An Yoshimori, Ogawa Hisashi, Yanagisawa Masami, Marumiya Chifuyu, Ikeda Syuhei, Akao Masaharu
Department of Cardiology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Department of Clinical Engineering, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
J Cardiol Cases. 2021 Feb 27;24(2):89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2021.02.004. eCollection 2021 Aug.
A 64-year-old man with no previous medical history underwent catheter ablation (CA) by right pulmonary vein isolation and creation of an anteroseptal mitral isthmus (MI) line for peri-mitral atrial flutter. Since atrial tachycardia (AT) recurred with palpitation 4 months later, a second CA session was performed. Although the differential pacing method appeared to confirm the conduction block across the MI line previously created, single-loop bi-atrial AT (Bi-AT) involving both atria through the septum was induced. When the upper septum of the right atrium was ablated, Bi-AT was terminated. Of note, the time from the onset of the P-wave to activation of the left atrial appendage increased after the ablation compared to before. Learning objective: The anteroseptal mitral isthmus line between the right superior pulmonary vein and the septal mitral annulus is an effective therapy for peri-mitral atrial flutter. However, there are some problems such as difficulty in assessing the bidirectional block of this line and the occurrence of bi-atrial tachycardia via the Bachmann bundle. Further investigation needs to clarify whether conduction block of this interatrial bundle is an appropriate endpoint, as the clinical impacts of conduction delay of left atrial appendage remain uncertain. < The anteroseptal mitral isthmus line between the right superior pulmonary vein and the septal mitral annulus is an effective therapy for peri-mitral atrial flutter However, there are some problems such as difficulty in assessing the bidirectional block of this line and the occurrence of biatrial atrial tachycardia via the Bachmann bundle. Further investigation needs to clarify whether conduction block of this interatrial bundle is an appropriate endpoint as the clinical impacts of conduction delay of left atrial appendage remain uncertain.>.
一名64岁无既往病史的男性因二尖瓣周围房扑接受了经右肺静脉隔离及创建前间隔二尖瓣峡部(MI)线的导管消融术(CA)。4个月后因心悸复发出现房性心动过速(AT),遂进行了第二次CA手术。尽管采用鉴别起搏方法似乎证实了先前创建的MI线存在传导阻滞,但仍诱发了通过间隔累及双房的单环双房AT(Bi-AT)。当消融右心房上间隔时,Bi-AT终止。值得注意的是,与消融前相比,消融后P波起始至左心耳激活的时间增加。学习目标:右上肺静脉与间隔二尖瓣环之间的前间隔二尖瓣峡部线是治疗二尖瓣周围房扑的有效方法。然而,存在一些问题,如难以评估该线的双向阻滞以及通过Bachmann束发生双房性心动过速。由于左心耳传导延迟的临床影响仍不确定,进一步研究需要明确该房间束的传导阻滞是否为合适的终点。<右上肺静脉与间隔二尖瓣环之间的前间隔二尖瓣峡部线是治疗二尖瓣周围房扑的有效方法。然而,存在一些问题,如难以评估该线的双向阻滞以及通过Bachmann束发生双房性心动过速。由于左心耳传导延迟的临床影响仍不确定,进一步研究需要明确该房间束的传导阻滞是否为合适的终点。>