School of Design & China Institute for Urban Governance, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 800 Dongchuan Rd., Minhang District, Shanghai 200240, China.
Research Center for Eco-Environment Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shuangqing Rd. 18, Beijing 100085, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 31;18(15):8130. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158130.
With the global increase in population and urban expansion, the simultaneous rise of social demand and degradation of ecosystems is omnipresent, especially in the urban agglomerations of China. In order to manage environmental problems and match ecosystem supply and social demand, these urban agglomerations promoted regional socio-ecological integration but ignored differential city management during the process of integration. Therefore, it is necessary to design a general framework linking ecosystem supply and social demand to differential city management. In addition, in previous studies, ecosystem services supply-demand amount (mis)match assessment was emphasized, but ecosystem services supply-demand type (mis)match assessment was ignored, which may lead to biased decisions. To deal with these problems, this study presented a general ecosystem services framework with six core steps for differential city management and developed a double-indices (amount and type) method to identify ecosystem services supply-demand (mis)matches in an urban agglomeration. This framework and the double-indices method were applied in the case study of the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration. Ecosystem supply-demand amount and type (mis)match levels and spatial pattern of twenty-six cities were identified. Twenty-six cities in the YRDUA were classified into five kinds of cities with different levels of ES supply-demand (mis)matches for RS, three kinds of cities for PS, and four kinds of cities for CS. Differential city management strategies were designed. Despite its limitations, this study can be a reference to giving insights into ES supply-demand (mis)match assessment and management.
随着全球人口的增长和城市的扩张,社会需求的同时上升和生态系统的退化无处不在,特别是在中国的城市群中。为了管理环境问题并匹配生态系统的供应和社会需求,这些城市群在一体化的过程中促进了区域社会-生态一体化,但忽略了差异化的城市管理。因此,有必要设计一个将生态系统供应与社会需求联系起来的通用框架,以实现差异化的城市管理。此外,在以前的研究中,强调了生态系统服务供给-需求数量(不)匹配评估,但忽略了生态系统服务供给-需求类型(不)匹配评估,这可能导致决策出现偏差。针对这些问题,本研究提出了一个通用的生态系统服务框架,包含六个核心步骤,用于差异化的城市管理,并开发了一种双指标(数量和类型)方法来识别城市群中的生态系统服务供给-需求(不)匹配。该框架和双指标方法应用于长三角城市群的案例研究。确定了 26 个城市的生态系统供给-需求数量和类型(不)匹配水平和空间格局。长三角城市群的 26 个城市被分为五类,具有不同水平的生态系统供给-需求(不)匹配,分别为 RS 类、PS 类和 CS 类。设计了差异化的城市管理策略。尽管存在局限性,但本研究可以为生态系统供给-需求(不)匹配评估和管理提供参考。