• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

COVID-19 时代及之后的过量用药反应的定性研究:如何发现有人处于危险中,这样他们就不必独自面对。

A qualitative study on overdose response in the era of COVID-19 and beyond: how to spot someone so they never have to use alone.

机构信息

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

MAP Center for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Harm Reduct J. 2021 Aug 5;18(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00530-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12954-021-00530-3
PMID:34353323
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8339679/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spotting is an informal practice among people who use drugs (PWUD) where they witness other people using drugs and respond if an overdose occurs. During COVID-19 restrictions, remote spotting (e.g., using a telephone, video call, and/or a social media app) emerged to address physical distancing requirements and reduced access to harm reduction and/or sexually transmitted blood borne infection (STBBI's) prevention services. We explored spotting implementation issues from the perspectives of spotters and spottees.

METHODS

Research assistants with lived/living expertise of drug use used personal networks and word of mouth to recruit PWUD from Ontario and Nova Scotia who provided or used informal spotting. All participants completed a semi-structured, audio-recorded telephone interview about spotting service design, benefits, challenges, and recommendations. Recordings were transcribed and thematic analysis was used.

RESULTS

We interviewed 20 individuals between 08/2020-11/2020 who were involved in informal spotting. Spotting was provided on various platforms (e.g., telephone, video calls, and through texts) and locations (e.g. home, car), offered connection and community support, and addressed barriers to the use of supervised consumption sites (e.g., location, stigma, confidentiality, safety, availability, COVID-19 related closures). Spotting calls often began with setting an overdose response plan (i.e., when and who to call). Many participants noted that, due to the criminalization of drug use and fear of arrest, they preferred that roommates/friends/family members be called instead of emergency services in case of an overdose. Both spotters and spottees raised concerns about the timeliness of overdose response, particularly in remote and rural settings.

CONCLUSION

Spotting is a novel addition to, but not replacement for, existing harm reduction services. To optimize overdose/COVID-19/STBBI's prevention services, additional supports (e.g., changes to Good Samaritan Laws) are needed. The criminalization of drug use may limit uptake of formal spotting services.

摘要

背景

在吸毒者中,发现是一种非正式的做法,即他们观察其他人使用毒品,如果发生过量,就会做出反应。在 COVID-19 限制期间,出现了远程发现(例如,使用电话、视频通话和/或社交媒体应用程序),以满足保持身体距离的要求,并减少获得减少伤害和/或性传播血液传染病(STBBI)预防服务的机会。我们从发现者和被发现者的角度探讨了发现实施方面的问题。

方法

具有吸毒生活/经验的研究助理利用个人网络和口碑从安大略省和新斯科舍省招募提供或使用非正式发现的吸毒者。所有参与者都完成了关于发现服务设计、益处、挑战和建议的半结构化、录音电话访谈。录音被转录,并使用主题分析。

结果

我们在 2020 年 8 月至 11 月期间采访了 20 名参与非正式发现的个人。发现是在各种平台(例如电话、视频通话和通过短信)和地点(例如家庭、汽车)上提供的,提供了联系和社区支持,并解决了使用监督消费场所的障碍(例如位置、耻辱感、保密性、安全性、可用性、与 COVID-19 相关的关闭)。发现电话通常从制定过量反应计划开始(即何时何地打电话)。许多参与者指出,由于吸毒的刑事化和对被捕的恐惧,他们更喜欢在发生过量的情况下,由室友/朋友/家人而不是紧急服务来打电话。发现者和被发现者都对过量反应的及时性表示担忧,尤其是在偏远和农村地区。

结论

发现是对现有减少伤害服务的补充,而不是替代。为了优化过量/COVID-19/STBBI 预防服务,需要额外的支持(例如,修改好撒玛利亚人法)。吸毒的刑事化可能会限制对正式发现服务的接受。

相似文献

1
A qualitative study on overdose response in the era of COVID-19 and beyond: how to spot someone so they never have to use alone.COVID-19 时代及之后的过量用药反应的定性研究:如何发现有人处于危险中,这样他们就不必独自面对。
Harm Reduct J. 2021 Aug 5;18(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00530-3.
2
Spotting as a risk mitigation method: A qualitative study comparing organization-based and informal methods.将发现作为一种风险缓解方法:一项比较基于组织的方法和非正式方法的定性研究。
Int J Drug Policy. 2023 Jan;111:103905. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103905. Epub 2022 Nov 12.
3
Perspectives of key interest groups regarding supervised Consumption sites (SCS) and novel virtual harm reduction services / overdose response hotlines and applications: a qualitative Canadian study.关键利益相关群体对监督消费场所 (SCS) 和新型虚拟减少伤害服务/ 过量反应热线和应用的看法:一项加拿大定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Jul 27;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01053-3.
4
Harm reduction via online platforms for people who use drugs in Russia: a qualitative analysis of web outreach work.通过在线平台减少俄罗斯吸毒者的伤害:网络外展工作的定性分析。
Harm Reduct J. 2020 Dec 9;17(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00452-6.
5
Multi-level influences on increased overdose risk behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic among people who use drugs in Rhode Island: a qualitative investigation.多层面影响罗德岛吸毒者在新冠疫情期间过量用药风险行为增加:定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Feb 4;20(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00741-w.
6
"It's just a perfect storm": Exploring the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on overdose risk in British Columbia from the perspectives of people who use substances.“这简直是完美风暴”:从使用物质的人的角度探讨 COVID-19 大流行对不列颠哥伦比亚省药物过量风险的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 3;23(1):640. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15474-5.
7
Client experiences using a new supervised consumption service in Sudbury, Ontario: A qualitative study.安大略省萨德伯里市新开设的监督消费服务的客户体验:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Oct 16;18(10):e0292862. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292862. eCollection 2023.
8
Barriers to calling emergency services amongst people who use substances in the event of overdose: A scoping review.在发生药物过量的情况下,使用物质的人拨打紧急服务的障碍:范围综述。
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Oct;132:104559. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104559. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
9
Understanding the public health consequences of suspending a rural syringe services program: a qualitative study of the experiences of people who inject drugs.了解暂停农村注射器服务项目对公共卫生的影响:对注射毒品者的经验进行的定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2019 May 21;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12954-019-0305-7.
10
Bridging the Gap in Harm Reduction Using Mobile Overdose Response Services (MORS) in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.利用新冠肺炎疫情背景下的移动药物过量应对服务弥合减少伤害方面的差距:一项定性研究。
J Urban Health. 2024 Apr;101(2):252-261. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00846-y. Epub 2024 Mar 21.

引用本文的文献

1
"I think that that really could benefit a lonely user:" perceptions of overdose response hotlines among people who use opioids.“我认为这确实可能使孤独的使用者受益”:阿片类药物使用者对过量用药应对热线的看法。
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Jul 18;22(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01283-z.
2
Using illicit drugs alone in Vancouver, Canada: a gender-based analysis.在加拿大温哥华单独使用非法药物:基于性别的分析。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2025 Feb 22;20(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13011-025-00637-x.
3
Predictors of overdose response hotline use for mental health and fatal overdose prevention.用于预防心理健康和致命药物过量的过量反应热线使用的预测因素。
Can J Public Health. 2025 Feb 18. doi: 10.17269/s41997-024-00981-8.
4
Strategies used to reduce harms associated with fentanyl exposure among rural people who use drugs: multi-site qualitative findings from the rural opioid initiative.用于减少农村吸毒人群中芬太尼暴露相关危害的策略:农村阿片倡议的多地点定性研究结果。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Aug 24;21(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01062-2.
5
Opioid-related deaths in Northern Ontario in the early COVID-19 pandemic period.安大略省北部在新冠疫情早期与阿片类药物相关的死亡情况。
Can J Public Health. 2024 Jul 29. doi: 10.17269/s41997-024-00906-5.
6
Perspectives of key interest groups regarding supervised Consumption sites (SCS) and novel virtual harm reduction services / overdose response hotlines and applications: a qualitative Canadian study.关键利益相关群体对监督消费场所 (SCS) 和新型虚拟减少伤害服务/ 过量反应热线和应用的看法:一项加拿大定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Jul 27;21(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-01053-3.
7
Using qualitative system dynamics modeling to understand overdose bystander behavior in the context of Connecticut's Good Samaritan Laws and identify effective policy options.运用定性系统动力学建模来理解康涅狄格州好撒玛利亚人法背景下的旁观者过量用药行为,并确定有效的政策选择。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Jun 27;21(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00990-3.
8
Psychosocial factors associated with overdose subsequent to Illicit Drug use: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.与非法药物使用后过量相关的心理社会因素:系统评价和叙述性综合。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Apr 15;21(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00999-8.
9
Bridging the Gap in Harm Reduction Using Mobile Overdose Response Services (MORS) in the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Study.利用新冠肺炎疫情背景下的移动药物过量应对服务弥合减少伤害方面的差距:一项定性研究。
J Urban Health. 2024 Apr;101(2):252-261. doi: 10.1007/s11524-024-00846-y. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
10
Preference for hotline versus mobile application/countdown-based mobile overdose response services: a qualitative study.对热线与移动应用程序/基于倒计时的过量用药应对服务的偏好:一项定性研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Feb 5;21(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00944-9.

本文引用的文献

1
CDC Warns of Surge in Drug Overdose Deaths During COVID-19.美国疾病控制与预防中心警告称,新冠疫情期间药物过量致死人数激增。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jan 4;2(1):e210001. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.0001.
2
Adapting harm reduction services during COVID-19: lessons from the supervised injecting facilities in Australia.在 COVID-19 期间调整减少伤害服务:来自澳大利亚监督注射设施的经验教训。
Harm Reduct J. 2021 Feb 17;18(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00471-x.
3
Women's multiple uses of an overdose prevention technology to mitigate risks and harms within a supportive housing environment: a qualitative study.妇女在支持性住房环境中多次使用过量预防技术以减轻风险和危害:一项定性研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Feb 2;21(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01196-6.
4
Convenience and comfort: reasons reported for using drugs alone among clients of harm reduction sites in British Columbia, Canada.便利与舒适:加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省的减少伤害服务点使用者自述使用药物的原因。
Harm Reduct J. 2020 Nov 23;17(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00436-6.
5
Operational and contextual barriers to accessing supervised consumption services in two Canadian cities.在加拿大的两个城市中,获得监督消费服务存在运营和背景方面的障碍。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Feb;88:102991. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102991. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
6
The effectiveness of drug-related Good Samaritan laws: A review of the literature.药物相关好心人法律的有效性:文献综述。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Apr;90:102773. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102773. Epub 2020 May 25.
7
Supervised injection facility use and exposure to violence among a cohort of people who inject drugs: A gender-based analysis.一组注射吸毒者中监督注射设施的使用情况及遭受暴力的情况:基于性别的分析。
Int J Drug Policy. 2020 Apr;78:102692. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102692. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
8
Acceptability of technological solutions for overdose monitoring: Perspectives of people who use drugs.技术解决方案对药物过量监测的可接受性:药物使用者的观点。
Subst Abus. 2021;42(3):284-293. doi: 10.1080/08897077.2019.1680479. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
9
'It's our safe sanctuary': Experiences of using an unsanctioned overdose prevention site in Toronto, Ontario.“这是我们的安全避难所”:安大略省多伦多市使用未经批准的过量预防场所的体验。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Nov;73:135-140. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.09.019. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
10
'It's too much, I'm getting really tired of it': Overdose response and structural vulnerabilities among harm reduction workers in community settings.“太多了,我真的受够了”:在社区环境中,减少伤害工作者的过量反应和结构脆弱性。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Dec;74:127-135. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.09.012. Epub 2019 Oct 4.