• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自动驾驶中的预期驾驶:驾驶经验和分心的影响。

Anticipatory Driving in Automated Vehicles: The Effects of Driving Experience and Distraction.

机构信息

University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2023 Jun;65(4):663. doi: 10.1177/00187208211026133. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

DOI:10.1177/00187208211026133
PMID:34348496
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10210198/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To understand the influence of driving experience and distraction on drivers' anticipation of upcoming traffic events in automated vehicles.

BACKGROUND

In nonautomated vehicles, experienced drivers spend more time looking at cues that indicate upcoming traffic events compared with novices, and distracted drivers spend less time looking at these cues compared with nondistracted drivers. Further, pre-event actions (i.e., proactive control actions prior to traffic events) are more prevalent among experienced drivers and nondistracted drivers. However, there is a research gap on the combined effects of experience and distraction on driver anticipation in automated vehicles.

METHODS

A simulator experiment was conducted with 16 experienced and 16 novice drivers in a vehicle equipped with adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assist systems (resulting in SAE Level 2 driving automation). Half of the participants in each experience group were provided with a self-paced primarily visual-manual secondary task.

RESULTS

Drivers with the task spent less time looking at cues and were less likely to perform anticipatory driving behaviors (i.e., pre-event actions or preparation for pre-event actions such as hovering fingers over the automation disengage button). Experienced drivers exhibited more anticipatory driving behaviors, but their attention toward the cues was similar to novices for both task conditions.

CONCLUSION

In line with nonautomated vehicle research, in automated vehicles, secondary task engagement impedes anticipation while driving experience facilitates anticipation.

APPLICATION

Though Level 2 automation can relieve drivers of manually controlling the vehicle and allow engagement in distractions, visual-manual distraction engagement can impede anticipatory driving and should be restricted.

摘要

目的

了解驾驶经验和分神对自动驾驶汽车驾驶员对即将发生的交通事件的预期的影响。

背景

在非自动驾驶车辆中,经验丰富的驾驶员比新手驾驶员花费更多的时间观察预示即将发生的交通事件的线索,而分神的驾驶员比不分神的驾驶员观察这些线索的时间更少。此外,预事件动作(即在交通事件发生前的主动控制动作)在经验丰富的驾驶员和不分神的驾驶员中更为普遍。然而,在自动驾驶汽车中,经验和分神对驾驶员预期的综合影响方面存在研究空白。

方法

在配备自适应巡航控制和车道保持辅助系统(导致 SAE 级别 2 驾驶自动化)的车辆中,对 16 名经验丰富的驾驶员和 16 名新手驾驶员进行了模拟器实验。在每个经验组中,一半的参与者被分配了一个自我调节的主要视觉-手动次要任务。

结果

有任务的驾驶员观察线索的时间较少,不太可能进行预期的驾驶行为(即,预事件动作或为预事件动作做准备,例如将手指悬停在自动驾驶解除按钮上)。经验丰富的驾驶员表现出更多的预期驾驶行为,但他们在两种任务条件下对线索的注意力与新手驾驶员相似。

结论

与非自动驾驶车辆研究一致,在自动驾驶车辆中,次要任务参与会阻碍驾驶,而驾驶经验则会促进预期。

应用

尽管 2 级自动化可以减轻驾驶员手动控制车辆的负担,并允许驾驶员参与分心,但视觉-手动分心参与可能会阻碍预期驾驶,因此应加以限制。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f311/10210198/86764d72474e/10.1177_00187208211026133-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f311/10210198/7279a50d97db/10.1177_00187208211026133-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f311/10210198/4b647ee72dee/10.1177_00187208211026133-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f311/10210198/c141b7e657e9/10.1177_00187208211026133-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f311/10210198/1447d6c4c3ac/10.1177_00187208211026133-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f311/10210198/86764d72474e/10.1177_00187208211026133-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f311/10210198/7279a50d97db/10.1177_00187208211026133-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f311/10210198/4b647ee72dee/10.1177_00187208211026133-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f311/10210198/c141b7e657e9/10.1177_00187208211026133-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f311/10210198/1447d6c4c3ac/10.1177_00187208211026133-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f311/10210198/86764d72474e/10.1177_00187208211026133-fig5.jpg

相似文献

1
Anticipatory Driving in Automated Vehicles: The Effects of Driving Experience and Distraction.自动驾驶中的预期驾驶:驾驶经验和分心的影响。
Hum Factors. 2023 Jun;65(4):663. doi: 10.1177/00187208211026133. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
2
The Influence of Visual-Manual Distractions on Anticipatory Driving.视觉-手动干扰对驾驶预期的影响。
Hum Factors. 2022 Mar;64(2):401-417. doi: 10.1177/0018720820938893. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
3
In-vehicle displays to support driver anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles.车内显示器以支持自动驾驶车辆中驾驶员对交通冲突的预判。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jan;149:105842. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105842. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
4
Eye glances towards conflict-relevant cues: the roles of anticipatory competence and driver experience.眼看向与冲突相关的线索:预期能力和驾驶员经验的作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Nov;132:105255. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.031. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
5
Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.有效线索可加速年轻驾驶员在条件自动化期间后转移控制权的时间。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jul;116:14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
6
Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.通过非驾驶任务评估自动驾驶员支持系统故障期间驾驶员的反应。
J Safety Res. 2017 Jun;61:149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
7
Investigating the impact of driving automation systems on distracted driving behaviors.研究驾驶自动化系统对分心驾驶行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jun;156:106152. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106152. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
8
Supporting anticipation in driving through attentional and interpretational in-vehicle displays.通过注意力和解释性车载显示器支持驾驶中的预期。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jun;91:103-13. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.02.030. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
9
Impact of non-driving related tasks while operating automated driving systems (ADS): A systematic review.驾驶相关任务对操作自动驾驶系统(ADS)的影响:系统评价。
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Aug;188:107076. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107076. Epub 2023 May 5.
10
The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving.自动驾驶中对运动控制要求对驾驶员眼动模式的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Dec;148:105788. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105788. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Drivers of partially automated vehicles are blamed for crashes that they cannot reasonably avoid.部分自动化车辆的驾驶员应对其无法合理避免的事故负责。
Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 28;12(1):16193. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19876-0.

本文引用的文献

1
In-vehicle displays to support driver anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles.车内显示器以支持自动驾驶车辆中驾驶员对交通冲突的预判。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jan;149:105842. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105842. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
2
The Influence of Visual-Manual Distractions on Anticipatory Driving.视觉-手动干扰对驾驶预期的影响。
Hum Factors. 2022 Mar;64(2):401-417. doi: 10.1177/0018720820938893. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
3
Exploring Trust in Self-Driving Vehicles Through Text Analysis.通过文本分析探索对自动驾驶汽车的信任
Hum Factors. 2020 Mar;62(2):260-277. doi: 10.1177/0018720819872672. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
4
Eye glances towards conflict-relevant cues: the roles of anticipatory competence and driver experience.眼看向与冲突相关的线索:预期能力和驾驶员经验的作用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Nov;132:105255. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.031. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
5
Voluntary- and Involuntary-Distraction Engagement: An Exploratory Study of Individual Differences.自愿性和非自愿性分心参与:个体差异的探索性研究。
Hum Factors. 2018 Jun;60(4):575-588. doi: 10.1177/0018720818761293. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
6
Rage against the machine? Google's self-driving cars versus human drivers.对机器发怒?谷歌的自动驾驶汽车与人类驾驶员
J Safety Res. 2017 Dec;63:57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.08.008. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
7
Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.引言很重要:操纵对自动化的信任和对自动驾驶的依赖。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Jan;66:18-31. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Aug 12.
8
Examining accident reports involving autonomous vehicles in California.审查加利福尼亚州涉及自动驾驶汽车的事故报告。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 20;12(9):e0184952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184952. eCollection 2017.
9
Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.乐观的看法:在“百车”数据中,行车时的扫视指标能区分撞车事故和险些撞车事故。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Oct;107:48-62. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.021. Epub 2017 Aug 5.
10
Designing feedback to mitigate teen distracted driving: A social norms approach.设计反馈以减轻青少年分心驾驶:一种社会规范方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jul;104:185-194. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 May 22.