Suppr超能文献

使用排名前44位护理学院的四年推文对对讲机和扩音器主题标签进行比较:主题分析

Comparison of Intercom and Megaphone Hashtags Using Four Years of Tweets From the Top 44 Schools of Nursing: Thematic Analysis.

作者信息

Acquaviva Kimberly

机构信息

School of Nursing University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA United States.

出版信息

JMIR Nurs. 2021 Apr 20;4(2):e25114. doi: 10.2196/25114. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

When this study began in 2018, I sought to determine the extent to which the top 50 schools of nursing were using hashtags that could attract attention from journalists on Twitter. In December 2020, the timeframe was expanded to encompass 2 more years of data, and an analysis was conducted of the types of hashtags used.

OBJECTIVE

The study attempted to answer the following question: to what extent are top-ranked schools of nursing using hashtags that could attract attention from journalists, policy makers, and the public on Twitter?

METHODS

In February 2018, 47 of the top 50 schools of nursing had public Twitter accounts. The most recent 3200 tweets were extracted from each account and analyzed. There were 31,762 tweets in the time period covered (September 29, 2016, through February 22, 2018). After 13,429 retweets were excluded, 18,333 tweets remained. In December 2020, 44 of the original 47 schools of nursing still had public Twitter accounts under the same name used in the first phase of the study. Three accounts that were no longer active were removed from the 2016-2018 data set, resulting in 16,939 tweets from 44 schools of nursing. The Twitter data for the 44 schools of nursing were obtained for the time period covered in the second phase of the study (February 23, 2018, through December 13, 2020), and the most recent 3200 tweets were extracted from each of the accounts. On excluding retweets, there were 40,368 tweets in the 2018-2020 data set. The 2016-2018 data set containing 16,939 tweets was merged with the 2018-2020 data set containing 40,368 tweets, resulting in 57,307 tweets in the 2016-2020 data set.

RESULTS

Each hashtag used 100 times or more in the 2016-2020 data set was categorized as one of the following seven types: nursing, school, conference or tweet chat, health, illness/disease/condition, population, and something else. These types were then broken down into the following two categories: intercom hashtags and megaphone hashtags. Approximately 83% of the time, schools of nursing used intercom hashtags (inward-facing hashtags focused on in-group discussion within and about the profession). Schools of nursing rarely used outward-facing megaphone hashtags. There was no discernible shift in the way that schools of nursing used hashtags after the publication of .

CONCLUSIONS

Top schools of nursing use hashtags more like intercoms to communicate with other nurses rather than megaphones to invite attention from journalists, policy makers, and the public. If schools of nursing want the media to showcase their faculty members as experts, they need to increase their use of megaphone hashtags to connect the work of their faculty with topics of interest to the public.

摘要

背景

2018年本研究开始时,我试图确定排名前50的护理学院在推特上使用能吸引记者关注的主题标签的程度。2020年12月,时间范围扩大到涵盖另外两年的数据,并对所使用的主题标签类型进行了分析。

目的

本研究试图回答以下问题:排名靠前的护理学院在多大程度上使用能在推特上吸引记者、政策制定者和公众关注的主题标签?

方法

2018年2月,排名前50的护理学院中有47所拥有公开的推特账号。从每个账号中提取最近的3200条推文并进行分析。在所涵盖的时间段(2016年9月29日至2018年2月22日)内共有31762条推文。排除13429条转发推文后,剩下18333条推文。2020年12月,最初的47所护理学院中有44所在研究的第一阶段使用相同名称仍拥有公开的推特账号。从2016 - 2018年的数据集中删除了3个不再活跃的账号,得到来自44所护理学院的16939条推文。获取了44所护理学院在研究第二阶段(2018年2月23日至2020年12月13日)所涵盖时间段的推特数据,并从每个账号中提取最近的3200条推文。排除转发推文后,2018 - 2020年的数据集中有40368条推文。将包含16939条推文的2016 - 2018年数据集与包含40368条推文的2018 - 2020年数据集合并,得到2016 - 2020年数据集中的57307条推文。

结果

在2016 - 2020年数据集中使用100次或更多次的每个主题标签被归类为以下七种类型之一:护理、学校、会议或推文聊天、健康、疾病/病症/状况、人群以及其他。然后这些类型被细分为以下两类:对讲机式主题标签和扩音器式主题标签。大约83%的时间里,护理学院使用对讲机式主题标签(专注于行业内部和关于该行业的群体内部讨论的内向型主题标签)。护理学院很少使用外向型扩音器式主题标签。在《》出版后,护理学院使用主题标签的方式没有明显变化。

结论

顶尖护理学院使用主题标签更像是对讲机,用于与其他护士交流,而不是扩音器,以吸引记者、政策制定者和公众的关注。如果护理学院希望媒体将其教职员工展示为专家,他们需要增加扩音器式主题标签的使用,将教职员工的工作与公众感兴趣的话题联系起来。

相似文献

4
The pattern and use of Twitter among dental schools in Saudi Arabia.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 8;17(9):e0272628. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272628. eCollection 2022.
6
Analyzing COVID-19 disinformation on Twitter using the hashtags #scamdemic and #plandemic: Retrospective study.
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 22;17(6):e0268409. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268409. eCollection 2022.
8
#Covid-19: An exploratory investigation of hashtag usage on Twitter.
Health Policy. 2021 Apr;125(4):541-547. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
10
#Radiology: A 7-Year Analysis of Radiology-Associated Hashtags.
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018 Sep;47(5):296-301. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 17.

本文引用的文献

2
The Woodhull Study Revisited: Nurses' Representation in Health News Media 20 Years Later.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018 Nov;50(6):695-704. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12429. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
3
Using social media to engage nurses in health policy development.
J Nurs Manag. 2017 Nov;25(8):632-639. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12501. Epub 2017 Jul 23.
5
Becoming a Public Thought Leader in 140 Characters or Less: How Nurses Can Use Social Media as a Platform.
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv. 2017 Jun 1;55(6):3-4. doi: 10.3928/02793695-20170519-06.
7
Twitter as a tool for communication and knowledge exchange in academic medicine: A guide for skeptics and novices.
Med Teach. 2015 May;37(5):411-6. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.993371. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
8
Health communications: nursing education for increased visibility and effectiveness.
J Prof Nurs. 2000 Jan-Feb;16(1):31-8. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(00)80009-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验