• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对左心室辅助装置患者自我管理干预的初步临床试验。

A pilot clinical trial of a self-management intervention in patients with a left ventricular assist device.

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.

New York-Presbyterian Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Artif Organs. 2022 Jun;25(2):91-104. doi: 10.1007/s10047-021-01289-x. Epub 2021 Aug 3.

DOI:10.1007/s10047-021-01289-x
PMID:34342807
Abstract

Self-management is a health behavior known to predict treatment outcomes in patients with multiple co-morbidities and/or chronic conditions. However, the self-management process and outcomes in the left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) population are understudied. This pilot randomized control trial (RCT) evaluated the feasibility of a novel "smartphone app-directed and nurse-supported self-management intervention" in patients implanted with durable LVADs. Assessments included behavioral (self-efficacy and adherence), clinical (complications), and healthcare utilization (unplanned clinic, emergency room (ER) visits, and re-hospitalization) outcomes, completed at baseline (pre-hospital discharge) and months 1, 3, and 6 post-hospital discharge. Intervention patients (n = 14) had favorable patterns/trends of results across study outcomes than control patients (n = 16). Notably, intervention patients had much lower complications and healthcare utilization rates than controls. For example, intervention patients had 2 (14.3%) driveline infections in 6 months while control patients had 3 (19.0%). Additionally, at month 3, intervention patients had 0% ER visits versus 36% of control patients. At month 6, the mean cumulative number of re-hospitalizations for the control group was higher (0.9 ± 0.93) than intervention (0.3 ± 0.61) group. Despite the small sample size and limitations of feasibility/pilot studies, our outcomes data appeared to favor the novel intervention. Lessons learned from this study suggest the intervention should be implemented for 6 months post-hospital discharge. Further research is needed including large and rigorous multi-center RCTs to generate knowledge explaining the mechanism of the effect of self-management on LVAD treatment outcomes.

摘要

自我管理是一种健康行为,已知可预测患有多种合并症和/或慢性病患者的治疗结果。然而,左心室辅助装置(LVAD)人群的自我管理过程和结果研究不足。这项试点随机对照试验(RCT)评估了一种新型“智能手机应用指导和护士支持的自我管理干预”在植入耐用性 LVAD 的患者中的可行性。评估包括行为(自我效能和依从性)、临床(并发症)和医疗保健利用(计划外就诊、急诊室(ER)就诊和再入院)结果,在基线(住院前出院)和出院后 1、3 和 6 个月完成。干预组(n=14)的研究结果比对照组(n=16)有更有利的结果模式/趋势。值得注意的是,干预组的并发症和医疗保健利用率明显低于对照组。例如,干预组在 6 个月内有 2 例(14.3%)的驱动线感染,而对照组有 3 例(19.0%)。此外,在第 3 个月,干预组无 ER 就诊,而对照组有 36%的患者就诊。在第 6 个月,对照组的平均累积再住院次数较高(0.9±0.93),而干预组较低(0.3±0.61)。尽管样本量较小且可行性/试点研究存在局限性,但我们的结果数据似乎有利于新型干预措施。从这项研究中吸取的经验表明,该干预措施应在出院后 6 个月实施。需要进一步开展包括大型严格的多中心 RCT 在内的研究,以产生关于自我管理对 LVAD 治疗结果影响的机制的知识。

相似文献

1
A pilot clinical trial of a self-management intervention in patients with a left ventricular assist device.一项针对左心室辅助装置患者自我管理干预的初步临床试验。
J Artif Organs. 2022 Jun;25(2):91-104. doi: 10.1007/s10047-021-01289-x. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
2
Patient-Reported Issues Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Hospitalization.患者在植入左心室辅助装置住院后的报告问题。
ASAIO J. 2021 Jun 1;67(6):658-665. doi: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001381.
3
Significance of Residual Mitral Regurgitation After Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.连续血流左心室辅助装置植入术后残余二尖瓣反流的意义。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Feb;5(2):81-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
4
Better With Time: An Economic Assessment of Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support in a Population Surviving at Least 1 Year with a Left Ventricular Assist Device.随着时间的推移而改善:在至少使用左心室辅助装置生存 1 年的人群中进行长期机械循环支持的经济评估。
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;32(4):738-746. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2018.09.029. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
5
Left ventricular assist devices: an evidence-based analysis.左心室辅助装置:基于证据的分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2004;4(3):1-69. Epub 2004 Mar 1.
6
Understanding Left Ventricular Assist Devices.了解左心室辅助设备。
Blood Purif. 2018;46(4):292-300. doi: 10.1159/000491872. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
7
Outcomes after implantation of partial-support left ventricular assist devices in inotropic-dependent patients: Do we still need full-support assist devices?在依赖血管活性药物的患者中植入部分支持左心室辅助装置后的结果:我们仍然需要全支持辅助装置吗?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Sep;148(3):1115-21; discussion 1021-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.05.063. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
8
Risk Assessment and Comparative Effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Device and Medical Management in Ambulatory Heart Failure Patients: The ROADMAP Study 2-Year Results.在门诊心力衰竭患者中左心室辅助装置和药物治疗的风险评估和比较效果:ROADMAP 研究 2 年结果。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Jul;5(7):518-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2017.02.016. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
9
Infectious complications in patients with left ventricular assist device: etiology and outcomes in the continuous-flow era.左心室辅助装置患者的感染性并发症:连续流时代的病因和结局。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Oct;90(4):1270-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.093.
10
Present-Day Hospital Readmissions after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Large Single-Center Study.左心室辅助装置植入术后的当代医院再入院情况:一项大型单中心研究。
Tex Heart Inst J. 2015 Oct 1;42(5):419-29. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-14-4971. eCollection 2015 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Electronic Health Record Interventions to Reduce Risk of Hospital Readmissions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.电子健康记录干预措施以降低医院再入院风险:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2521785. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.21785.
2
Medication-focused telehealth interventions to reduce the hospital readmission rate: a systematic review.以药物治疗为重点的远程医疗干预措施以降低医院再入院率:一项系统评价。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Feb 5;18(1):2457411. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2025.2457411. eCollection 2025.
3
Validity and reliability of the self-care behaviour scale for patients with left ventricular assist device.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-care and chronic disease.自我护理与慢性病。
Nurs Res Pract. 2013;2013:827409. doi: 10.1155/2013/827409. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
左心室辅助装置患者自我护理行为量表的有效性和可靠性。
Nurs Open. 2024 Mar;11(3):e2102. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2102.
4
Daptomycin Pharmacokinetics in Blood and Wound Fluid in Critical Ill Patients with Left Ventricle Assist Devices.左心室辅助装置重症患者血液和伤口引流液中达托霉素的药代动力学
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 May 13;12(5):904. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12050904.