• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医护人员安全绩效:经修正的工作场所健康与安全工具的验证与应用。

Safety Performance of Healthcare Professionals: Validation and Use of the Adapted Workplace Health and Safety Instrument.

机构信息

Institute for Patient Safety (IfPS), University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.

Center for Health Communication and Health Services Research (CHSR), Department for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Bonn, 53127 Bonn, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 23;18(15):7816. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157816.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18157816
PMID:34360109
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8345542/
Abstract

Improving patient safety and reducing occupational accidents are two of the main challenges in healthcare. Instruments to measure safety performance and occupational safety are rare. This study aimed to prepare and validate a German version of the adapted workplace health and safety instrument to assess the safety performance of healthcare professionals. Overall, 168 healthcare professionals participated in this explorative cross-sectional study. The instrument consists of 16 items related to safety performance in four dimensions. We calculated mean values and standard deviations for each individual item and those of the four dimensions of the instrument. We evaluated internal consistency and construct validity, explored the dimensionality of the instrument through exploratory factor analysis, and tested how our data fit with the original model with confirmatory factor analysis. Among the participants, 73.8% were nurses and nurses in training, with the majority of the sample being female (71.9%) and younger than 30 (52.5%). Cronbach's alpha for all four dimensions was >0.7. All items were loaded on factors according to the original theoretical model. Confirmatory factor analysis showed good model fit (normed χ²/df = 1.43 (≤2.5), root mean square error of approximation = 0.06 (≤0.07), goodness of fit index = 0.90 (>0.90), comparative fit index = 0.95 (≥0.90), and Tucker-Lewis index = 0.93 (>0.90). The German version of the instrument demonstrated acceptable properties and was a good fit to the original theoretical model, allowing measurement of healthcare professionals' safety knowledge, motivation, compliance, and participation.

摘要

提高患者安全和减少职业事故是医疗保健领域的两个主要挑战。衡量安全绩效和职业安全的工具很少。本研究旨在制备和验证经过改编的工作场所健康和安全工具的德语版本,以评估医疗保健专业人员的安全绩效。共有 168 名医疗保健专业人员参与了这项探索性横断面研究。该工具包含与四个维度的安全绩效相关的 16 个项目。我们计算了每个项目和工具四个维度的平均值和标准差。我们评估了内部一致性和结构有效性,通过探索性因素分析探讨了工具的维度,并通过验证性因素分析测试了我们的数据与原始模型的拟合程度。在参与者中,73.8%是护士和护士培训生,大多数样本是女性(71.9%),年龄小于 30 岁(52.5%)。所有四个维度的 Cronbach 的 alpha 值均大于 0.7。所有项目均根据原始理论模型加载到因子上。验证性因素分析显示模型拟合良好(归一化 χ²/df = 1.43(≤2.5),近似均方根误差 = 0.06(≤0.07),拟合优度指数 = 0.90(>0.90),比较拟合指数 = 0.95(≥0.90),和 Tucker-Lewis 指数 = 0.93(>0.90)。该工具的德语版本具有可接受的特性,与原始理论模型拟合良好,可测量医疗保健专业人员的安全知识、动机、合规性和参与度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04b9/8345542/7baed4fe5873/ijerph-18-07816-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04b9/8345542/7baed4fe5873/ijerph-18-07816-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/04b9/8345542/7baed4fe5873/ijerph-18-07816-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety Performance of Healthcare Professionals: Validation and Use of the Adapted Workplace Health and Safety Instrument.医护人员安全绩效:经修正的工作场所健康与安全工具的验证与应用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 23;18(15):7816. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157816.
2
Evaluation of psychometric properties of the German Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture and its potential for cross-cultural comparisons: a cross-sectional study.评估德国医院患者安全文化调查的心理测量特性及其进行跨文化比较的潜力:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 9;7(11):e018366. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018366.
3
Psychometric properties of the Georgian version of Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture: a cross-sectional study.格鲁吉亚版患者安全文化医院调查量表的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 29;9(7):e030972. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030972.
4
Evaluating the cross-cultural competence instrument for healthcare professionals (CCCHP) among nurses in Okinawa, Japan.评估日本冲绳地区护士的医疗保健专业人员跨文化能力工具(CCCHP)。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 23;24(1):369. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10814-6.
5
Development and validation of a novel cosmetics safety assessment scale (CSAS): Factual understanding of cosmetic safety and fostering international awareness.开发和验证一种新型化妆品安全评估量表(CSAS):对化妆品安全性的事实理解和促进国际意识。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 10;17(11):e0276938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276938. eCollection 2022.
6
The Swedish version of the TeamSTEPPS® teamwork attitudes questionnaire (T-TAQ): A validation study.《团队 STEPPS® 工作态度问卷(T-TAQ)的瑞典语版本:一项验证研究》。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 30;21(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06111-1.
7
Psychometric properties of the Georgian version of the Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: a cross-sectional study.格鲁吉亚版安全态度问卷的心理测量特性:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 13;10(2):e034863. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034863.
8
[French validation of the Verona Service Satisfaction Scale-VSSS-54F].[《维罗纳服务满意度量表 - VSSS - 54F》的法语验证]
Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):110-8.
9
Cross-cultural validation and psychometric testing of the Norwegian version of the TeamSTEPPS® teamwork perceptions questionnaire.《团队STEPPS®团队合作认知问卷挪威语版的跨文化验证与心理测量测试》
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 2;17(1):799. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2733-y.
10
Validation of the Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS) and development of the Brief-MSCS among hospice and healthcare professionals: a confirmatory factor analysis approach to validation.验证正念自我关怀量表(MSCS)在临终关怀和医疗保健专业人员中的有效性:验证的验证性因子分析方法。
Palliat Support Care. 2019 Dec;17(6):628-636. doi: 10.1017/S1478951519000269.

引用本文的文献

1
The relational effects of perceived organizational support, fear of COVID-19, and work-related stress on the safety performance of healthcare workers.感知到的组织支持、对新冠病毒的恐惧以及工作相关压力对医护人员安全绩效的关联影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 10;13:963683. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.963683. eCollection 2022.
2
Safety Performance in Acute Medical Care: A Qualitative, Explorative Study on the Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals.急性医疗护理中的安全绩效:一项关于医疗保健专业人员观点的定性探索性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Nov 12;9(11):1543. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9111543.

本文引用的文献

1
Degree of Integration Between Occupational Safety and Health Programs and Wellness Programs: First-year Results From an Insurer-Sponsored Wellness Grant for Smaller Employers.职业安全与健康计划与健康促进计划的融合程度:保险公司为小型雇主提供的健康促进补助计划的第一年结果。
J Occup Environ Med. 2019 Sep;61(9):704-717. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000001644.
2
Healthcare professionals' perspectives on working conditions, leadership, and safety climate: a cross-sectional study.医疗保健专业人员对工作条件、领导力和安全氛围的看法:一项横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 21;19(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3862-7.
3
When safety climate is not enough: Examining the moderating effects of psychosocial hazards on nurse safety performance.
当安全氛围还不够时:检验心理社会危害对护士安全绩效的调节作用。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Jun;75(6):1207-1218. doi: 10.1111/jan.13911. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
4
Psychometric properties of the Persian version of Neal and Griffin's safety performance scale.尼尔和格里芬安全绩效量表波斯语版的心理测量学特性。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2021 Mar;27(1):41-47. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1504853. Epub 2018 Sep 7.
5
Participatory approaches to workplace safety management: bridging the gap between behavioral safety and participatory ergonomics.参与式工作场所安全管理方法:弥合行为安全与参与式工效学之间的差距。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020 Mar;26(1):194-203. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1438221. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
6
Understanding emergency workers' behavior and perspectives on design and safety in the workplace.了解应急救援人员在工作场所对设计和安全的行为及看法。
Appl Ergon. 2017 Mar;59(Pt A):73-83. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.08.023. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
7
Health care professionals' skills regarding patient safety.医疗保健专业人员在患者安全方面的技能。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2016;52(4):250-256. doi: 10.1016/j.medici.2016.05.004. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
8
Integrated Approaches to Occupational Health and Safety: A Systematic Review.职业健康与安全的综合方法:系统综述
Am J Health Promot. 2017 Sep;31(5):401-412. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.141027-LIT-542. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
9
Griffin and Neal's safety model: Determinants and components of individual safety performance in the Italian context.格里芬和尼尔的安全模型:意大利背景下个体安全绩效的决定因素和组成部分。
Med Lav. 2015 Nov 22;106(6):447-59.
10
Development and Validation of a Safety Climate Scale for Manufacturing Industry.制造业安全气候量表的开发与验证
Saf Health Work. 2015 Jun;6(2):97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Feb 17.