• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迈向全球可定制的生态系统服务模型。

Towards globally customizable ecosystem service models.

机构信息

BC3-Basque Centre for Climate Change, Sede Building 1, 1st floor, Scientific Campus of the University of the Basque Country, 48940 Leioa, Spain.

U.S. Geological Survey, Geosciences & Environmental Change Science Center, PO Box 25046, MS 980, Denver, CO 80225, USA.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 10;650(Pt 2):2325-2336. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.371. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.371
PMID:30292124
Abstract

Scientists, stakeholders and decision makers face trade-offs between adopting simple or complex approaches when modeling ecosystem services (ES). Complex approaches may be time- and data-intensive, making them more challenging to implement and difficult to scale, but can produce more accurate and locally specific results. In contrast, simple approaches allow for faster assessments but may sacrifice accuracy and credibility. The ARtificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services (ARIES) modeling platform has endeavored to provide a spectrum of simple to complex ES models that are readily accessible to a broad range of users. In this paper, we describe a series of five "Tier 1" ES models that users can run anywhere in the world with no user input, while offering the option to easily customize models with context-specific data and parameters. This approach enables rapid ES quantification, as models are automatically adapted to the application context. We provide examples of customized ES assessments at three locations on different continents and demonstrate the use of ARIES' spatial multi-criteria analysis module, which enables spatial prioritization of ES for different beneficiary groups. The models described here use publicly available global- and continental-scale data as defaults. Advanced users can modify data input requirements, model parameters or entire model structures to capitalize on high-resolution data and context-specific model formulations. Data and methods contributed by the research community become part of a growing knowledge base, enabling faster and better ES assessment for users worldwide. By engaging with the ES modeling community to further develop and customize these models based on user needs, spatiotemporal contexts, and scale(s) of analysis, we aim to cover the full arc from simple to complex assessments, minimizing the additional cost to the user when increased complexity and accuracy are needed.

摘要

科学家、利益相关者和决策者在对生态系统服务(ES)建模时,需要在采用简单或复杂方法之间做出权衡。复杂方法可能需要大量的时间和数据,因此实施起来更具挑战性,也难以推广,但可以产生更准确和更具本地化的结果。相比之下,简单方法可以更快地进行评估,但可能会牺牲准确性和可信度。人工智能生态系统服务(ARIES)建模平台致力于提供一系列简单到复杂的 ES 模型,供广泛的用户使用。在本文中,我们描述了一系列五个“第 1 层”ES 模型,用户无需任何输入即可在世界任何地方运行,同时还提供了使用特定于上下文的数据和参数轻松自定义模型的选项。这种方法可以实现 ES 的快速量化,因为模型会自动适应应用场景。我们提供了在三个不同大洲的三个地点进行定制 ES 评估的示例,并展示了如何使用 ARIES 的空间多标准分析模块,该模块可以为不同受益群体对 ES 进行空间优先级排序。这里描述的模型使用公共的全球和大陆尺度数据作为默认值。高级用户可以修改数据输入要求、模型参数或整个模型结构,以利用高分辨率数据和特定于上下文的模型公式。研究社区贡献的数据和方法成为不断增长的知识库的一部分,为全球用户提供更快更好的 ES 评估。通过与 ES 建模社区合作,根据用户需求、时空背景和分析的规模进一步开发和定制这些模型,我们旨在涵盖从简单到复杂评估的全过程,在需要增加复杂性和准确性时,最大限度地降低用户的额外成本。

相似文献

1
Towards globally customizable ecosystem service models.迈向全球可定制的生态系统服务模型。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 10;650(Pt 2):2325-2336. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.371. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
2
A methodology for adaptable and robust ecosystem services assessment.一种适用于生态系统服务评估的灵活且稳健的方法。
PLoS One. 2014 Mar 13;9(3):e91001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091001. eCollection 2014.
3
Coordinating ecosystem service trade-offs to achieve win-win outcomes: A review of the approaches.协调生态系统服务权衡,实现双赢结果:方法综述。
J Environ Sci (China). 2019 Aug;82:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2019.02.030. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
4
A conservation decision-making framework based on ecosystem service hotspot and interaction analyses on multiple scales.基于生态系统服务热点和多尺度相互作用分析的保护决策框架。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Dec 1;643:277-291. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.103. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
5
Identifying and assessing the application of ecosystem services approaches in environmental policies and decision making.识别与评估生态系统服务方法在环境政策及决策中的应用。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2017 Jan;13(1):41-51. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1836. Epub 2016 Sep 3.
6
Modeling the influence of alternative forest management scenarios on wood production and carbon storage: A case study in the Mediterranean region.建模不同森林管理情景对木材生产和碳储存的影响:以地中海地区为例。
Environ Res. 2016 Jan;144(Pt B):72-87. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.10.025. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
7
Assessing chemical risk within an ecosystem services framework: Implementation and added value.在生态系统服务框架内评估化学风险:实施和附加值。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Oct 15;791:148631. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148631. Epub 2021 Jun 29.
8
Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles.生态系统服务束中的历史动态
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 27;112(43):13411-6. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1502565112. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
9
Mapping Ecosystem Services to Human Well-being: a toolkit to support integrated landscape management for the SDGs.将生态系统服务与人类福祉联系起来:一个支持综合景观管理以实现可持续发展目标的工具包。
Ecol Appl. 2019 Dec;29(8):e01985. doi: 10.1002/eap.1985. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
10
Rapid Assessment of Ecosystem Service Co-Benefits of Biodiversity Priority Areas in Madagascar.马达加斯加生物多样性优先区域生态系统服务协同效益的快速评估
PLoS One. 2016 Dec 22;11(12):e0168575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168575. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Managing the water-energy-food nexus in the adige river basin: impacts of climate and land use change on ecosystem services bundles.管理阿迪杰河流域的水-能源-粮食关系:气候和土地利用变化对生态系统服务束的影响
Clim Change. 2025;178(9):168. doi: 10.1007/s10584-025-04013-3. Epub 2025 Sep 11.
2
Scientific modelling can be accessible, interoperable and user friendly: A case study for pasture and livestock modelling in Spain.科学建模可以具有可访问性、互操作性和用户友好性:以西班牙牧场和牲畜建模为例。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 24;18(2):e0281348. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281348. eCollection 2023.
3
Frameworks for mapping lake ecosystem services. An example from Lithuania.
湖泊生态系统服务映射框架。立陶宛的一个例子。
MethodsX. 2023 Jan 13;10:102015. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102015. eCollection 2023.
4
Multiscale Characteristics and Drivers of the Bundles of Ecosystem Service Budgets in the Su-Xi-Chang Region, China.中国苏锡常地区生态系统服务预算束的多尺度特征及其驱动因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 9;19(19):12910. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912910.
5
Considering Ecosystem Services in Food System Resilience.考虑生态系统服务在食物系统弹性中的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 19;19(6):3652. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063652.
6
Assessing Ecosystem Services Supply-Demand (Mis)Matches for Differential City Management in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration.评估长江三角洲城市群差异化城市管理中的生态系统服务供需(不)匹配。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 31;18(15):8130. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18158130.
7
An ecosystem service perspective on urban nature, physical activity, and health.从生态系统服务角度看城市自然、身体活动与健康。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 1;118(22). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2018472118.
8
Ecological restoration of agricultural land can improve its contribution to economic development.农业土地的生态恢复可以提高其对经济发展的贡献。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 5;16(3):e0247850. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247850. eCollection 2021.