Suppr超能文献

子宫内膜癌患者手术方式选择与生存的影响因素分析。

Determinants of Surgical Approach and Survival Among Women with Endometrial Carcinoma.

机构信息

Division of Gynecologic Oncology (Drs. Bixel and Barrington).

Division of Gynecologic Oncology (Drs. Bixel and Barrington).

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Feb;29(2):219-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.07.018. Epub 2021 Aug 1.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate determinants of surgical approach among women with endometrial carcinoma (EC) and associations between surgical approach and overall survival (OS).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

The National Cancer Database, 2010 to 2015.

PATIENTS

A total of 140 470 patients with histologically confirmed EC who underwent hysterectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were grouped according to surgical approach.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 140 470 patients with EC were included. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) was the most common surgical approach (48.8%), followed by laparotomy (33.6%) and traditional laparoscopy (17.6%). Use of RAL increased over the study period, and the percentages of cases managed by laparotomy decreased. Older women, those with insurance, residing in ZIP codes with lower proportions of individuals who did not graduate from high school, and those treated at noncommunity cancer programs were less likely to undergo laparotomy than RAL, and non-white women, those diagnosed with high-grade histology, and those with advanced-stage EC were more likely to undergo laparotomy than RAL. Compared with RAL, all other surgical approaches were associated with worse OS (laparotomy: hazard ratio 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-1.25; traditional laparoscopy: hazard ratio 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.09). Significant effect modification of the surgical approach and OS relationship according to age, race, histology, stage, and adjuvant treatment was observed.

CONCLUSION

RAL increased in frequency over the study period and was associated with improved OS, supporting the continued use of RAL for EC management.

摘要

研究目的

调查子宫内膜癌(EC)患者手术方式的决定因素,以及手术方式与总生存期(OS)之间的关联。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

设置

国家癌症数据库,2010 年至 2015 年。

患者

共纳入 140470 例经组织学证实的接受子宫切除术的 EC 患者。

干预措施

根据手术方式将患者分组。

测量和主要结果

共纳入 140470 例 EC 患者。机器人辅助腹腔镜(RAL)是最常见的手术方式(48.8%),其次是剖腹手术(33.6%)和传统腹腔镜(17.6%)。在研究期间,RAL 的使用率增加,而剖腹手术的比例下降。年龄较大的患者、有保险的患者、居住在高中以下毕业比例较低的邮政编码地区的患者以及在非社区癌症项目治疗的患者,与 RAL 相比,接受剖腹手术的可能性较小,而非白人女性、诊断为高级别组织学的患者和晚期 EC 患者与 RAL 相比,接受剖腹手术的可能性更大。与 RAL 相比,所有其他手术方式与较差的 OS 相关(剖腹手术:风险比 1.21;95%置信区间,1.18-1.25;传统腹腔镜:风险比 1.06;95%置信区间,1.02-1.09)。观察到手术方式和 OS 关系存在年龄、种族、组织学、分期和辅助治疗的显著效应修饰。

结论

RAL 在研究期间的频率增加,并与改善的 OS 相关,支持继续将 RAL 用于 EC 管理。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology.妇科机器人辅助手术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 15;4(4):CD011422. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011422.pub2.
5
Cancer statistics, 2019.癌症统计数据,2019 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34. doi: 10.3322/caac.21551. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验