• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

发展中国家极低出生体重儿和早产儿肠内营养结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。

ELBW and ELGAN outcomes in developing nations-Systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Ankura Hospital for Women and Children, Hyderabad, India.

Department of Neonatology, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Chennai, India.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2021 Aug 5;16(8):e0255352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255352. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0255352
PMID:34352883
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8342042/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Morbidity and mortality amongst extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGANs) in developing nations has not been well studied.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate survival until discharge, short- and long-term morbidities of ELBW and ELGANs in LMICs.

DATA SOURCES

CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science.

STUDY SELECTION

Prospective and retrospective observational studies were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Four authors extracted data independently. Random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was used to synthesize data, modified QUIPS scale to evaluate quality of studies and GRADE approach to ascertain the certainty of evidence (CoE).

RESULTS

192 studies enrolling 22,278 ELBW and 18,338 ELGANs were included. Survival was 34% (95% CI: 31% - 37%) (CoE-low) for ELBW and 39% (34% - 44%) (CoE-moderate) for ELGANs. For ELBW neonates, the survival for low-income (LI), lower middle-income (LMI) and upper middle income (UMI) countries was 18% (11% - 28%), 28% (21% - 35%) and 39% (36% - 42%), respectively. For ELGANs, it was 13% (8% - 20%) for LI, 28% (21% - 36%) for LMI and 48% (42% - 53%) for UMI countries. There was no difference in survival between two epochs: 2000-2009 and 2010-2020. Except for necrotising enterocolitis [ELBW and ELGANs-8% (7% - 10%)] and periventricular leukomalacia [ELBW-7% (4% - 11%); ELGANs-6% (5%-7%)], rates of all other morbidities were higher compared to developed nations. Rates of neurodevelopmental impairment was 17% (7% - 34%) in ELBW neonates and 29% (23% - 37%) in ELGANs.

LIMITATIONS

CoE was very low to low for all secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality and morbidity amongst ELBW and ELGANs is still a significant burden in LMICs. CoE was very low to low for all the secondary outcomes, emphasizing the need for high quality prospective cohort studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42020222873).

摘要

背景

发展中国家极低出生体重(ELBW)和极早早产儿(ELGANs)的发病率和死亡率尚未得到充分研究。

目的

评估中低收入国家 ELBW 和 ELGANs 的存活率直至出院、短期和长期发病率。

数据来源

CENTRAL、EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 Web of Science。

研究选择

纳入前瞻性和回顾性观察性研究。

数据提取和综合

四位作者独立提取数据。使用比例的随机效应荟萃分析来综合数据,修改 QUIPS 量表评估研究质量,使用 GRADE 方法确定证据的确定性(CoE)。

结果

纳入了 192 项研究,涉及 22278 名 ELBW 和 18338 名 ELGANs。ELBW 的存活率为 34%(95%CI:31%-37%)(CoE-低),ELGANs 的存活率为 39%(34%-44%)(CoE-中)。对于 ELBW 新生儿,低收入(LI)、中低收入(LMI)和中上收入(UMI)国家的存活率分别为 18%(11%-28%)、28%(21%-35%)和 39%(36%-42%)。对于 ELGANs,LI 国家的存活率为 13%(8%-20%),LMI 国家为 28%(21%-36%),UMI 国家为 48%(42%-53%)。两个时期(2000-2009 年和 2010-2020 年)之间的存活率没有差异。除坏死性小肠结肠炎[ELBW 和 ELGANs-8%(7%-10%)]和脑室周围白质软化[ELBW-7%(4%-11%);ELGANs-6%(5%-7%)]外,其他所有发病率均高于发达国家。ELBW 新生儿的神经发育障碍发生率为 17%(7%-34%),ELGANs 为 29%(23%-37%)。

局限性

所有次要结局的 CoE 均为极低至低。

结论

极低出生体重和极早早产儿在中低收入国家仍然是一个重大负担。所有次要结局的 CoE 均为极低至低,这强调了需要高质量的前瞻性队列研究。

试验注册

PROSPERO(CRD42020222873)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7804/8342042/01827dc9911c/pone.0255352.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7804/8342042/100e44fcab71/pone.0255352.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7804/8342042/a1a586d7197c/pone.0255352.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7804/8342042/01827dc9911c/pone.0255352.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7804/8342042/100e44fcab71/pone.0255352.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7804/8342042/a1a586d7197c/pone.0255352.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7804/8342042/01827dc9911c/pone.0255352.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
ELBW and ELGAN outcomes in developing nations-Systematic review and meta-analysis.发展中国家极低出生体重儿和早产儿肠内营养结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 5;16(8):e0255352. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255352. eCollection 2021.
2
Effect of umbilical cord milking on morbidity and survival in extremely low gestational age neonates.脐带血采集对极低胎龄儿发病率和存活率的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;211(5):519.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.05.037. Epub 2014 May 29.
3
Outcome of extremely low gestational age newborns (ELGANs) following a pro-active treatment approach: a Swiss single centre experience over 10 years.积极治疗方法下极早早产儿(ELGANs)的结局:瑞士单中心10年经验
Swiss Med Wkly. 2014 Sep 25;144:w14014. doi: 10.4414/smw.2014.14014. eCollection 2014.
4
A national short-term follow-Up study of extremely low birth weight infants born in Finland in 1996-1997.一项对1996 - 1997年在芬兰出生的极低出生体重婴儿的全国性短期随访研究。
Pediatrics. 2001 Jan;107(1):E2. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.1.e2.
5
Slow advancement of enteral feed volumes to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants.缓慢增加肠内喂养量以预防极低出生体重儿坏死性小肠结肠炎
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 30;8(8):CD001241. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001241.pub7.
6
Predictors of mortality and major morbidities in extremely low birth weight neonates.极低出生体重新生儿死亡和主要并发症的预测因素
Indian Pediatr. 2013 Dec;50(12):1119-23. doi: 10.1007/s13312-013-0305-8. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
7
Micro-premature infants in New Jersey show improved mortality and morbidity from 2000-2018.新泽西州的微早产儿在 2000 年至 2018 年期间的死亡率和发病率有所改善。
J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2021;14(4):583-590. doi: 10.3233/NPM-200599.
8
Mortality and morbidity of extremely low birth weight infants in Hong Kong, 2010-2017: a single-centre review.2010 - 2017年香港极低出生体重婴儿的死亡率和发病率:单中心回顾
Hong Kong Med J. 2018 Oct;24(5):460-465. doi: 10.12809/hkmj177181.
9
Early outcome of extremely low birth weight infants in Taiwan.台湾极低出生体重儿的早期结局。
J Formos Med Assoc. 1998 Jul;97(7):471-6.
10
Survival and Neurodevelopmental Outcome of Extremely-Low-Birth-Weight Infants at One Year of Age-A Prospective, Descriptive Study.极低出生体重儿一岁时的生存及神经发育结局——一项前瞻性描述性研究
Indian J Pediatr. 2023 Mar;90(3):233-239. doi: 10.1007/s12098-022-04252-7. Epub 2022 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective cohort study of premature neonatal mortality rates and contributing factors in a tertiary referral NICU in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia from 2022 to 2023.2022年至2023年在埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴一家三级转诊新生儿重症监护病房对早产新生儿死亡率及其影响因素进行的一项回顾性队列研究。
Clin Epidemiol Glob Health. 2025 Jul-Aug;34. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2025.102118. Epub 2025 Jul 7.
2
Global inequities in the survival of extremely preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.极早产儿生存方面的全球不平等:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):579. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05933-w.
3
Three studies needed to inform the design of the U-BET (umbilical cord blood for extremely low-gestational-age transfusions) clinical trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Global burden of preterm birth.全球早产儿负担。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020 Jul;150(1):31-33. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13195.
2
Perinatal management of extreme preterm birth before 27 weeks of gestation: a framework for practice.孕27周前极早早产的围产期管理:实践框架
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020 May;105(3):232-239. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-318402. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
3
Mapping 123 million neonatal, infant and child deaths between 2000 and 2017.绘制 2000 年至 2017 年期间 1.23 亿例新生儿、婴儿和儿童死亡情况。
需要三项研究为超低孕周输血脐带血(U-BET)临床试验的设计提供信息。
J Perinatol. 2025 Jul 28. doi: 10.1038/s41372-025-02345-7.
4
Neuroprotective effects of antenatal magnesium sulfate on neurodevelopmental outcomes in very low birth weight preterm infants: A 2-year follow-up study.产前硫酸镁对极低出生体重早产儿神经发育结局的神经保护作用:一项为期2年的随访研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jul 18;104(29):e43385. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000043385.
5
Born too soon: global epidemiology of preterm birth and drivers for change.早产:全球早产流行病学及变革驱动因素
Reprod Health. 2025 Jun 23;22(Suppl 2):105. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-02033-x.
6
Seasonal pattern of preterm birth in the Netherlands: A population-based retrospective cohort study.荷兰早产的季节性模式:一项基于人群的回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2025 May 27;20(5):e0324873. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324873. eCollection 2025.
7
Association between micronutrient supplementation during pregnancy and preterm birth: evidence from a large-scale children survey and Mendelian randomization study.孕期微量营养素补充与早产之间的关联:来自大规模儿童调查和孟德尔随机化研究的证据。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 9;13:1451006. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1451006. eCollection 2025.
8
The prevalence of long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm-born children in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of developmental outcomes in 72 974 preterm-born children.低收入和中等收入国家早产儿长期神经发育结局的患病率:对72974名早产儿发育结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Glob Health. 2025 Apr 4;15:04106. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.04106.
9
Risk factors for early periventricular intraventricular hemorrhage in extremely low birth weight infants: a retrospective study.极低出生体重儿早期脑室周围脑室内出血的危险因素:一项回顾性研究
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jan 24;25(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05390-5.
10
A systematic review and meta-analysis of breastfeeding and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infant.早产婴儿母乳喂养与神经发育结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 21;12:1401250. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1401250. eCollection 2024.
Nature. 2019 Oct;574(7778):353-358. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1545-0. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
4
Outcomes at 18 to 22 Months of Corrected Age for Infants Born at 22 to 25 Weeks of Gestation in a Center Practicing Active Management.22 至 25 孕周出生婴儿在积极管理中心的校正年龄 18 至 22 个月的结局。
J Pediatr. 2020 Feb;217:52-58.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.08.028. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
5
Economic assessment of neonatal intensive care.新生儿重症监护的经济评估
Transl Pediatr. 2019 Jul;8(3):246-256. doi: 10.21037/tp.2019.07.03.
6
The clinical management and outcomes of extremely preterm infants in Japan: past, present, and future.日本极早产儿的临床管理与预后:过去、现在与未来
Transl Pediatr. 2019 Jul;8(3):199-211. doi: 10.21037/tp.2019.07.10.
7
Care practices and neonatal survival in 52 neonatal intensive care units in Telangana and Andhra Pradesh, India: A cross-sectional study.印度特伦甘纳邦和安得拉邦 52 家新生儿重症监护病房的护理实践与新生儿存活率:一项横断面研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Jul 23;16(7):e1002860. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002860. eCollection 2019 Jul.
8
Association Between Year of Birth and 1-Year Survival Among Extremely Preterm Infants in Sweden During 2004-2007 and 2014-2016.2004-2007 年和 2014-2016 年期间瑞典极度早产儿出生年份与 1 年生存率的关系。
JAMA. 2019 Mar 26;321(12):1188-1199. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.2021.
9
Assessing the deprivation gap in stillbirths and neonatal deaths by cause of death: a national population-based study.评估因死因导致的死产和新生儿死亡的剥夺差距:一项全国性基于人群的研究。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2019 Nov;104(6):F624-F630. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2018-316124. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
10
Survival and Impairment of Extremely Premature Infants: A Meta-analysis.极度早产儿的生存和发育障碍:一项荟萃分析。
Pediatrics. 2019 Feb;143(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-0933.