Suppr超能文献

参与式工作场所安全管理方法:弥合行为安全与参与式工效学之间的差距。

Participatory approaches to workplace safety management: bridging the gap between behavioral safety and participatory ergonomics.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Troy University, USA.

Queens College, The City University of New York, USA.

出版信息

Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2020 Mar;26(1):194-203. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2018.1438221. Epub 2018 Mar 13.

Abstract

Many researchers and practitioners argue the importance of end-user involvement in workplace safety management, but the research literature and practices remain fractured across orientations. The primary aim of this article is to bridge the gap between two major participatory safety management approaches: behavioral safety and participatory ergonomics. First, an overview and brief history of participative management is presented to provide context for its application to workplace safety. Next, behavioral safety and participatory ergonomics are separately examined in terms of their origins and core elements. Finally, based on this examination, unifying elements between behavioral safety and participatory ergonomics will be presented to provide a comprehensive account of participatory safety management.

摘要

许多研究人员和从业者都认为终端用户参与工作场所安全管理的重要性,但研究文献和实践仍然在不同的方向上存在分歧。本文的主要目的是弥合两种主要的参与式安全管理方法(行为安全和参与式人体工效学)之间的差距。首先,本文概述并简要介绍了参与式管理的历史,为其在工作场所安全中的应用提供了背景。其次,分别从起源和核心要素两个方面对行为安全和参与式人体工效学进行了考察。最后,基于这些考察,提出了行为安全和参与式人体工效学之间的统一要素,以提供参与式安全管理的全面描述。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验