Shukla Usha, Yadav Urvashi, Yadav Jay Brijesh Singh, Agrawal Sanket
Department of Anaesthesiology, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Saifai, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Oct-Dec;14(4):600-604. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_25_21. Epub 2021 May 27.
Modalities for titrating anesthetic drug-like bispectral index (BIS) and end-tidal anesthetic gas (ETAG) concentration in predicting early extubation had been studied with old anesthetic agents such as isoflurane.
The aim of this study is to compare the effect of ETAG concentration versus BIS-guided protocol as directing tool on time to tracheal extubation for sevoflurane-based general anesthesia.
This prospective, randomized, double-blind trial studied sixty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classes I and II who received sevoflurane-based general anesthesia and were allocated to either BIS-guided anesthesia group ( = 30) or ETAG-guided anesthesia group ( = 30). Time to tracheal extubation was measured. BIS value was kept between 40 and 60 in BIS group, whereas minimum alveolar concentration value was kept between 0.7 and 1.3 in ETAG group. The two groups were compared using Student's -test, and < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The statistical analysis was performed using the open source "R" programming language.
Mean time to tracheal extubation was significantly shorter in BIS group (308.77 ± 20.48 s) as compared to ETAG group (377.90 ± 25.06 s) ( < 0.001). The sevoflurane concentration used was also significantly less in group BIS than group ETAG at multiple time intervals ( = 0.001).
Prediction of extubation was significantly early with BIS monitoring as compared to ETAG monitoring in sevoflurane-based general anesthesia.
使用诸如异氟烷等旧的麻醉药物来滴定麻醉药物样双谱指数(BIS)和呼气末麻醉气体(ETAG)浓度以预测早期拔管的方法已得到研究。
本研究的目的是比较ETAG浓度与BIS引导方案作为指导工具对基于七氟烷的全身麻醉气管拔管时间的影响。
这项前瞻性、随机、双盲试验研究了60例美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级为I级和II级的患者,这些患者接受了基于七氟烷的全身麻醉,并被分配到BIS引导麻醉组(n = 30)或ETAG引导麻醉组(n = 30)。测量气管拔管时间。BIS组的BIS值保持在40至60之间,而ETAG组的最低肺泡浓度值保持在0.7至1.3之间。两组采用学生t检验进行比较,P < 0.05被认为具有统计学意义。使用开源的“R”编程语言进行统计分析。
与ETAG组(377.90 ± 25.06秒)相比,BIS组(308.77 ± 20.48秒)的平均气管拔管时间明显更短(P < 0.001)。在多个时间间隔,BIS组使用的七氟烷浓度也明显低于ETAG组(P = 0.001)。
在基于七氟烷的全身麻醉中,与ETAG监测相比,BIS监测对拔管的预测明显更早。