Chen Jianguo, Wan Yingying, Jiang Haiyue
Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Xi Yuan Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Platelets. 2022 Apr 3;33(3):339-349. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2021.1961712. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
Several clinical trials exploring the effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) or Achilles tendinopathy (AT) have been published. However, current evidence is limited to small-sized trials. This study aims to evaluate whether PRP improves the outcomes of ATR or AT. PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials comparing PRP injection versus placebo for ATR or AT. Eleven studies with 574 patients were included. Quantitative synthesis suggested that compared with placebo, AT patients in PRP group had higher VISA-A score improvement at six-week follow-up (mean difference (MD) = 2.64; 95% CI) = 1.12 to 4.15). However, there was no significant difference between two groups for VISA-A score improvement at three-month follow-up (MD = 0.93; 95% CI = -2.75 to 4.62), or 6-month follow-up (MD = 5.46; 95% CI = -1.19 to 12.11). In ATR patients, quantitative synthesis suggested that no significant difference was seen between PRP and control group at 3-month, 6-month, and 1-year follow-up. In addition, no significant difference was detected between the two groups in improving tendon thickness and pain for AT patients, and no significant difference was seen in improving heel-rise work, maximum heel-rise height, dorsal and plantar flexion, rate of returning to sports activities, and complication for ATR patients. To conclude, no evidence indicates that PRP injection can improve the patient-reported/clinical/functional outcomes of AT or ATR. The increasing times of PRP injection could improve the outcomes, and further clinical randomized controlled trials are expected to be conducted to verify this hypothesis.
已有多项探索富血小板血浆(PRP)对跟腱断裂(ATR)或跟腱病(AT)影响的临床试验发表。然而,目前的证据仅限于小规模试验。本研究旨在评估PRP是否能改善ATR或AT的治疗效果。通过检索PubMed、科学网、EMBASE和考科蓝图书馆数据库,以确定比较PRP注射与安慰剂治疗ATR或AT的随机对照试验。纳入了11项研究,共574例患者。定量综合分析表明,与安慰剂相比,PRP组的AT患者在六周随访时VISA - A评分改善更高(平均差(MD)= 2.64;95%置信区间(CI)= 1.12至4.15)。然而,在三个月随访时两组VISA - A评分改善无显著差异(MD = 0.93;95% CI = -2.75至4.62),在六个月随访时也无显著差异(MD = 5.46;95% CI = -1.19至12.11)。在ATR患者中,定量综合分析表明,在三个月、六个月和一年随访时,PRP组与对照组之间无显著差异。此外,两组在改善AT患者的肌腱厚度和疼痛方面无显著差异,在改善ATR患者的提踵功、最大提踵高度、背屈和跖屈、恢复体育活动率及并发症方面也无显著差异。总之,没有证据表明PRP注射能改善AT或ATR患者报告的/临床的/功能的结局。增加PRP注射次数可能改善结局,预计将开展进一步的临床随机对照试验来验证这一假设。