Implementing Holistic Review Practices in a Pulmonary and Critical Care Fellowship.

BACKGROUND

Medical schools have used holistic review in admissions to increase mission-aligned enrollment of students from backgrounds underrepresented in medicine. Graduate medical education programs have increasingly followed suit. However, there is a paucity of literature regarding holistic review at the fellowship level.

OBJECTIVE

Here, we share our experience implementing the Association of American Medical Colleges core principles of holistic review during the 2021 recruitment cycle.

METHODS

We used a partially asynchronous and online learning strategy to train division members on the principles of holistic review. Following the match, we conducted a survey of faculty members and fellows to understand their opinions on our holistic review training and implementation.

RESULTS

Although few of our colleagues clearly understood holistic review before the training, they were able to identify broad-based criteria that aligned with our division's mission and balanced applicants' experiences, attributes, competencies, and metrics. These were viewed as better selection criteria than traditional measures and were incorporated into the individualized consideration of applicants. Our survey had a 41.5% response rate, with 10 of 22 fellows and 24 of 60 faculty members responding. Most faculty members and fellows agreed that holistic review decreases socioeconomic disparities in fellowship recruitment (79.2% and 80.0%, respectively) and promotes inclusion and diversity (83.3% and 90.0%, respectively). Faculty members appeared more confident than fellows that our training efforts had influenced recruitment. All respondents agreed that it would be critical for such training to be repeated yearly.

CONCLUSION

Although this was a single-institution experience, implementing holistic review was feasible and well received by faculty and fellows.