• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生如何在与患者的交谈中构建医学信息?一种归纳式微观分析。

How Do Physicians Frame Medical Information in Talks With Their Patients? An Inductive Microanalysis.

机构信息

Healthcare Services Research Unit (HØKH), Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskøg, Norway.

Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Lorenskøg, Norway.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2024 Jan;34(1-2):101-113. doi: 10.1177/10497323231205152. Epub 2023 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1177/10497323231205152
PMID:37870935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10714701/
Abstract

During medical consultations, physicians need to share a substantial amount of information with their patients. this information is framed can be crucial for patient understanding and outcomes, but little is known about the details of how physicians frame information in practice. Using an inductive microanalysis approach in the study of videotaped medical interactions, we aimed to identify the (i.e., higher-level ways of organizing and structuring information to reach a particular purpose) and the (i.e., any dialogic mechanism used to present information in a particular way that shapes how the patient might perceive and interpret it) physicians use spontaneously and intuitively while sharing information with their patients. We identified 66 different information-framing devices acting within nine information frames conveying: (1) Do we agree that we share this knowledge?, (2) I don't like where I (or where you are) am going with this, (3) This may be tricky to understand, (4) You may need to think, (5) This is important, (6) This is not important, (7) This comes from me as a doctor, (8) This comes from me as a person, and (9) This is directed to you as a unique person. The kaleidoscope of information-framing devices described in this study reveals the near impossibility for neutrality and objectivity in the information-sharing practice of medical care. It also represents an inductively derived starting point for further research into aspects of physicians' information-sharing praxis.

摘要

在医疗咨询中,医生需要与患者分享大量信息。信息的呈现方式对于患者的理解和治疗效果至关重要,但我们对于医生在实践中如何呈现信息的具体细节知之甚少。本研究采用归纳式微观分析方法,对录像医疗互动进行研究,旨在确定医生在与患者分享信息时,自发且直观使用的信息框架(即,以特定目的组织和构建信息的更高层次方式)和信息呈现方式(即,用于以特定方式呈现信息的任何对话机制,从而影响患者对信息的感知和解释)。我们确定了 66 种不同的信息框架手段,它们在九个信息框架中发挥作用,传递了以下信息:(1)我们是否同意我们分享这个知识?(2)我不喜欢我们现在的进展方向。(3)这可能很难理解。(4)你可能需要思考。(5)这很重要。(6)这并不重要。(7)这是作为医生的我提供的。(8)这是作为个人的我提供的。(9)这是针对你个人的。本研究中描述的信息框架手段的万花筒揭示了医疗保健中信息共享实践中几乎不可能保持中立和客观。它也代表了进一步研究医生信息共享实践方面的一个归纳式起点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb34/10714701/13254315a66d/10.1177_10497323231205152-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb34/10714701/13254315a66d/10.1177_10497323231205152-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb34/10714701/13254315a66d/10.1177_10497323231205152-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
How Do Physicians Frame Medical Information in Talks With Their Patients? An Inductive Microanalysis.医生如何在与患者的交谈中构建医学信息?一种归纳式微观分析。
Qual Health Res. 2024 Jan;34(1-2):101-113. doi: 10.1177/10497323231205152. Epub 2023 Oct 23.
2
General practitioners' comments on video recorded consultations as an aid to understanding the doctor-patient relationship.全科医生对视频录制会诊作为辅助理解医患关系的评论。
Fam Pract. 1990 Jun;7(2):84-90. doi: 10.1093/fampra/7.2.84.
3
Saying "I Don't Know": A Video-Based Study on Physicians' Claims of No-Knowledge in Assisted Reproductive Technology Consultations.说“我不知道”:一项基于视频的关于医生在辅助生殖技术咨询中声称不知情的研究。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 12;11:611074. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.611074. eCollection 2020.
4
"The Record is Our Work Tool!"-Physicians' Framing of a Patient Portal in Sweden.“记录是我们的工作工具!”——瑞典医生对患者门户网站的框架构建
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Jun 27;18(6):e167. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5705.
5
A microanalysis of the clarity of information in physicians' and patients' discussions of treatment plans with and without language barriers.对有语言障碍和无语言障碍情况下医生与患者讨论治疗方案时信息清晰度的微观分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Apr;99(4):522-529. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
6
A comparison of videotape and audiotape assessment of patient-centredness in family physicians' consultations.家庭医生会诊中以患者为中心程度的录像带与录音带评估比较
Patient Educ Couns. 2001 Nov;45(2):107-10. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(00)00199-3.
7
In what way may videotapes be used to get significant information about the patient-physician relationship?录像带可以通过哪些方式用于获取有关医患关系的重要信息?
Med Teach. 1990;12(2):197-208. doi: 10.3109/01421599009006697.
8
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
9
Physicians' responses to patients' expressions of negative emotions in hospital consultations: a video-based observational study.医生在医院就诊中对患者负面情绪表达的反应:基于视频的观察性研究。
Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Sep;84(3):332-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.001. Epub 2011 Mar 31.
10

引用本文的文献

1
What influences how physicians frame information for patients? An explorative quantitative study on hospital interactions from different specialties.是什么影响医生向患者传达信息的方式?一项关于不同专科医院医患互动的探索性定量研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 8;15(9):e097474. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097474.
2
Struggling in no-man's land between childhood and adulthood - a phenomenological-hermeneutical video-observation study exploring adolescent males' encounters with general practitioners.在童年与成年之间的无人地带挣扎——一项现象学-诠释学视频观察研究,探索青少年男性与全科医生的接触经历。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2025 Sep;43(3):563-575. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2025.2475507. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Training physicians in providing complex information to patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomised controlled trial.培训医生向多发性硬化症患者提供复杂信息:一项随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 15;12(3):e049817. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049817.
2
Effects of Physicians' Information Giving on Patient Outcomes: a Systematic Review.医生信息提供对患者结局的影响:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Feb;37(3):651-663. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07044-5. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
3
Message Design Choices Don't Make Much Difference to Persuasiveness and Can't Be Counted On-Not Even When Moderating Conditions Are Specified.
T1 colorectal cancer patients' perspective on information provision and therapeutic decision-making after local resection.
T1期结直肠癌患者对局部切除术后信息提供与治疗决策的看法。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2024 Dec;12(10):1367-1377. doi: 10.1002/ueg2.12628. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
信息设计选择对说服力影响不大,且无法依赖——即使规定了调节条件也是如此。
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 29;12:664160. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.664160. eCollection 2021.
4
Using Applied Conversation Analysis in Patient Education.在患者教育中运用应用会话分析
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2021 May 28;8:23333936211012990. doi: 10.1177/23333936211012990. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
5
Tested communication strategies for providing information to patients in medical consultations: A scoping review and quality assessment of the literature.测试在医学咨询中为患者提供信息的沟通策略:文献范围综述和质量评估。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Aug;104(8):1891-1903. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.01.019. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
6
Framing as a Concept for Health Communication: A Systematic Review.框架作为健康传播的一个概念:系统评价。
Health Commun. 2021 Jun;36(7):891-899. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1723048. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
7
Cognitive Bias: The Downside of Shared Decision Making.认知偏差:共同决策的弊端
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2018 Dec;2:1-10. doi: 10.1200/CCI.18.00011.
8
Factors associated with patient recall of key information in ambulatory specialty care visits: Results of an innovative methodology.门诊专科护理就诊中与患者对关键信息的回忆相关的因素:一种创新方法的结果。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 1;13(2):e0191940. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191940. eCollection 2018.
9
Validation of the Norwegian version of MAPPIN'SDM, an observation-based instrument to measure shared decision-making in clinical encounters.挪威版MAPPIN'SDM的验证,这是一种基于观察的工具,用于衡量临床诊疗过程中的共同决策。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Mar;100(3):534-541. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.023. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
10
From Theory to Practice: Measuring end-of-life communication quality using multiple goals theory.从理论到实践:运用多重目标理论衡量临终沟通质量
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 May;100(5):909-918. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 15.