Suppr超能文献

间质性肺疾病姑息治疗结局指标的范围综述。

A scoping review of palliative care outcome measures in interstitial lung disease.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

Joint first authors.

出版信息

Eur Respir Rev. 2021 Aug 3;30(161). doi: 10.1183/16000617.0080-2021. Print 2021 Sep 30.

Abstract

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) confers a high mortality and symptom burden, substantially impacting quality of life. Studies evaluating palliative care in ILD are rapidly expanding. Uniform outcome measures are crucial to assessing the impact of palliative care in ILD. This scoping review evaluates existing outcome measures in general health-related quality of life (HRQoL), physical health, mental health, social health and advance care planning (ACP) domains in patients with ILD. Articles in English with quantitative assessment of at least one measure of general HRQoL, physical health, mental health, social health or ACP in patients with ILD were included. Searches across three databases yielded 3488 non-duplicate articles. 23 met eligibility criteria and included three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or secondary analysis of an RCT (13%), three cross-sectional studies or secondary analysis of cross-sectional study (13%), one prospective study (4%) and 16 retrospective studies (70%). Among eligible articles, 25 distinct instruments were identified. Six studies assessed general HRQoL (26%), 16 assessed physical health (70%), 11 assessed mental health (48%), six assessed social health (26%) and 16 assessed ACP (70%). The ability to compare results across studies remains challenging given the heterogeneity in outcome measures. Future work is needed to develop core palliative care outcome measures in ILD.

摘要

间质性肺疾病(ILD)死亡率高,症状负担重,严重影响生活质量。评估ILD 姑息治疗的研究正在迅速增加。统一的结局测量指标对于评估ILD 姑息治疗的影响至关重要。本范围综述评估了ILD 患者一般健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)、身体健康、心理健康、社会健康和预先医疗指示(ACP)领域中现有结局测量指标的情况。纳入了评估ILD 患者一般 HRQoL、身体健康、心理健康、社会健康或 ACP 至少一种测量指标的英文文章,且进行了定量评估。在三个数据库中进行搜索,得到了 3488 篇非重复文章。23 篇符合入选标准,包括 3 项随机对照试验(RCT)或 RCT 的二次分析(13%)、3 项横断面研究或横断面研究的二次分析(13%)、1 项前瞻性研究(4%)和 16 项回顾性研究(70%)。在合格的文章中,确定了 25 种不同的工具。6 项研究评估了一般 HRQoL(26%),16 项评估了身体健康(70%),11 项评估了心理健康(48%),6 项评估了社会健康(26%),16 项评估了 ACP(70%)。由于结局测量指标的异质性,仍然难以比较研究结果。未来需要开展ILD 核心姑息治疗结局测量指标的研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/299f/9488671/d869addb056e/ERR-0080-2021.01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验