• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定 2 型糖尿病预防干预措施的关键特征:与主要利益相关者进行的德尔菲研究。

Identifying critical features of type two diabetes prevention interventions: A Delphi study with key stakeholders.

机构信息

Precision Health Future Science Platform, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Adelaide, South Australia.

Public Health and Wellbeing Research Group, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Adelaide, South Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Aug 5;16(8):e0255625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255625. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0255625
PMID:34351966
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8341510/
Abstract

AIMS

This study aims to identify critically important features of digital type two diabetes mellitus (T2DM) prevention interventions.

METHODS

A stakeholder mapping exercise was undertaken to identify key end-user and professional stakeholders, followed by a three-round Delphi procedure to generate and evaluate evidence statements related to the critical elements of digital T2DM prevention interventions in terms of product (intervention), price (funding models/financial cost), place (distribution/delivery channels), and promotion (target audiences).

RESULTS

End-user (n = 38) and professional (n = 38) stakeholders including patients, dietitians, credentialed diabetes educators, nurses, medical doctors, research scientists, and exercise physiologists participated in the Delphi study. Fifty-two critical intervention characteristics were identified. Future interventions should address diet, physical activity, mental health (e.g. stress, diabetes-related distress), and functional health literacy, while advancing behaviour change support. Programs should be delivered digitally or used multiple delivery modes, target a range of population subgroups including children, and be based on collaborative efforts between national and local and government and non-government funded organisations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight strong support for digital health to address T2DM in Australia and identify future directions for T2DM prevention interventions. The study also demonstrates the feasibility and value of stakeholder-led intervention development processes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定数字式 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)预防干预措施的关键重要特征。

方法

进行了利益相关者映射研究,以确定关键的最终用户和专业利益相关者,然后进行了三轮 Delphi 程序,以针对数字 T2DM 预防干预措施的关键要素生成和评估证据陈述,这些要素涉及产品(干预措施)、价格(资金模型/财务成本)、地点(分配/交付渠道)和推广(目标受众)。

结果

最终用户(n=38)和专业利益相关者(n=38),包括患者、营养师、认证的糖尿病教育者、护士、医生、研究科学家和运动生理学家,参与了 Delphi 研究。确定了 52 个关键干预特征。未来的干预措施应针对饮食、身体活动、心理健康(如压力、与糖尿病相关的痛苦)和功能健康素养,同时推进行为改变支持。方案应通过数字化方式提供或使用多种交付模式,针对包括儿童在内的一系列人群亚组,并且基于国家和地方以及政府和非政府资助组织之间的合作努力。

结论

我们的研究结果强烈支持澳大利亚利用数字健康来解决 T2DM 问题,并为 T2DM 预防干预措施确定了未来的方向。该研究还证明了利益相关者主导的干预措施开发过程的可行性和价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5688/8341510/64a15b8e41ba/pone.0255625.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5688/8341510/be58bbd6b2b4/pone.0255625.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5688/8341510/fc40a4143d89/pone.0255625.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5688/8341510/64a15b8e41ba/pone.0255625.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5688/8341510/be58bbd6b2b4/pone.0255625.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5688/8341510/fc40a4143d89/pone.0255625.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5688/8341510/64a15b8e41ba/pone.0255625.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying critical features of type two diabetes prevention interventions: A Delphi study with key stakeholders.确定 2 型糖尿病预防干预措施的关键特征:与主要利益相关者进行的德尔菲研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 5;16(8):e0255625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255625. eCollection 2021.
2
Engaging stakeholders and target groups in prioritising a public health intervention: the Creating Active School Environments (CASE) online Delphi study.让利益相关者和目标群体参与公共卫生干预措施的优先级排序:创建积极的学校环境(CASE)在线德尔菲研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 13;7(1):e013340. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013340.
3
How should health policy and practice respond to the increased genetic risk associated with close relative marriage? results of a UK Delphi consensus building exercise.如何应对与近亲结婚相关的遗传风险增加,这是一个健康政策和实践需要回应的问题。英国德尔菲共识建立研究的结果。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 9;9(7):e028928. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-028928.
4
'We're all in the same boat': A qualitative study on how groups work in a diabetes prevention and management programme.'我们都在同一条船上':一项关于群体在糖尿病预防和管理计划中如何工作的定性研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 Nov;24(4):787-805. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12379. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
5
A core outcome set for evaluating self-management interventions in people with comorbid diabetes and severe mental illness: study protocol for a modified Delphi study and systematic review.评估糖尿病合并严重精神疾病患者自我管理干预措施的核心结局集:一项改良德尔菲研究和系统评价的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Feb 14;18(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1805-y.
6
Development of a core outcome set for diabetes after pregnancy prevention interventions (COS-DAP): a study protocol.产后糖尿病预防干预核心结局集(COS-DAP)的制定:一项研究方案
Trials. 2018 Dec 29;19(1):708. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3072-y.
7
360-degree Delphi: addressing sociotechnical challenges of healthcare IT.360 度德尔菲法:应对医疗信息技术的社会技术挑战。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1071-x.
8
Accelerating implementation of adolescent digital health prevention programs: analysis of insights from Australian stakeholders.加速实施青少年数字健康预防计划:对澳大利亚利益相关者的见解进行分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 3;12:1389739. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1389739. eCollection 2024.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
A Latino Patient-Centered, Evidence-Based Approach to Diabetes Prevention.一种以拉丁裔患者为中心的、基于证据的糖尿病预防方法。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 May-Jun;31(3):364-374. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170280.

引用本文的文献

1
Rating versus ranking in a Delphi survey: a randomized controlled trial.德尔菲调查中的评分与排名:一项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2023 Aug 18;24(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07442-6.
2
Holistic mHealth interventions for the promotion of healthy ageing: protocol for a systematic review.整体化移动医疗干预措施促进健康老龄化:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 2;13(5):e066662. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066662.
3
Influences on Patient Uptake of and Engagement With the National Health Service Digital Diabetes Prevention Programme: Qualitative Interview Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Participatory digital health research: A new paradigm for mHealth tool development.参与式数字健康研究:移动健康工具开发的新范式。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020 Sep-Oct;66:67-69. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.07.005. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
2
A systematic review of the behaviour change techniques and digital features in technology-driven type 2 diabetes prevention interventions.对技术驱动型2型糖尿病预防干预措施中的行为改变技术和数字特征的系统评价。
Digit Health. 2020 Mar 24;6:2055207620914427. doi: 10.1177/2055207620914427. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
3
Public and patient participation in health policy, care and research.
影响患者参与国家卫生服务数字糖尿病预防计划的因素:定性访谈研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 28;25:e40961. doi: 10.2196/40961.
4
Disrupting future discounting: a commentary on an underutilised psychological approach for improving adherence to diet and physical activity interventions.扰乱未来折扣:一种对改善饮食和体育活动干预措施依从性的未充分利用的心理方法的评论。
Public Health Nutr. 2023 May;26(5):1088-1093. doi: 10.1017/S136898002200252X. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
5
Standardized evaluation of the quality and persuasiveness of mobile health applications for diabetes management.标准化评估移动医疗应用程序在糖尿病管理方面的质量和说服力。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 7;12(1):3639. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07544-2.
6
Co-design of a digital dietary intervention for adults at risk of type 2 diabetes.针对 2 型糖尿病风险人群的数字化饮食干预措施的共同设计。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 11;21(1):2071. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12102-y.
公众和患者参与卫生政策、医疗保健及研究。
Porto Biomed J. 2017 Mar-Apr;2(2):31-32. doi: 10.1016/j.pbj.2017.01.001. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
4
Epidemiology of Type 2 Diabetes - Global Burden of Disease and Forecasted Trends.2 型糖尿病的流行病学——全球疾病负担和预测趋势。
J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2020 Mar;10(1):107-111. doi: 10.2991/jegh.k.191028.001.
5
User Engagement and Attrition in an App-Based Physical Activity Intervention: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.基于应用程序的体育活动干预中的用户参与度和流失率:一项随机对照试验的二次分析
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 27;21(11):e14645. doi: 10.2196/14645.
6
The Continued Use of Mobile Health Apps: Insights From a Longitudinal Study.移动医疗应用的持续使用:一项纵向研究的新发现。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Aug 29;7(8):e12983. doi: 10.2196/12983.
7
Digital health technology and mobile devices for the management of diabetes mellitus: state of the art.数字健康技术和移动设备在糖尿病管理中的应用:现状。
Diabetologia. 2019 Jun;62(6):877-887. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4864-7. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
8
Sustainable Adoption of Digital Health Innovations: Perspectives From a Stakeholder Workshop.数字健康创新的可持续采用:利益相关者研讨会的观点
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 25;21(3):e11922. doi: 10.2196/11922.
9
The Efficacy of Mobile Phone Apps for Lifestyle Modification in Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.手机应用程序在糖尿病生活方式改变中的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 15;7(1):e12297. doi: 10.2196/12297.
10
Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys.与 COS 德尔菲调查中较低的应答率显著相关的项目数量更多。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;108:110-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.12.010. Epub 2018 Dec 15.