Suppr超能文献

左乙拉西坦在胶质母细胞瘤中的应用如何?一项机构经验及荟萃分析。

How about Levetiracetam in Glioblastoma? An Institutional Experience and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Jabbarli Ramazan, Ahmadipour Yahya, Rauschenbach Laurèl, Santos Alejandro N, Darkwah Oppong Marvin, Pierscianek Daniela, Quesada Carlos M, Kebir Sied, Dammann Philipp, Guberina Nika, Scheffler Björn, Kaier Klaus, Stuschke Martin, Sure Ulrich, Wrede Karsten H

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.

German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 27;13(15):3770. doi: 10.3390/cancers13153770.

Abstract

Despite multimodal treatment, the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma (GBM) remains poor. Previous studies showed conflicting results on the effect of antiepileptic drugs (AED) on GBM survival. We investigated the associations of different AED with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in a large institutional GBM cohort ( = 872) treated January 2006 and December 2018. In addition, we performed a meta-analysis of previously published studies, including this study, to summarize the evidence on the value of AED for GBM prognosis. Of all perioperatively administered AED, only the use of levetiracetam (LEV) was associated with longer OS (median: 12.8 vs. 8.77 months, < 0.0001) and PFS (7 vs. 4.5 months, = 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, LEV was independently associated with longer OS (aHR = 0.74, = 0.017) and PFS (aHR = 0.68, = 0.008). In the meta-analysis with 5614 patients from the present and seven previously published studies, outcome benefit for OS (HR = 0.83, = 0.02) and PFS (HR = 0.77, = 0.02) in GBM individuals with LEV was confirmed. Perioperative treatment with LEV might improve the prognosis of GBM patients. We recommend a prospective randomized controlled trial addressing the efficacy of LEV in GBM treatment.

摘要

尽管采用了多模式治疗,胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)患者的预后仍然很差。先前的研究在抗癫痫药物(AED)对GBM生存期的影响方面显示出相互矛盾的结果。我们调查了2006年1月至2018年12月期间在一个大型机构性GBM队列(n = 872)中不同AED与总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的关联。此外,我们对包括本研究在内的先前发表的研究进行了荟萃分析,以总结AED对GBM预后价值的证据。在所有围手术期使用的AED中,只有左乙拉西坦(LEV)的使用与更长的OS(中位数:12.8个月对8.77个月,P<0.0001)和PFS(7个月对4.5个月,P = 0.001)相关。在多变量分析中,LEV与更长的OS(aHR = 0.74,P = 0.017)和PFS(aHR = 0.68,P = 0.008)独立相关。在对来自本研究和其他七项先前发表研究的5614名患者进行的荟萃分析中,证实了LEV对GBM患者OS(HR = 0.83,P = 0.02)和PFS(HR = 0.77,P = 0.02)的预后益处。围手术期使用LEV可能改善GBM患者的预后。我们建议进行一项前瞻性随机对照试验,以探讨LEV在GBM治疗中的疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9232/8345097/9c8a20afb097/cancers-13-03770-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验