Suppr超能文献

EXTRIP工作组关于巴氯芬中毒体外治疗的建议。

Recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup on extracorporeal treatment for baclofen poisoning.

作者信息

Ghannoum Marc, Berling Ingrid, Lavergne Valéry, Roberts Darren M, Galvao Tais, Hoffman Robert S, Nolin Thomas D, Lewington Andrew, Doi Kent, Gosselin Sophie

机构信息

Research Center, CIUSSS du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, University of Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Kidney Int. 2021 Oct;100(4):720-736. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.07.014. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

Abstract

Baclofen toxicity results from intentional self-poisoning (acute baclofen poisoning) or accumulation of therapeutic dose in the setting of impaired kidney function. Standard care includes baclofen discontinuation, respiratory support and seizure treatment. Use of extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) is controversial. To clarify this, a comprehensive review of the literature on the effect of ECTRs in baclofen toxicity was performed and recommendations following EXTRIP methods were formulated based on 43 studies (1 comparative cohort, 1 aggregate results cohort, 1 pharmacokinetic modeling, and 40 patient reports or series). Toxicokinetic data were available for 20 patients. Baclofen's dialyzability is limited by a high endogenous clearance and a short half-life in patients with normal kidney function. The workgroup assessed baclofen as "Moderately dialyzable" by intermittent hemodialysis for patients with normal kidney function (quality of evidence C) and "Dialyzable" for patients with impaired kidney function (quality of evidence C). Clinical data were available for 25 patients with acute baclofen poisoning and 46 patients with toxicity from therapeutic baclofen in kidney impairment. No deaths or sequelae were reported. Mortality in historical controls was rare. No benefit of ECTR was identified in patients with acute baclofen poisoning. Indirect evidence suggests a benefit of ECTR in reducing the duration of toxic encephalopathy from therapeutic baclofen in kidney impairment. These potential benefits were balanced against added costs and harms related to the insertion of a catheter, the procedure itself, and the potential of baclofen withdrawal. Thus, the EXTRIP workgroup suggests against performing ECTR in addition to standard care for acute baclofen poisoning and suggests performing ECTR in toxicity from therapeutic baclofen in kidney impairment, especially in the presence of coma requiring mechanical ventilation.

摘要

巴氯芬中毒可由故意自我中毒(急性巴氯芬中毒)或在肾功能受损情况下治疗剂量的累积所致。标准治疗包括停用巴氯芬、呼吸支持和癫痫治疗。体外治疗(ECTRs)的使用存在争议。为了阐明这一点,对关于ECTRs在巴氯芬中毒中的作用的文献进行了全面综述,并根据EXTRIP方法,基于43项研究(1项比较队列研究、1项汇总结果队列研究、1项药代动力学建模研究以及40项病例报告或病例系列研究)制定了建议。有20名患者提供了毒代动力学数据。在肾功能正常的患者中,巴氯芬的透析性受到高内源性清除率和短半衰期的限制。工作组评估,对于肾功能正常的患者,通过间歇性血液透析,巴氯芬为“中度可透析”(证据质量C);对于肾功能受损的患者,巴氯芬为“可透析”(证据质量C)。有25例急性巴氯芬中毒患者和46例肾功能损害时治疗性巴氯芬中毒患者提供了临床数据。未报告死亡或后遗症情况。历史对照中的死亡率很低。在急性巴氯芬中毒患者中未发现ECTR有任何益处。间接证据表明,ECTR在减少肾功能损害时治疗性巴氯芬所致中毒性脑病持续时间方面有一定益处。这些潜在益处与插入导管、操作本身以及巴氯芬撤药的潜在相关成本和危害相权衡。因此,EXTRIP工作组建议,对于急性巴氯芬中毒,除标准治疗外,不建议进行ECTR;对于肾功能损害时治疗性巴氯芬中毒,建议进行ECTR,尤其是在存在需要机械通气的昏迷情况下。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验