Michaud P A
Service de la santé publique et de la planification sanitaire, Lausanne.
Soz Praventivmed. 1987;32(6):280-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02078161.
Since 1983 apprentices and students 16-19 years of the Canton of Vaud (Switzerland) have been offered various activities in the frame of a school-based health promotion program called "Jeunesse et Santé" (screening, health education...). This paper focuses on the description and the evaluation of emergency care and counseling activities ran by nurses in each school. During one and a half year, 969 adolescents have presented themselves for medical reasons (40%), or for problems of psychosomatic (30%) or psycho-social (30%) nature. Most of the pupils have consulted either spontaneously (40%) or after a screening procedure (40%). 297 youngsters have been sent to another institution for further evaluation and treatment (personal physician, outpatient clinic, social services). Three months after the first consultation, the nurses have contacted both the adolescents an the institutions for an evaluation: A large part of the pupils is satisfied with the help they have received (greater than 90%). However the follow-up seems more difficult to organize and less effective for the adolescents that have presented themselves with psychosocial problems. The paper ends with the advantages and the limitations of ambulatory research performed in the frame of school health activities.
自1983年以来,瑞士沃州16至19岁的学徒和学生在一项名为“青年与健康”的校本健康促进计划框架内参与了各种活动(筛查、健康教育等)。本文重点描述和评估了各学校护士开展的急救与咨询活动。在一年半的时间里,969名青少年因医疗原因(40%)、心身问题(30%)或心理社会问题(30%)前来咨询。大多数学生是自发前来咨询(40%)或在经过筛查程序后来咨询(40%)。297名青少年被转至其他机构进行进一步评估和治疗(私人医生、门诊诊所、社会服务机构)。首次咨询三个月后,护士们与青少年及相关机构联系以进行评估:大部分学生对所获得的帮助感到满意(超过90%)。然而,对于那些因心理社会问题前来咨询的青少年,后续跟进似乎更难组织且效果欠佳。本文最后阐述了在学校健康活动框架内开展门诊研究的优点和局限性。