Silva Wegina Jordana, Lopes Leonardo, Galdino Melyssa Kellyane Cavalcanti, Almeida Anna Alice
Department of Speech Therapy, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB) and Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
Department of Speech Therapy, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB), Graduate Program in Speech Therapy, Federal University of Paraíba (UFPB) and Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN - PPgFon), Graduate Program in Decision and Health Models (PPgMDS), and Graduate Program in Linguistic (PROLING) of UFPB, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil.
J Voice. 2024 Jan;38(1):77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.06.018. Epub 2021 Aug 2.
To analyze whether voice acoustic parameters are discriminant and predictive in patients with and without depression.
Observational case-control study. The following instruments were administered to the participants: Self-Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20), Beck Depression Inventory-Second Edition (BDI-II), Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS) and voice collection for subsequent extraction of the following acoustic parameters: mean, mode and standard deviation (SD) of the fundamental frequency (F0); jitter; shimmer; glottal to noise excitation ratio (GNE); cepstral peak prominence-smoothed (CPPS); and spectral tilt. A total of 144 individuals participated in the study: 54 patients diagnosed with depression (case group) and 90 without a diagnosis of depression (control group).
The means of the acoustic parameters showed differences between the groups: F0 (SD), jitter, and shimmer values were high, while values for GNE, CPPS and spectral tilt were lower in the case group than in the control group. There was a significant association between BDI-II and jitter, shimmer, CPPS, and spectral tilt and between CPPS and the class of antidepressants used. The multiple linear regression model showed that jitter and CPPS were predictors of depression, as measured by the BDI-II.
Acoustic parameters were able to discriminate between patients with and without depression and were associated with BDI-II scores. The class of antidepressants used was associated with CPPS, and the jitter and CPPS parameters were able to predict the presence of depression, as measured by the BDI-II clinical score.
分析语音声学参数在抑郁症患者与非抑郁症患者中是否具有判别能力和预测能力。
观察性病例对照研究。对参与者使用了以下工具:自评问卷(SRQ-20)、贝克抑郁量表第二版(BDI-II)、嗓音症状量表(VoiSS),并采集嗓音用于后续提取以下声学参数:基频(F0)的均值、众数和标准差(SD);抖动;闪烁;声门与噪声激励比(GNE);谐波峰值突出度-平滑(CPPS);以及频谱倾斜度。共有144人参与了该研究:54例被诊断为抑郁症的患者(病例组)和90例未被诊断为抑郁症的患者(对照组)。
声学参数的均值在两组之间存在差异:病例组的F0(SD)、抖动和闪烁值较高,而GNE、CPPS和频谱倾斜度的值低于对照组。BDI-II与抖动、闪烁、CPPS和频谱倾斜度之间以及CPPS与所用抗抑郁药类别之间存在显著关联。多元线性回归模型显示,抖动和CPPS是BDI-II所衡量的抑郁症的预测指标。
声学参数能够区分抑郁症患者与非抑郁症患者,并与BDI-II评分相关。所用抗抑郁药类别与CPPS相关,并且抖动和CPPS参数能够预测BDI-II临床评分所衡量的抑郁症的存在。