• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医患双方对交换敏感健康社会决定因素信息的看法。

Clinician and Patient Perspectives on the Exchange of Sensitive Social Determinants of Health Information.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

OpenNotes, Division of General Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2444376. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44376.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44376
PMID:39480419
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11528312/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Social determinant of health (SDOH) data are essential to individualized care and reducing health disparities. However, there is little standardization in the way that SDOH data are collected, and barriers to increasing the collection of such data exist at both the patient and clinician levels.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinician, patient, and care partner perspectives on the barriers to and facilitators of patients sharing SDOH information with their clinicians.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study included clinicians, patients, and care partners across the United States. Focus groups were conducted between September 2022 and February 2023 to understand the experience of collecting, documenting, and exchanging SDOH data.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Rapid assessment procedures were used to analyze focus group transcripts, creating summaries, codes, and themes mapped directly to the project research questions.

RESULTS

A total of 235 individuals participated, including 109 (46.4%) clinicians (60 [55.0%] male; 25 [22.9%] Asian, 2 [1.8%] Black, and 74 [67.9%] White) and 126 (53.6%) patients and care partners (45 [35.7%] male; 1 [0.8%] Asian, 48 [38.1%] Black, and 64 [50.8%] White). Clinicians and patients agreed that SDOH data are important for clinicians to know. Both clinicians and patients wanted a structured, standardized way to collect SDOH data in the future, accompanied by time for more in-depth discussion during the visit. However, they highlighted numerous issues that impact collecting these data, including beliefs about how the information will be used, the clinician-patient relationship, having enough of the right staff, time needed to collect SDOH information, and technology used to collect the data (eg, usability, standardization).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This qualitative study of the experience of collecting, documenting, and exchanging SDOH data underscores the ongoing barriers to widespread adoption of uniform approaches to SDOH data documentation as well as factors that may help lower those barriers, such as trusting patient-clinician relationships, greater transparency in how the data will be used, and targeted resources. A multifaceted approach to addressing the concerns raised by clinicians, patients, and care partners is required to ensure that such data can be captured in a way that improves care and allows for progress toward an equitable health care system.

摘要

重要性

社会决定健康因素(SDOH)数据对于个性化护理和减少健康差距至关重要。然而,SDOH 数据的收集方式几乎没有标准化,并且在患者和临床医生层面都存在增加此类数据收集的障碍。

目的

评估临床医生、患者和护理伙伴对患者与临床医生分享 SDOH 信息的障碍和促进因素的看法。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在美国开展的定性研究,包括临床医生、患者和护理伙伴。2022 年 9 月至 2023 年 2 月期间进行了焦点小组,以了解收集、记录和交换 SDOH 数据的经验。

主要结果和措施

快速评估程序用于分析焦点小组的转录本,创建直接针对项目研究问题的摘要、代码和主题。

结果

共有 235 人参与,包括 109 名(46.4%)临床医生(60 名[55.0%]为男性;25 名[22.9%]为亚洲人,2 名[1.8%]为黑人,74 名[67.9%]为白人)和 126 名(53.6%)患者和护理伙伴(45 名[35.7%]为男性;1 名[0.8%]为亚洲人,48 名[38.1%]为黑人,64 名[50.8%]为白人)。临床医生和患者都认为 SDOH 数据对临床医生了解患者很重要。临床医生和患者都希望将来有一种结构化、标准化的方式来收集 SDOH 数据,并在就诊期间有更多时间进行更深入的讨论。然而,他们强调了许多影响收集这些数据的问题,包括对信息将如何使用的看法、医患关系、拥有足够的合适人员、收集 SDOH 信息所需的时间以及用于收集数据的技术(例如,可用性、标准化)。

结论和相关性

这项关于收集、记录和交换 SDOH 数据经验的定性研究强调了在广泛采用统一的 SDOH 数据记录方法方面持续存在的障碍,以及可能有助于降低这些障碍的因素,例如信任的医患关系、更大透明度的信息使用方式,以及有针对性的资源。需要采取多方面的方法来解决临床医生、患者和护理伙伴提出的问题,以确保以改善护理和推进公平医疗保健系统的方式能够捕获这些数据。

相似文献

1
Clinician and Patient Perspectives on the Exchange of Sensitive Social Determinants of Health Information.医患双方对交换敏感健康社会决定因素信息的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2444376. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44376.
2
Are Detailed, Patient-level Social Determinant of Health Factors Associated With Physical Function and Mental Health at Presentation Among New Patients With Orthopaedic Conditions?详细的患者层面的健康社会决定因素是否与新骨科患者就诊时的身体功能和心理健康相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 May 1;481(5):912-921. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002446. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Acceptability of 'as needed' biologic therapy in psoriasis: insights from a multistakeholder mixed-methods study.“按需”生物疗法治疗银屑病的可接受性:来自多方利益相关者混合方法研究的见解。
Br J Dermatol. 2024 Jul 16;191(2):243-251. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljae068.
5
Looking to "Level the Field": A Qualitative Study of How Clinicians Operationalize Social Determinants in Critical Care.寻求“拉平差距”:一项定性研究,探讨临床医生如何在重症监护中实施社会决定因素。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2024 Nov;21(11):1583-1591. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-434OC.
6
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
7
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
8
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
9
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
10
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' Perspectives on Social Barriers to Care and the Acceptability and Impact of a Community Health Worker Program in Outpatient Ophthalmology.患者对门诊眼科护理社会障碍以及社区卫生工作者项目的可接受性和影响的看法。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug 8;19:2647-2657. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S541632. eCollection 2025.
2
Interoperability of health-related social needs data at US hospitals.美国医院健康相关社会需求数据的互操作性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2025 May 1;32(5):914-919. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaf049.

本文引用的文献

1
How Hospitals Are Addressing The Effects Of Racism: A Mixed-Methods Study Of Hospital Equity Officers.医院如何应对种族主义的影响:医院公平事务官员的混合方法研究。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Oct;42(10):1402-1410. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00474.
2
Screening for Health-Related Social Needs and Collaboration With External Partners Among US Hospitals.美国医院的健康相关社会需求筛查和与外部合作伙伴的合作。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2330228. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.30228.
3
Shifting into Action: from Data Segmentation to Equitable Interoperability for Adolescents (and Everyone Else).行动起来:从数据分段到青少年(以及其他所有人)的公平互操作性。
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 May;14(3):544-554. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1769924. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
4
Practical Applications of Rapid Qualitative Analysis for Operations, Quality Improvement, and Research in Dynamically Changing Hospital Environments.快速定性分析在动态变化的医院环境中的运营、质量改进和研究方面的实际应用。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2023 Feb;49(2):98-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2022.11.003. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
5
Trends in Social Spending by Private Health Insurers.私人健康保险公司的社会支出趋势。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(4):1081-1083. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07878-7. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
6
Physician awareness of social determinants of health documentation capability in the electronic health record.医生在电子健康记录中对健康社会决定因素的认知与记录能力。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Nov 14;29(12):2110-2116. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac154.
7
A Novel Mixed Methods Approach Combining Geospatial Mapping and Qualitative Inquiry to Identify Multilevel Policy Targets: The Focused Rapid Assessment Process (fRAP) Applied to Cancer Survivorship.一种结合地理空间映射和定性调查以确定多层次政策目标的新型混合方法:应用于癌症幸存者的聚焦快速评估过程(fRAP)
J Mix Methods Res. 2022 Apr;16(2):183-206. doi: 10.1177/1558689820984273. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
8
Racism in healthcare: a scoping review.医疗保健中的种族主义:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 16;22(1):988. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13122-y.
9
Practical strategies for qualitative inquiry in a virtual world.虚拟世界中定性研究的实用策略。
J Adv Nurs. 2021 Oct;77(10):4035-4044. doi: 10.1111/jan.15000. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
10
Use of Rapid Assessment Procedures when analyzing qualitative data in pharmacy research.在药学研究中分析定性数据时使用快速评估程序。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2022 Jan;18(1):2249-2253. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.05.013. Epub 2021 Jun 6.