Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助对II型子宫内膜癌微创手术的影响:一项国家癌症数据库分析

Impact of Robotic Assistance on Minimally Invasive Surgery for Type II Endometrial Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

作者信息

Lamiman Kelly, Silver Michael, Goncalves Nicole, Kim Michael, Alagkiozidis Ioannis

机构信息

Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11220, USA.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY 11215, USA.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jul 19;16(14):2584. doi: 10.3390/cancers16142584.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the overall survival (OS) and surgical outcomes between conventional laparoscopy and robot-assisted laparoscopy (RAL) in women with type II endometrial cancer. We identified a large cohort of women who underwent hysterectomy for type II endometrial cancer between January 2010 and December 2014 using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The primary outcome was to compare the OS of conventional laparoscopy versus RAL. Secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission rate, 90-day mortality, rates of lymph node retrieval, rates of node positivity, and rates of conversion to laparotomy. Cohorts were compared and multivariable logistic regression was used to determine characteristics with statistically significant predictors of outcome. We identified 7168 patients with stage I-III type II endometrial cancer who had minimally invasive surgery as primary treatment between 2010 and 2014. A total of 5074 patients underwent RAL. Women who underwent RAL were less likely to have stage III disease (26.4% vs. 29.9%, = 0.008) and had smaller primary tumors (4.6 vs. 4.1 cm, < 0.001). In a multivariable model, there was no difference in OS between conventional laparoscopy and RAL. With regard to postoperative outcomes, RAL was associated with a decreased risk for conversion to laparotomy (2.7% vs. 12%, < 0.001), a shorter hospital stay (1 vs. 2 days, < 0.001), a decreased 90-day mortality (1.3% vs. 2.2%, = 0.004), and an increased number of lymph nodes sampled (14 vs. 12, < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the use of RAL was independently associated with a reduced rate of conversion to laparotomy. In conclusion, there was no difference in OS between conventional laparoscopy and RAL in type II endometrial cancer in a large retrospective cohort of patients from the NCDB. RAL was associated with a decreased risk of conversion to laparotomy.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较传统腹腔镜手术与机器人辅助腹腔镜手术(RAL)治疗II型子宫内膜癌女性患者的总生存期(OS)和手术结局。我们使用国家癌症数据库(NCDB)确定了一大群在2010年1月至2014年12月期间因II型子宫内膜癌接受子宫切除术的女性。主要结局是比较传统腹腔镜手术与RAL的OS。次要结局包括住院时间、30天再入院率、90天死亡率、淋巴结清扫率、淋巴结阳性率以及中转开腹率。对队列进行比较,并使用多变量逻辑回归来确定具有统计学意义的结局预测因素的特征。我们确定了7168例I-III期II型子宫内膜癌患者,他们在2010年至2014年期间接受了微创手术作为主要治疗方法。共有5074例患者接受了RAL。接受RAL的女性患III期疾病的可能性较小(26.4%对29.9%,P = 0.008),且原发肿瘤较小(4.6对4.1 cm,P < 0.001)。在多变量模型中,传统腹腔镜手术与RAL的OS没有差异。关于术后结局,RAL与中转开腹风险降低相关(2.7%对12%,P < 0.001)、住院时间缩短(1天对2天,P < 0.001)、90天死亡率降低(1.3%对2.2%,P = 0.004)以及采集的淋巴结数量增加(14个对12个,P < 0.001)。在多变量分析中,使用RAL与中转开腹率降低独立相关。总之,在NCDB的一大组回顾性队列患者中,传统腹腔镜手术与RAL治疗II型子宫内膜癌的OS没有差异。RAL与中转开腹风险降低相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f822/11274470/d6df5eb6f97b/cancers-16-02584-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验