• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左心室辅助装置患者自我护理行为量表的有效性和可靠性。

Validity and reliability of the self-care behaviour scale for patients with left ventricular assist device.

机构信息

College of Nursing, Dankook University, Cheonan, South Korea.

College of Nursing, Dongguk University, Gyeongju, South Korea.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2024 Mar;11(3):e2102. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2102.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.2102
PMID:38530867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10965044/
Abstract

AIMS

To evaluate the validity and reliability of the self-care behaviour scale for patients with left ventricular assist devices.

DESIGN

Methodological study.

METHODS

The English version of the scale was translated into Korean, and it was then back-translated into English. Survey data were collected from 32 patients with left ventricular assist device in South Korea, and construct validity, content validity and reliability were analysed.

RESULTS

The original self-care behaviour scale comprises three domains and 33 items, whereas the Korean self-care behaviour scale comprises 27 items and five domains: device management, wound management, symptom monitoring, activated healthcare system and self-care management. Cronbach's alpha for the overall scale was 0.94, and that for the five domains ranged from 0.36 to 0.90. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the overall scale was 0.89, and the five domains ranged from 0.71 to 0.88.

CONCLUSION

The newly evaluated scale would be valid and reliable in measure self-care behaviour for patients with a left ventricular assist device.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Patients can manage the left ventricular assist device on their own based on evidence and use it as a tool for effective communication with medical professionals.

摘要

目的

评估左心室辅助装置患者自我护理行为量表的效度和信度。

设计

方法学研究。

方法

量表的英文版本被翻译成韩语,然后再被回译为英文。在韩国,从 32 名左心室辅助装置患者中收集了调查数据,并对结构效度、内容效度和信度进行了分析。

结果

原始的自我护理行为量表包括三个领域和 33 个项目,而韩国的自我护理行为量表包括 27 个项目和五个领域:装置管理、伤口管理、症状监测、激活医疗保健系统和自我护理管理。总体量表的克朗巴赫系数为 0.94,五个领域的克朗巴赫系数范围为 0.36 至 0.90。总体量表的组内相关系数为 0.89,五个领域的组内相关系数范围为 0.71 至 0.88。

结论

新评估的量表在测量左心室辅助装置患者的自我护理行为方面具有有效性和可靠性。

专业意义和/或患者护理意义:患者可以根据证据自行管理左心室辅助装置,并将其用作与医疗专业人员进行有效沟通的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7612/10965044/d4c712ae16be/NOP2-11-e2102-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7612/10965044/334b044bfe2c/NOP2-11-e2102-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7612/10965044/d4c712ae16be/NOP2-11-e2102-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7612/10965044/334b044bfe2c/NOP2-11-e2102-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7612/10965044/d4c712ae16be/NOP2-11-e2102-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of the self-care behaviour scale for patients with left ventricular assist device.左心室辅助装置患者自我护理行为量表的有效性和可靠性。
Nurs Open. 2024 Mar;11(3):e2102. doi: 10.1002/nop2.2102.
2
Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale.左心室辅助装置自我护理行为量表的有效性和可靠性。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 10;18(2):e0275465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275465. eCollection 2023.
3
[Validity and Reliability of Korean Version of Self-Care Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Inventory (SC-COPD) and Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale (SCES-COPD)].《慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我护理量表韩语版(SC-COPD)及自我护理自我效能量表(SCES-COPD)的效度与信度》
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2022 Oct;52(5):522-534. doi: 10.4040/jkan.22062.
4
Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of the HIV Self-Management Scale in Patients with HIV.HIV感染者中韩文版HIV自我管理量表的心理测量学特性
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2015 Jun;45(3):439-48. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2015.45.3.439.
5
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Revised Self-Care of Heart Failure Index v7.2.《心力衰竭自我护理评估量表 v7.2 韩文版的有效性和可靠性》。
Clin Nurs Res. 2022 Sep;31(7):1296-1307. doi: 10.1177/10547738221106590. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
6
Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory (SCODI-K).《糖尿病自我护理量表(SCODI-K)韩文版的有效性和可靠性》。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 19;18(22):12179. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182212179.
7
[Psychometric Properties of the Korean Version of Self-Efficacy for HIV Disease Management Skills].[《韩国版艾滋病疾病管理技能自我效能感量表的心理测量学特性》]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2023 Jun;53(3):295-308. doi: 10.4040/jkan.23016.
8
Validation of the Korean Version of the Assessment of Strategies in Families-Effectiveness Scale.《家庭策略有效性评估量表(韩文版)》的验证。
J Nurs Res. 2023 Oct 1;31(5):e290. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000569.
9
Evaluation of the psychometric properties of self-efficacy and adherence scales for caregivers of patients with a left ventricular assist device.左心室辅助装置患者照顾者自我效能感和依从性量表的心理测量学特性评估
Prog Transplant. 2015 Jun;25(2):116-23. doi: 10.7182/pit2015556.
10
Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Palliative Care Nursing Self-Competence scale for infant use.婴儿使用的韩文版姑息护理护理自我效能感量表的心理测量学特性。
Aust Crit Care. 2023 Nov;36(6):1019-1024. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2022.12.010. Epub 2023 Feb 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of Hypertension in Patients With Ventricular Assist Devices: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.血管辅助设备患者的高血压管理:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circ Heart Fail. 2022 May;15(5):e000074. doi: 10.1161/HHF.0000000000000074. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
2
Guidance on the management of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) supported patients for the non-LVAD specialist healthcare provider: executive summary.非左心室辅助装置(LVAD)专科医疗服务提供者对LVAD支持患者的管理指南:执行摘要。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2021 Oct;23(10):1597-1609. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2327. Epub 2021 Aug 22.
3
A pilot clinical trial of a self-management intervention in patients with a left ventricular assist device.
一项针对左心室辅助装置患者自我管理干预的初步临床试验。
J Artif Organs. 2022 Jun;25(2):91-104. doi: 10.1007/s10047-021-01289-x. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
4
Factors influencing health-related quality of life of patients with a left ventricular assist device: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.影响左心室辅助装置患者健康相关生活质量的因素:一项系统评价与主题综合分析
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021 Nov 28;20(8):803-815. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab056.
5
What is the optimal therapeutic protocol for using a durable left ventricular assist device in the near future of a developing country?在一个发展中国家的近期,使用耐用型左心室辅助装置的最佳治疗方案是什么?
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Apr;13(4):2567-2568. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-338.
6
Self-management for patients on ventricular assist device support: a national, multicentre study: protocol for a 3-phase study.心室辅助装置支持下的患者自我管理:一项全国性多中心研究:一项 3 期研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 5;11(5):e044374. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044374.
7
Effects of a smartphone-based self-care health diary for heart transplant recipients: A mixed methods study.基于智能手机的心脏移植受者自我保健健康日记的效果:一项混合方法研究。
Appl Nurs Res. 2021 Apr;58:151408. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2021.151408. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
8
Self-management with the therapeutic regimen in patients with ventricular assist device (VAD) support - a scoping review.心脏辅助装置(VAD)支持患者的治疗方案自我管理 - 范围综述。
Heart Lung. 2021 May-Jun;50(3):388-396. doi: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2021.01.019. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
9
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.心脏病与中风统计-2021 更新:美国心脏协会报告。
Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8):e254-e743. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
10
Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With a Left Ventricular Assist Device (QOLVAD) Questionnaire: Initial Psychometrics of a New Instrument.健康相关生活质量在左心室辅助装置(QOLVAD)患者问卷:新仪器的初步心理测量学评估。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021;36(2):172-184. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000774.