful for evaluating stenoses in the right coronary artery proper before or after angioplasty. In contrast to the right coronary artery proper, diastolic predominant flow is observed in the posterior descending and posterolateral coronary arteries. The utility of measuring hyperemic Doppler flow velocity indexes, such as distal coronary flow reserve, for assessing right coronary artery stenoses merits further investigation.
本研究旨在1)评估冠状动脉造影术前后右冠状动脉内血流速度静息测量值对冠状动脉狭窄进行生理学评估的效用,以及2)比较右冠状动脉主干与左心室主要分支的血流相位模式。
先前的研究表明,生理上显著的狭窄的特征是远端血流速度降低和舒张期血流优势丧失,并且这些指标在冠状动脉成功扩张后恢复正常。然而,这些研究主要在左冠状动脉中进行。右冠状动脉血管成形术期间监测静息速度变量的效用尚未得到研究。
我们使用多普勒血管成形术导丝研究了20例接受右冠状动脉血管成形术的患者。
数值表示为平均值±1标准差。在血管造影显示有显著狭窄的右冠状动脉远端,静息平均峰值速度并未降低(近端为23.3±9.4 cm/s,远端为20.2±11.1 cm/s,p = 0.20)。血管成形术前近端/远端速度比为1.4±0.9,血管成形术后没有显著降低(p = 0.58)。本研究有99.4%的把握度检测近端和远端平均峰值速度之间的差异。直径狭窄百分比与近端/远端速度比之间没有关系(r = 0.15,p = 0.55)。在右冠状动脉近端或远端均未观察到舒张期血流优势。然而,血管成形术后,在后外侧和后降支冠状动脉中观察到舒张期血流优势。
静息相位多普勒血流速度指标对评估血管成形术前后右冠状动脉主干的狭窄无用。与右冠状动脉主干不同,在后降支和后外侧冠状动脉中观察到舒张期血流优势。测量充血状态下的多普勒血流速度指标(如冠状动脉远端血流储备)用于评估右冠状动脉狭窄的效用值得进一步研究。